Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Dyno results - OB breaks 300bhp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-20-2011, 01:04 PM
  #16  
Benton
Drifting
 
Benton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 3,348
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

You gotta open up the exhaust, I think you would see some pretty big gains there.
Old 01-20-2011, 01:20 PM
  #17  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,453
Received 2,072 Likes on 1,183 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hopwood
Hacker, the cams in my engine are the most aggressive you can get for 16v (see attached table), a Euro S2.
Ok - good to know, very interesting.

Originally Posted by z driver 88t
Just wondering if he's testing on a Dynojet or Mustang chassis dyno. Generally the Mustang dynos tend to read a little lower than Dynojet IIRC.
Neither, Dyno Dynamics is the brand:
http://www.dyno.com.au/dyno/controller

There is also Superflow, Dynocom, Dynapac....all have their own formula.

From years of collecting graphs & dyno files, Dyno Dyamics tend to run a bit on the high side along with Dynapac's, which this test confirms:

http://www.modified.com/tech/modp-09...n/dynojet.html

Same car, 5 different dyno's:
Dyno Dash Round-up (SAE J1349)
Fame Mustang 292.7
Drift-Office Dynojet 312.5
English Racing Dynojet 315.9
Pina Dyno Dynamics 318.6
Speed Factory Dynapack 324.4

So much for the myth Dynojets are always the highest

This is all irrelevant as long as you use the same dyno (or at least the same kind) for the before / after tests.


IIRC Jean-Louis 4.7 EuroS CIS put down about 276rwhp on a DynoJet. That was with headers and dual exhaust.
Old 01-20-2011, 02:16 PM
  #18  
bronto
Drifting
 
bronto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 2,808
Received 48 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Anybody else notice that the dotted line looks sort of like the silhouette of a 928?
Old 01-20-2011, 02:20 PM
  #19  
soupcan
Drifting
 
soupcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 2,204
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

http://my350z.com/forum/vq35hr/40554...s-dynojet.html

Three dyno's 34hp and 60tq difference between them.
Old 01-20-2011, 02:27 PM
  #20  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,453
Received 2,072 Likes on 1,183 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by soupcan
http://my350z.com/forum/vq35hr/40554...s-dynojet.html

Three dyno's 34hp and 60tq difference between them.
That goes right with all the other sheets I've collected.

From that thread:

Mustang - 306whp / 254ft-lbs
DynoJet - 311whp / 260ft-lbs
Dynocom - 340.9whp / 315.0 ft-lbs

Just more reinforcement to pick a shop / dyno and stay with it.
Old 01-20-2011, 02:44 PM
  #21  
LostInSpace
Rennlist Member
 
LostInSpace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK - Ex NZ
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Joel,

Pleased to see progress on the car and looking forward to further updates.

Out of curiosity, who's going to build the exhaust? I've spoken to Zero Exhuasts in Kent for a full stainless, 2.5" dual mandrel bent X pipe back system for my GT. They come highly recommended, but aren't the cheapest, nor local.
Old 01-20-2011, 02:47 PM
  #22  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,946
Received 141 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

I am totally confused. what is the manifold you have on the car? is it euro , or a real US 86.5 US 4 valve manifold, as you seem to convey by the original post?

we commonly get 250rwhp even with Ljet on a 4.7, but need to get a 5 liter with that euro config go get near 300rwhp. oh, you said it was scaled up due to not being wheel? more confusion. just post rear wheel hp ALWAYS, and then you can mention flywheel based on 15% or whatever.

so, what are the mods you have, or is it just a 4.7 with 282rwhp, which is really good by the way. proving to me that the CIS system is really the difference. what is it that roger sold you? something modified to the intake?
Old 01-20-2011, 02:51 PM
  #23  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,946
Received 141 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

gains for exhaust is about 10hp for headers and 10hp for open exhaust

I saw not much change for running a mustang vs dynojet. 318rwhp vs 320rwp at the time, on the Holbert S4 5 liter stock with equal length headers, 85 cams, etc.
Old 01-20-2011, 05:09 PM
  #24  
GregBBRD
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,221
Received 2,452 Likes on 1,459 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fabio421
I hate to be the bearer of bad news but 300BHP on a Euro S is nothing to brag about.
If that is real wheel horsepower, that would be great!
__________________
greg brown




714 879 9072
GregBBRD@aol.com

Semi-retired, as of Feb 1, 2023.
The days of free technical advice are over.
Free consultations will no longer be available.
Will still be in the shop, isolated and exclusively working on project cars, developmental work and products, engines and transmissions.
Have fun with your 928's people!





Old 01-20-2011, 05:32 PM
  #25  
Tom. M
Deleted
Rennlist Member
 
Tom. M's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,417
Received 182 Likes on 106 Posts
Default

I think the dyno dynamics graph in "shoot out" mode is basically a conversion to what dynojet numbers would be (approx. 15% on top of the standard dyno dynamics mode)...

The dyno dynamics unit we used here (when it was still here) tested lower than the equivalent Dynojet on the same car..
Old 01-20-2011, 06:33 PM
  #26  
Lizard928
Nordschleife Master
 
Lizard928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Abbotsford B.C.
Posts: 9,600
Received 34 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Joel has had bad numbers in the past from this motor, so that is why he thinks that these numbers are good.

But unfortunately the british shops never seem to want to give RWHP figures.

I think that 300BHP is taking in a correction factor of 17% iirc.
That would be about 256 RWHP
Old 01-20-2011, 07:46 PM
  #27  
123quattro
Drifting
 
123quattro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Farmington Hills, MI
Posts: 2,973
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Getting the WOT switch to work on mine was worth about 40whp. It went from ridiculously lean to perfect A/F at wot. Transient and part throttle is another story....
Old 01-20-2011, 08:22 PM
  #28  
Dave928S
Rennlist Member
 
Dave928S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 4,681
Received 64 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
I am totally confused. what is the manifold you have on the car? is it euro , or a real US 86.5 US 4 valve manifold, as you seem to convey by the original post?
I took it that he got rid of the original cast exhaust manifolds and put on 32 valve 86.5 SS standard two bolt manifolds, which are a bolt on replacement for the cast boat anchors. They flow a bit better than the cast, and so are a cheap bolt on improvement, without going to headers. It's obviously second best to headers, but no one mass produces them for RHD cars. You pay $$$$ for custom made RHD headers or do what Greg did and make them yourself.

Outside the US we have to make do without some things that you regard as standard bolt on, like headers, or pay an arm and a leg for shipping from the US or getting them custom made.

Reading your post again, you thought he was talking about an intake manifold.
Old 01-21-2011, 02:19 AM
  #29  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,946
Received 141 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

thanks! Yep, I was thinking he was talking about intake.
Old 01-21-2011, 03:42 AM
  #30  
hopwood
Racer
Thread Starter
 
hopwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: London, UK
Posts: 339
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
I am totally confused. what is the manifold you have on the car? is it euro , or a real US 86.5 US 4 valve manifold, as you seem to convey by the original post?

we commonly get 250rwhp even with Ljet on a 4.7, but need to get a 5 liter with that euro config go get near 300rwhp. oh, you said it was scaled up due to not being wheel? more confusion. just post rear wheel hp ALWAYS, and then you can mention flywheel based on 15% or whatever.

so, what are the mods you have, or is it just a 4.7 with 282rwhp, which is really good by the way. proving to me that the CIS system is really the difference. what is it that roger sold you? something modified to the intake?
As cleared up below Mark, the intake manifold is Euro S, the exhaust manifold are upgraded to 86.5. The motor is Euro S2 4.7 with KJet, the exhaust is original from 79 (it was originally a 4.5 240bhp).

Will post up the wheel numbers with the new scan. Peak power was 260rwhp.

Joel


Quick Reply: Dyno results - OB breaks 300bhp



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:32 AM.