Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Twin Turbo 928 fixed and back out there terrorizing the streets!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-26-2010, 02:12 PM
  #241  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,052
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

The maps you have are correct. Those "special maps" were developed when Louie was tuning that twinscrew car with Sharktuner Mk1. and a SMAF.

With ST2 that you are using for tuning, the SMAF extended load files are a standard menu option.

Looking at the datalog you sent me , the load values look normal. When you first hit 100% load at 3750rpm, I reckon you are making about 540HP crank... !


Originally Posted by ptuomov
I am still running at the single mode high up, so there's some extra headroom there. Not a huge amount, since the injectors still need to be closed a large enough fraction of the time to cool down, but one definitely gains half the injector opening/closing and fuel acceleration times.

Here's another question that I am trying to figure out. With the superMAF, how is the EZK load variable related to the LH MAF signal? The "EZK Load [%]" pegs at 100 before 3450 rpm and stays there for the duration up to the rev limit. Is that supposed to happen when the "LH MAF signal" is still showing a lot of variation in the range 160-225?

[EDIT: Some extra info here on superMAF EZK behavior: https://rennlist.com/forums/5308293-post12.html. Do I need the special EZK maps, too?]
Old 07-26-2010, 02:15 PM
  #242  
tveltman
Burning Brakes
 
tveltman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Tuomo,
Are you using stock head gaskets? What do you estimate the CR at compared to the nominal CR? Thanks!
Old 07-26-2010, 02:22 PM
  #243  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tveltman
Tuomo,
Are you using stock head gaskets? What do you estimate the CR at compared to the nominal CR? Thanks!
This is an '87 engine with about 69k miles. To my knowledge, it has never been opened (other than the cam covers were off for powder coating and having mroe breather ports installed.) The head gaskets are the factory originals, as are the bearings, pistons, rings, cams. Cam timing is as it came from the factory. There's absolutely nothing special about the engine long block, other than that it's an '87 which means it has the thick top, large dish pistons and the strong PPF rods.

My guess for the static compression ratio is 9.4:1, given the dish sizes I've seen / heard about for other '87 engines.
Old 07-26-2010, 02:26 PM
  #244  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Speake
Looking at the datalog you sent me , the load values look normal. When you first hit 100% load at 3750rpm, I reckon you are making about 540HP crank... !
That would be about 750 ft-lb of crank torque. I doubt it's making that much at 14 psi. The rear wheel dynojet number from the 14 psi pull was 617 ft-lb, and dynojets show overly optimistic numbers.
Old 07-26-2010, 02:38 PM
  #245  
tveltman
Burning Brakes
 
tveltman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What kind of intake temps are you seeing at your highest boost level?
Old 07-26-2010, 03:04 PM
  #246  
VehiGAZ
Rennlist Member
 
VehiGAZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Oxford, CT
Posts: 1,556
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ptuomov
That would be about 750 ft-lb of crank torque.
This project of yours is just SICK!!! I cannot wait to find out what you end up getting at the wheels!
Old 07-26-2010, 03:37 PM
  #247  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker-Pschorr
Once you get much past 50-60lb injectors you are dealing with low impedeance injectors. Low impedance injectors can be drilled down to a much lower pulse width due to a faster reaction time, which is a direct result of how much current it takes to drive them. The 80lb (or larger, cannot remember) injectors Todd is using with Autronic are low impedance.

Some claim you can install a simple resistor pack to use low impedance injectors with a high impedance driver like the LH. Even if this were true, the stock system isn't going control them properly. A true low impedance system is "peak and hold", high impedance systems are known as a "saturated" system.

There are secondary controller packs designed to go between a stock high impedance system to properly drive low impedance injectors. I have yet to find someone that's actually attempted this on a street car.

Has very little to do with age since all 80-84 US L-Jet 928's have low impedance injectors.
What you write makes sense. I think the ECU can still make a difference, because of the older ones seem to have less resolution in the pulse width.

Originally Posted by tveltman
What kind of intake temps are you seeing at your highest boost level?
I don't know yet. What I do know is that the bottom of the intercooler is warm but the top of the intercooler is about the same temperature as the outside air. Which is not very scientific but seems to be indicating that the ICs are working. More data later.

Originally Posted by VehiGAZ
This project of yours is just SICK!!! I cannot wait to find out what you end up getting at the wheels!
For the record, I don't think I am making 750 ft-lb at crank at 14 psi. But we'll see. I am very interested in seeing what John's system can really do on a completely stock '87 long block.
Old 07-26-2010, 10:48 PM
  #248  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,545
Received 1,678 Likes on 1,088 Posts
Default

I just scanned through this. (I can't spare the time to read carefully and contemplate.) But,...

... nice job Tuomo. You have the meanest 928 on the East Coast.
Old 07-26-2010, 10:52 PM
  #249  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by worf928
I just scanned through this. (I can't spare the time to read carefully and contemplate.) But,...
... nice job Tuomo. You have the meanest 928 on the East Coast.
(a) It's almost all John so far
(b) I am going to call you soon with some stuff that I need help with
Old 07-26-2010, 11:39 PM
  #250  
jackson101
Advanced
 
jackson101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Rockford Michigan
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default amazing

Nice work, great attention to detail.
Old 07-26-2010, 11:51 PM
  #251  
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
 
blown 87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ptuomov
For the record, I don't think I am making 750 ft-lb at crank at 14 psi. But we'll see. I am very interested in seeing what John's system can really do on a completely stock '87 long block.
If you are making any where close to that it is going to just flat go.
Old 07-27-2010, 12:18 AM
  #252  
cold_beer839
Rennlist Member
 
cold_beer839's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lillington, NC
Posts: 2,742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You may want to start looking for a military surplus ejection seat.
Old 07-27-2010, 12:22 AM
  #253  
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
 
blown 87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cold_beer839
You may want to start looking for a military surplus ejection seat.
Or at least a good broom to sweep parts off the street if he finds "Hook", gonna be a very fast car.
Old 07-27-2010, 01:31 AM
  #254  
Iwanna928
Rennlist Member
 
Iwanna928's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Woodstock Ga.
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Scary, scary, scary. Amazing system. A tribute not only to John's system but also to the 928 engine! Simply amazing. Makes all those no sayers second quess what is possible.
Old 07-27-2010, 09:54 AM
  #255  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blown 87
If you are making any where close to that it is going to just flat go.
It does move pretty well on a low gear above 3500 rpm. I get wheel spin on first three gears, but not as much I thought. It's a 3800 or so pound car with the driver and gas, and the springs are pretty loose, so maybe it plants that fat *** on the rear tires well. It's also that I have that stock '87 box with the 2.2 rear.

3500-6500 rpm on first gear feels like a blink of an eye, on second gear 4000-6500 takes about as long as it takes to think "remember to shift right away!" On third gear, there are several seconds to look around at the traffic and speculate if you hit anything on the first two gears.

Gauges are completely useless, other than the tachometer. I can't look at boost, I can't look at turbo speed, I can't look at the ST2, I couldn't look at the AFR gauge if I had one, etc. Even tachometer is a stretch. I now understand why people have shift lights. This all reinforces my view that audio alerts are going to be very important.

Gotta do something about the exhaust before the audio alerts would work, though... ;-)


Quick Reply: Twin Turbo 928 fixed and back out there terrorizing the streets!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:23 PM.