Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists
View Poll Results: Should checking the crankshaft end play be part of a PPI?
1. Checking for thrust bearing failure should not be part of a PPI.
10.29%
2. Checking for thrust bearing failure absolutely should be part of a PPI.
70.59%
3. I like Pie
27.94%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 68. You may not vote on this poll

Poll: should a PPI include a check for Crankshaft End Play?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-09-2011, 12:26 PM
  #16  
Mike Frye
Craic Head
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Mike Frye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Jersey Shore, USA
Posts: 8,795
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

<<< voted 2 and 3 because I think it should be part of every PPI*


*If it's an auto... I know it's theoretically possible for this to be an issue in a 5 speed, but I've never read about it actually happening and the design flaw that causes it in autos is not present in the manual.



and I do like pie
Old 08-09-2011, 12:29 PM
  #17  
Cosmo Kramer
Rennlist Member
 
Cosmo Kramer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: On boost
Posts: 4,615
Received 141 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

I believe that if a PPI is requested on a 928 that it should be part of the process. The problem is finding a shop knowledgeable enough in 928's that can perform this check locally when you are purchasing the car. Many Porsche independent shops are well versed in 911's Boxsters etc. but cannot do a proper PPI on a 928.

Personally I would just find a hoist or pit, throw on the coveralls and do it myself. Not everyone has the ability to do that.
Old 08-09-2011, 12:34 PM
  #18  
James Bailey
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
James Bailey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 18,061
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Having spent many many years selling parts to shop owners and talking with mechanics who are working on a 928 and countless owners.....very very few knew of Thrust Bearing Failure until I told them.....besides in MOST cases it is like you are taking a horse to a Vet who specializes in birds...
My solution of course is to simply not buy an automatic....
Old 08-09-2011, 12:41 PM
  #19  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 46 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blown 87
I think he meant that it is a normal thing.

This is a near exact quote.
"this type of issue is simular to the 928 GTS's all using oil, things just happen with use on these older cars with miles and usage..There is nothing a normal PPI would of ever done that would of found this that I'm aware of !!"
That quote is different than saying it is normal for a GTS to have TBF and a PPI should not include testing for it. I can agree with that quote.
Old 08-09-2011, 12:42 PM
  #20  
IcemanG17
Race Director
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,265
Received 71 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

for auto's 100% yes.....I wouldn't worry about it for 5 speeds or early pre 84 auto's
Old 08-09-2011, 12:56 PM
  #21  
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
blown 87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Ball
That quote is different than saying it is normal for a GTS to have TBF and a PPI should not include testing for it. I can agree with that quote.
so you can agree that a normal PPI would not check for end play???????????????
Because to me a PPI would include a end play check.
Old 08-09-2011, 01:08 PM
  #22  
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
blown 87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Bunch of Pie haters here also.
Old 08-09-2011, 01:42 PM
  #23  
GlenL
Nordschleife Master
 
GlenL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 7,635
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

I went for pie because that elicited the strongest response.

Crank play is a problem only on automatics, for one thing. You can also gauge the problem by releasing the intermediate shaft and looking at the movement. Much easier than testing the crank. If it does move a lot (and what's a lot?) then proceed to a crank movement test.

Incidentally, 0.005 doesn't indicate a failure. It indicates the need to drop the pan and take a look.
Old 08-09-2011, 02:08 PM
  #24  
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
blown 87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

That was .005 past the wear limit, not .005 of movement.

You are fooling your self if you think that how much flex is in the flex plate is a good indicator, because it is not, I have seen them sin over .075 of bow and only have .010 of end play.

What very little bow will tell you is that the pressure has been released.


Originally Posted by GlenL
I went for pie because that elicited the strongest response.

Crank play is a problem only on automatics, for one thing. You can also gauge the problem by releasing the intermediate shaft and looking at the movement. Much easier than testing the crank. If it does move a lot (and what's a lot?) then proceed to a crank movement test.

Incidentally, 0.005 doesn't indicate a failure. It indicates the need to drop the pan and take a look.
Old 08-09-2011, 02:28 PM
  #25  
GlenL
Nordschleife Master
 
GlenL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 7,635
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blown 87
What very little bow will tell you is that the pressure has been released.
Or that there has been no pressure. Ask if it has been worked on and released.

Does 0.005 mean it's through the thrust bearing? No.
Old 08-09-2011, 02:40 PM
  #26  
SeanR
Rennlist Member
 
SeanR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 35,700
Received 498 Likes on 266 Posts
Default

I like pie.

I've tossed this around in my head a few times. When I do a typical PPI on a car I give the customer a choice. Either it's $150.00 for the basic, 4 page inspection. If I get in to doing a compression check, it is $250.00. And if the person wants me to check the crank end play on a car with stock exhaust, it's another $75.00 on top of whatever option they pic. So either $225.00 or $325.00.

Most people will opt for the basic one that takes me a bit over an hour to go through and have had no one ask me to check the crank end play. I suppose it's just not that important to a potential owner who doesn't know much about these cars. And yes, I do stress the importance of it and if it ends up being a local guy who's car I work on, then I end up getting paid to do it either way.

I know of guys out there that will charge $500.00 for a PPI, and for that kind of money, they damn well better check everything, up to and including the torque on the wheels.

Crazy isn't it.
Old 08-09-2011, 03:00 PM
  #27  
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
blown 87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GlenL
Or that there has been no pressure. Ask if it has been worked on and released.

Does 0.005 mean it's through the thrust bearing? No.
How about .020 like this car had?
Old 08-09-2011, 03:04 PM
  #28  
GlenL
Nordschleife Master
 
GlenL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 7,635
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blown 87
How about .020 like this car had?
How much play is there with a new thrust bearing? You need to subtract that from the number to see how much wear there is.

In any case, the thrust bearing faces are thicker than 0.020.
Old 08-09-2011, 03:09 PM
  #29  
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
blown 87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GlenL
How much play is there with a new thrust bearing? You need to subtract that from the number to see how much wear there is.

In any case, the thrust bearing faces are thicker than 0.020.
It will be into the copper and maybe have some steel showing, I have seen them into the copper at .012.

There seems to be some variance in the thrust bearings or cranks, I have seen enough of them to know that some at .010 look as bad as others at .020.

So subtracting the new limits does not really work in the real world.

I start getting worried at anything over .010 total play, and at twice that, well you are rolling the dice.
Old 08-09-2011, 03:36 PM
  #30  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 46 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blown 87
so you can agree that a normal PPI would not check for end play???????????????
Because to me a PPI would include a end play check.
Would and should are two different things. Ideally it should, but since the problem has never been officially recognized except with improperly installed transmissions, and performing the inspection requires dropping the bellypans, front exhaust and lower bellhousing cover, I've rarely heard of it being done pre-purchase. Of course, I would recommend it too with any late model auto box.


Quick Reply: Poll: should a PPI include a check for Crankshaft End Play?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:48 AM.