Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

"Uber Performance" 928 Crankshafts Are Here!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-19-2012, 03:55 AM
  #16  
RKD in OKC
Rennlist Member
 
RKD in OKC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In a tizzy
Posts: 4,987
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Having lived through an alusil block that had been nikasiled, I cannot recommend Nikasil unless you are expecting to rebuild in under 20K miles.

Oh sure, come out with the uber crank as my engine is already going back together.

Last edited by RKD in OKC; 04-19-2012 at 04:17 AM.
Old 04-19-2012, 04:50 AM
  #17  
antlee928
Racer
 
antlee928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mate, that is a thing of beauty and elegance!!!!! I want one to sit on my mantle piece to admire and drool each and every day :-D
Old 04-19-2012, 05:02 AM
  #18  
NoVector
Rennlist Member
 
NoVector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: K-town, Germany
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 301 Likes on 152 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Speedtoys
Greg: Gimme a year..and you can do the whooooole thing.
+1; when I get back to the states, it's all yours.
Old 04-19-2012, 09:20 AM
  #19  
tv
Drifting
 
tv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: southern new england
Posts: 3,141
Received 251 Likes on 126 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
I finally have the first batch of my "Uber Performance" 928 crankshafts in hand.

Here's pictures of the 85.9mm (stock GTS stroke) crankshaft, along with some specifications that will interest all you technical guys.


* Great starting point for a "mini stroker" 2 valve 928 engine.



I'll post pictures and specifications for the other new crankshafts I have available, as soon as I have time.


So this is a drop in plug and play application for a Euro 4.7 block?
Old 04-19-2012, 09:53 AM
  #20  
Mike Simard
Three Wheelin'
 
Mike Simard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by RKD in OKC
Having lived through an alusil block that had been nikasiled, I cannot recommend Nikasil unless you are expecting to rebuild in under 20K miles.
The process is well established and there's nothing inherent that would cause low life.
Maybe you had media blasting debris that wasn't cleaned? Ring compatability could be another problem area but who knows, there are many ways for problems to arise when doing low volume custom work.
Old 04-19-2012, 11:23 AM
  #21  
RKD in OKC
Rennlist Member
 
RKD in OKC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In a tizzy
Posts: 4,987
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Nikasil was chipping off at top of all he bores at just under 20K.
Old 04-19-2012, 12:25 PM
  #22  
whatudrivin
Rennlist Member
 
whatudrivin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tv
So this is a drop in plug and play application for a Euro 4.7 block?
+2 Would like to know this myself....

And Richard how is your car coming? Any eta on when it will be ready?
Old 04-19-2012, 12:57 PM
  #23  
danglerb
Nordschleife Master
 
danglerb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orange, Cal
Posts: 8,575
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I can't think of a good reason to use a 4.7 instead of a 5.0 block, my way would be 5.0 bored to 104mm to get all the cheap cubes I can. (relatively speaking) At least leave none of them on the table without a good reason.
Old 04-19-2012, 01:05 PM
  #24  
Rob Edwards
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
 
Rob Edwards's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 17,508
Received 2,717 Likes on 1,318 Posts
Default

Yeah, if the cylinder bores need to be kissed regardless of whether they end up at 100, 102, or 104 mm post-Nikasil, then you might as well go big.
Old 04-19-2012, 01:06 PM
  #25  
IcemanG17
Race Director
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,270
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

drool....................................wow......

Hmm...a 5.4 to 5.8L engine between 100mm & 104 bore.....lets say 350ftlbs at 8k....nice 533HP!!!! 400ftlbs would be 609HP!!!!!

Imagine what a 928 engine would SOUND LIKE at 8k.....................mine is mind blowing at 6500 when the fuel cuts off......

I wonder what the limits of a 16V head-cams are.....you can run much more lift in the 2V heads and Bob Devores all were 2V heads......I dunno.....

Where did I leave that spare $20K+ Hmm maybe a secret high limit credit card just for Doc......Hmmm divorce doesn't sound good either
Old 04-19-2012, 01:28 PM
  #26  
Tim Murphy
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Tim Murphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Green Bay Wisconsin
Posts: 951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That's pretty.
Old 04-19-2012, 01:47 PM
  #27  
928mac
Drifting
 
928mac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,638
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Greg, what is the coating on the weight area.
It looks shiney.
I would dare to say that anyone would be hard pressed to find better quality, anywhere, period.
Old 04-19-2012, 02:55 PM
  #28  
GregBBRD
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,474 Likes on 1,468 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 928mac
Greg, what is the coating on the weight area.
It looks shiney.
I would dare to say that anyone would be hard pressed to find better quality, anywhere, period.
The surface is polished and then heat treated. It is very smooth.

You can always find someone that thinks they can improve on things. Certainly, a "better, lighter, stiffer crankshaft can be built that these cranks....but it will cost you 15K to 20K to build them....a tough sale in the 928 market.

I have never had a problem or a complaint about the Moldex cranks we have made. Good quality, good workmanship, good price. I considered that I might continue to stock those cranks (I still have one in stock) as they are slightly cheaper to buy, but if you factor in that their crank isn't balanced and these are....it's getting close enough to a "push" to not worry about it.

When I started to think about spinning engines "another 1000 rpms", it was obvious, to me, that I needed something different for a crankshaft. Something lighter, sitffer, and possibly with the two additional counterweights (although even 8,000 rpms isn't quite to the point where 8 counterweights are required.) I also wanted to be "involved" in the process and have a certain amount of control. Moldex isn't close to me. However, there are several very well respected crankshaft builders in Southern California and it was a "natural" evolution for me to go and talk to these people and pick one to build these cranks.

Due to the initial costs of engineering and programming to build these cranks....I will have to sell quite a few of them to get back these "initial" costs....and that would happen some quicker if I was to charge $4995...but I've never really done this stuff for the money....I do this stuff because I love it and I love these cars.
Old 04-19-2012, 02:58 PM
  #29  
GregBBRD
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,474 Likes on 1,468 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tv
So this is a drop in plug and play application for a Euro 4.7 block?
Not quite. You'd need to make sure that the eariler thrust bearing (smaller flanges on the 4.7 blocks) were relieved enough to accept a crank made with the larger thrust surfaces. It should clear, but you'd need to confirm that.

Plug and play in a 5.0 block.
Old 04-19-2012, 03:06 PM
  #30  
928mac
Drifting
 
928mac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,638
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Greg would my stock rods on MY 89 S4 fit and would it change the stroke?


Quick Reply: "Uber Performance" 928 Crankshafts Are Here!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:46 PM.