Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Twin Turbo 928 fixed and back out there terrorizing the streets!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-16-2010, 09:41 AM
  #166  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Roy928tt
Besides the problem with excesive heat I believe there is a problem with pressure affecting the accuracy of the sensor as well, maybe the problem is more related to gas density rather than pressure, still I seem to recall somebody telling me there is an issue. I reckon it was on original minis with the 5 port head he wanted to measure the mixtures of the 3 individual runners before the turbine to see if mixtures were the same across all four cylinders, but oxygen sensors wouldn't work in the pressurised atmoshere. Anyway just something to be aware or wary of.
This is one of those issues that is both a risk and an opportunity. The Bosch sensor and Innovate controller measure both the exhaust temperature and pressure. They need to do that because the raw duty cycle signal can't be itnerepreted without conditioning it on the exhaust gas pressure and temperature.

So, yes, on the one hand, if the pressure is outside the operating range of the system this will not work. On the other hand, if the pressure is within the operating range of the system, one can potentiall eliminate two other sensors and tap into those pressure and temperatuer signals directly!
Old 07-16-2010, 09:52 AM
  #167  
Roy928tt
Racer
 
Roy928tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide South Australia'79 5spd twin turbo
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

OK Good luck

I must add I'm quite enjoying how your endeavor is coming along, John mentioned it to me quite some time ago, I firmly believe you will reach your goal, and probably easier than you expect, I also expect that the currently fitted engine will make some decent numbers before it gives up.

Keep it up

Cheers Roy
Old 07-16-2010, 10:02 AM
  #168  
Mike Frye
Craic Head
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Mike Frye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Jersey Shore, USA
Posts: 8,795
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FREAKINHEAT
Why hasn't someone made a plastic replica of this front mount intake? Aren't there hp gains to be made with a cai?
Originally Posted by ptuomov
You can buy that cold air intake and air filter system, install it on a NA car, take out the stock air filter element inside the box, and see if it makes any more power than stock. I would guess that most of the impact would be visual and the engine power would not be impacted much if the engine is otherwise stock. I do like the look though.
I've got the Kuhn CAI snorkel on my car and I'm hoping to do a dyno run in the next month or two comparing stock filter to this 'snorkel' filter. My car is NA but with 55psi FPR and Porken s300s chips (soon to be 'racer' chips with non-resistor plugs). Will post the results.

And Tuomo: I'm really sorry I didn't check this thread out sooner. For some reason I thought it was about a concert or something.

Very cool stuff, unbelievable. I heard you referring to the TT project in other threads but didn't know you had all this info posted.
Old 07-16-2010, 02:23 PM
  #169  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default Bosch LSU 4.2 tech spec

By the way, in case anyone needs this, here's the link to a fairly detailed technical info on the Bosch LSU 4.2 wideband lambda sensor:

http://wbo2.com/lsu/Y258K01005e03mar21eng.pdf

It'd be interesting to see what information a competent person (not me) could extract from those wires...
Old 07-16-2010, 02:28 PM
  #170  
123quattro
Drifting
 
123quattro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Farmington Hills, MI
Posts: 2,973
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Those sensors are good enough to see individual cylinder misfires. AEM widebands use Bosch sensors. However, the AEM controller does not spit out data nearly fast enough to indicate the misfires. Nor will a Innovate controller give you that level of data. You need lab grade controllers like ETAS or whoever else to be able to decipher the data. And then you need some data acquisition that samples the controller fast enough to see what it's telling you.
Old 07-16-2010, 02:45 PM
  #171  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 123quattro
Those sensors are good enough to see individual cylinder misfires. AEM widebands use Bosch sensors. However, the AEM controller does not spit out data nearly fast enough to indicate the misfires. Nor will a Innovate controller give you that level of data. You need lab grade controllers like ETAS or whoever else to be able to decipher the data. And then you need some data acquisition that samples the controller fast enough to see what it's telling you.
Such a fast controller would have to get the camshaft/crankshaft position and the direct feed from the Bosch sensor's Nernst cell. The Innovate controller would be used as before to operate the oxygen pump to keep the exhaust-oxygen "measuring cavity" at near lambda = 1. The Innovate controller would also continue to measure the average exhaust lambda value. At lambda 1, the Nernst cell voltage would fluctuate around 0.5V with individual cylinder pulses. With this fast controller, you could tell which cylinders are lean and which rich relative to the average, but not very accurately by how much. With one fast controller per V8 engine, the output could be as simple as eight bit number (0-255) with the bits representing cylinders and 1 indicating leaner than average. The data logger could then sample this fast controller at its leisure.

Big fat reader warning that I don't know what I am talking about here.
Old 07-16-2010, 03:42 PM
  #172  
SQLGuy
Three Wheelin'
 
SQLGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Colorado Springs, CO USA
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

The fora aren't currently accessible at the Innovate site, but I had asked them a few months ago about the practicality of using an oscilloscope to read the controller output so that I could adjust injector trim (on my MicroSquirt motorcycle project) and individual carburetor idle mixture (on my "other" motorcycle). They quickly replied saying that this was perfectly feasible and that they had done it in the past.

With a two channel scope, you could synch trigger based on the hall sender signal or inductive pickup of #1 ignition and count exhaust pulses in the WB signal from there.

BTW, I played around with this on the MicroSquirt project, but then decided to build a new manifold for it, and then got sidetracked onto a bunch of higher priority tasks. The manifold's done, though, and I should be getting back into this in the next few weeks.
Old 07-16-2010, 04:14 PM
  #173  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SQLGuy
The fora aren't currently accessible at the Innovate site, but I had asked them a few months ago about the practicality of using an oscilloscope to read the controller output so that I could adjust injector trim (on my MicroSquirt motorcycle project) and individual carburetor idle mixture (on my "other" motorcycle). They quickly replied saying that this was perfectly feasible and that they had done it in the past. With a two channel scope, you could synch trigger based on the hall sender signal or inductive pickup of #1 ignition and count exhaust pulses in the WB signal from there. BTW, I played around with this on the MicroSquirt project, but then decided to build a new manifold for it, and then got sidetracked onto a bunch of higher priority tasks. The manifold's done, though, and I should be getting back into this in the next few weeks.
All fascinating! Would you have read the Innovate controller output, which is basically the oxygen pump required duty cycle or the Nernst cell voltage from the Bosch sensor that the Innovate controller attempts to control? I am guessing that at low rpm the former is better and at high rpm the latter is better. What is high and what is low rpm depends on how fast the Innovate controller is and smoothly it controls the Bosch sensor.
Old 07-18-2010, 06:32 PM
  #174  
Fabio421
Man of many SIGs
Rennlist Member
 
Fabio421's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 8,722
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Is the engine that Jim Morton built for you a 5 liter or something larger?
Old 07-19-2010, 12:11 AM
  #175  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fabio421
Is the engine that Jim Morton built for you a 5 liter or something larger?
5.0
Old 07-19-2010, 12:38 AM
  #176  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default 900 mile shakedown + dyno

I just got home from shaking down the car. Drove 914 miles today with it. No radio -- just the exhaust, fuel pump, and radar detector providing the information and entertainment.

The car sounds like group of one percenters riding in formation.

The tune is good in steady state, a little more work to be done with the transient response.

We also did some dyno pulls. The hp numbers are of no significance, it was just some pulls in a 100F warehouse. The purpose of the pulls was to get the data needed to construct the rpm specific boost profiles.

Dyno event was fun though. We got a last minute time slot, and had to wait for these guys to tune a carb. It's a big block hemi car with about $80k work done. (Doesn't make as much power as a twin turbo 928, by the way.)

Name:  Waited4h.jpg
Views: 765
Size:  138.5 KB

While waiting, I checked out this car. That's a "real" Shelby, built this year.

Name:  LookedAtThis.jpg
Views: 775
Size:  130.2 KB

Finally, our turn. The car's strapped on in the photo. This shop doesn't do turbo cars regularly, so the instrumentation wasn't best suited for our purposes. We got all the data, but had to be reading three separate systems the same time.

Name:  Strapped.jpg
Views: 785
Size:  143.0 KB

They do all sorts of race cars, and had set up the dyno to trigger an error code with 180 mph tire speed. With the 2.2 rear end, we made the dyno tilt on the first pull. Little hacking and limit was upped to 200 mph, and that we could work with.

Name:  MakeRun.jpg
Views: 768
Size:  92.7 KB

Name:  TooFast.jpg
Views: 769
Size:  93.4 KB

In the spirit of full disclosure, here's what the first session yielded in terms of results. Just a first stab, now it's time to use those curves and the data logs to come up with the boost maps.

Name:  Printout.jpg
Views: 741
Size:  44.5 KB
Old 07-19-2010, 02:01 AM
  #177  
Lizard928
Nordschleife Master
 
Lizard928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Abbotsford B.C.
Posts: 9,600
Received 34 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

What PSI were the runs done at?
Old 07-19-2010, 02:19 AM
  #178  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lizard931
What PSI were the runs done at?
Because the shop was old-school American V8 place, their system didn't have a boost pickup/hookup. Since the car is S4, it doesn't have a MAP sensor. (Yes, I'll put one in when I get around to it.) The boost gauge / controller has the pressure transducer built in and doesn't have signal outlet. So what we had to do is set the boost controller to target certain boost and then have one dedicated human being watching the gauge to tell us did the controller actually deliver the set point. With these disclosures, on the graph the highest pull had 13.5-14 psi boost, the middle on about 12 psi, and the lowest about 9 psi.

The conditions were less than ideal. The dyno place was a bit like a Finnish smoke sauna!

I am not putting much stock in these dynojet results in general, and I am not making an exception here. The drag strip trap speed will tell us the truth once we get there.

Overall, John's system is pretty incredible. I drove four hours on the fifth gear with the 2.2 rear end. The car accelerates on the fifth gear at 65 mph well enough that once you are on the highway in light traffic on the fifth gear, changes are completely unnecessary. I forgot I was driving a manual car on two occasions! (Nothing too embarrassing.) Downshifting to fourth and flooring the pedal would then turn Bruce Banner into the Incredible Hulk. And this with an engine that is completely bone stock apart from John's turbo system.

Last edited by ptuomov; 07-19-2010 at 10:53 AM.
Old 07-19-2010, 10:18 AM
  #179  
AO
Supercharged
Rennlist Member
 
AO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Back in Michigan - Full time!
Posts: 18,925
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Congrats on the car. While you you are being humble and discounting the numbers they are, quite nice. One thing I remember from when I was dyno tuning my car, the shaky/wavy portion of the dyno graph usually indicate knock, or something else wrong with the tune.

Did you guys have the SharkTuner logging for knock and overall advance? I'm also surprised the shop didn't have a hook up to record boost - every other dyno shop I've seen has this. Seems odd.

How was your AFR? Transition is almost impossible to tune on our cars. I've finally got mine to go to the 12's as soon as it sees 1psi. It's a beautiful thing.
Old 07-19-2010, 10:43 AM
  #180  
Imo000
Captain Obvious
Super User
 
Imo000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,846
Received 338 Likes on 244 Posts
Default

Impressive! Well done!


Quick Reply: Twin Turbo 928 fixed and back out there terrorizing the streets!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:48 PM.