Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

928 RS4 Project... needs 378hp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-11-2010, 10:04 AM
  #31  
kccampro
Pro
Thread Starter
 
kccampro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Constantine
Throwing in my thoughts on your question:

1. For the money, do a stock engine rebuild with some extra head work for better flow, drilled crank for the 2/6 oiling problem, oil pan and oil scraper mods to help with track oiling issues and install an accusump system. It's not fun building up a racer and having the engine go boom on you.

2. Install a super charger system that has a proven track survivability history.

3. Install headers, Y pipe and a light single exhaust system, 3.5" or 4" will be perfect. Before anyone flames me look into the capability of flow through such a system. Anything below 500 HP this system will be fine.

4. Use the Shark Tuner and a dyno to tune that engine and super charger properly. Money and time well spent or else you will most probably suffer engine damage. At least not run the engine at it's optimum.

5. Don't go too crazy with suspension mods or brake mods. The 928 can do very well with most of it's suspension and brake system, especially the S4 brakes, left alone but with a few tweaks. Better brake pad compounds, sway bars front and rear, known springs and shocks. You can dump a lot of money here with little gained over tweaked stock systems. Just because you can adjust shocks two or three ways doesn't mean you will do so correctly.

A word about horse power, it's nice but torque is a great commodity on the track and what will shoot you ahead out of a corner over a higher horsepower car with less torque. BTDT.

Have fun,
I was planning on the accusump but hadn't thought of dilling the crank to resolve the 2/6 oiling problem - good thinking. Yes, the supercharger route does make sence from a torque perspective, plus it minimizes my investment in the engine which might give out at some point. The brakes are stock S4 and the suspension is 'lightly modified'. More good feedback - thanks!
Old 03-12-2010, 07:07 PM
  #32  
IcemanG17
Race Director
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,271
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Constantine
Throwing in my thoughts on your question:

1. For the money, do a stock engine rebuild with some extra head work for better flow, drilled crank for the 2/6 oiling problem, oil pan and oil scraper mods to help with track oiling issues and install an accusump system. It's not fun building up a racer and having the engine go boom on you.

2. Install a super charger system that has a proven track survivability history.

3. Install headers, Y pipe and a light single exhaust system, 3.5" or 4" will be perfect. Before anyone flames me look into the capability of flow through such a system. Anything below 500 HP this system will be fine.

4. Use the Shark Tuner and a dyno to tune that engine and super charger properly. Money and time well spent or else you will most probably suffer engine damage. At least not run the engine at it's optimum.

5. Don't go too crazy with suspension mods or brake mods. The 928 can do very well with most of it's suspension and brake system, especially the S4 brakes, left alone but with a few tweaks. Better brake pad compounds, sway bars front and rear, known springs and shocks. You can dump a lot of money here with little gained over tweaked stock systems. Just because you can adjust shocks two or three ways doesn't mean you will do so correctly.

A word about horse power, it's nice but torque is a great commodity on the track and what will shoot you ahead out of a corner over a higher horsepower car with less torque. BTDT.

Have fun,
Speaking from PURE experience....it is NOT fun to buy a "racer" 928 and watch it blow up after 6 trackdays.....ask me how I know...... Build the engine correctly ONCE...& it will last on track.....reliability is far more important than peak power

The current engine in lemons has 24 hours on track.....which is probably about a seasons worth of DE-sprint races....& I am confident the oil will come back perfect...... 100% stock with just a retrograde to the oil style oil sump + a 3/8th pan spacer.....thats it......no accusump, no oil cooler....nothing and no PRESSURE drops in the corners!!! I never ever saw less than 75psi in higher RPM corners (we were taking corners between 3-4000).....with RPM's up higher say 5000 it was near 100psi
Old 03-12-2010, 07:59 PM
  #33  
SwayBar
Rennlist Member
 
SwayBar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago Bears
Posts: 3,535
Received 326 Likes on 225 Posts
Default

Since your horsepower goals are modest (..very smart), I would not do the supercharger install with its added complexity, weight, and tuning. That's a lot of extra moving parts just for an additional 50 rwhp (..270 to 320).

Instead, I would do a stock S4 engine with GT or S3 cams, headers, x-pipe, and a free-flow exhaust, and tweak it on they dyno with a fuel-pressure regulator. This setup should get you an easy 320 rwhp which will hit your target crank hp assuming a manual tranny.

Simple, simple, simple!

Bonus points for a drilled crank, Kevin's scraper, and an accusump for reliability.

The beauty of this setup is that it should run forever as it's essentially a stock engine, thus easy on the drivetrain too.

Old 03-13-2010, 09:28 AM
  #34  
9x8
Racer
 
9x8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: The Evil Empire.
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IcemanG17
100% stock with just a retrograde to the oil style oil sump + a 3/8th pan spacer.....thats it......no accusump, no oil cooler....nothing and no PRESSURE drops in the corners!!! I never ever saw less than 75psi in higher RPM corners (we were taking corners between 3-4000).....with RPM's up higher say 5000 it was near 100psi
Wow, you sounded exactly like Kibort!
Old 03-13-2010, 02:14 PM
  #35  
IcemanG17
Race Director
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,271
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 9x8
Wow, you sounded exactly like Kibort!
okay I'll rephrase...........its the AMSOIL.....
Old 03-15-2010, 02:07 PM
  #36  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Gee, doesnt that sound familar????

Almost all the failures that ive seen or heard about, came from suspect engines to start with, and some oil that breaks down at high temp.

So, you basically, found an undamaged engine that was fairly clean and beat the snot out of it with Amsoil. hmmm, Ive done that for 10 years of hard core racing and have supported or been involved with 4 other cars over the same period of time without issues. maybe there is something too it.

mk


Originally Posted by IcemanG17
Speaking from PURE experience....it is NOT fun to buy a "racer" 928 and watch it blow up after 6 trackdays.....ask me how I know...... Build the engine correctly ONCE...& it will last on track.....reliability is far more important than peak power

The current engine in lemons has 24 hours on track.....which is probably about a seasons worth of DE-sprint races....& I am confident the oil will come back perfect...... 100% stock with just a retrograde to the oil style oil sump + a 3/8th pan spacer.....thats it......no accusump, no oil cooler....nothing and no PRESSURE drops in the corners!!! I never ever saw less than 75psi in higher RPM corners (we were taking corners between 3-4000).....with RPM's up higher say 5000 it was near 100psi
Old 03-15-2010, 06:50 PM
  #37  
slate blue
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
slate blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,315
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

As to your two valve engine choices, I have what you want, I built it from scratch and it has heaps of torque not hp. It makes it very easy to drive and with an auto I think torque will be your friend. This is not a stripped out racer, it is my street car that even has its sub woofer and amp in it.




Now my times start at 0 mph unlike the other two where they set their rollout at 5 mph. So the graph looks a bit more in their favour than it really is but those are two very powerful cars mine was up against. My car is around 3100 pounds to 3200 pounds depending how much fuel is in it.

Also at the time the car was hard to get off the line with wheel hop being a problem so I didn't use full throttle till second gear. So if you download from Motor Trend or Car and Driver the GT3 and or Turbo spec sheet which quotes all their times. Compare from 30 mph upwards and you will get an idea of the speed. It can actually match (very closely) the GT3 from 30 mph onwards.

The engine is normally aspirated and 5.o litres.

Greg
Old 03-15-2010, 09:46 PM
  #38  
IcemanG17
Race Director
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,271
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
Gee, doesnt that sound familar????

Almost all the failures that ive seen or heard about, came from suspect engines to start with, and some oil that breaks down at high temp.

So, you basically, found an undamaged engine that was fairly clean and beat the snot out of it with Amsoil. hmmm, Ive done that for 10 years of hard core racing and have supported or been involved with 4 other cars over the same period of time without issues. maybe there is something too it.

mk
MK
I sent the oil our for analysis today...but other than being 18 hours old...I think it will come back fine...... quite an improvement over the last engine that didn't even finish the race!!!!
Old 03-15-2010, 10:30 PM
  #39  
kccampro
Pro
Thread Starter
 
kccampro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The plot thickens... in addition to the M28/11 in the garage, I'm now the proud owner of a 1987 S4 (high mileage). I'm awefully tempted to just swap everyting over to the RS4 project and see what happens... so basically, all options that include a 5.0L are on the table.
Old 03-15-2010, 10:34 PM
  #40  
pcar928fan
Nordschleife Master
 
pcar928fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,337
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

That is what I would do...it will be MUCH, MUCH faster to getting the car back on road and track!

What model year is the racer based on? The only problem that you might encounter is not enough room if you try to put an S4 auto trans in an early chassis...they don't fit. You have to do some cutting. That is what I did... Can't speak to a late 5spd into an early 5spd chassis...
Old 03-15-2010, 10:37 PM
  #41  
kccampro
Pro
Thread Starter
 
kccampro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pcar928fan
That is what I would do...it will be MUCH, MUCH faster to getting the car back on road and track!

What model year is the racer based on? The only problem that you might encounter is not enough room if you try to put an S4 auto trans in an early chassis...they don't fit. You have to do some cutting. That is what I did... Can't speak to a late 5spd into an early 5spd chassis...
It's an '80 body, I'd be putting the manual trans and drivetrain right back in so it would be an '87 S4 motor bolted to a pre-S4 manual drive train which I don't think is an issue.
Old 03-15-2010, 10:40 PM
  #42  
pcar928fan
Nordschleife Master
 
pcar928fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,337
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I think you will be ok with that and I think that is a GREAT idea! Can't wait to see that thing rolling on the street!
Old 03-15-2010, 11:01 PM
  #43  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,150
Received 82 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Iccy928
It's an '80 body, I'd be putting the manual trans and drivetrain right back in so it would be an '87 S4 motor bolted to a pre-S4 manual drive train which I don't think is an issue.
No issues. I have a 78 body, and the 89 motor and an early trans and it all fits. I wanted to do the S4 look as well, but it was painted before I thought about it.



Quick Reply: 928 RS4 Project... needs 378hp



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:57 PM.