Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Help with motor mount

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-2009, 02:48 PM
  #16  
928 at last
Rennlist Member
 
928 at last's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Aurora, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,200
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Thumbs up Good Point

Originally Posted by the flyin' scotsman
True that Rob

I added the 'other rubber failures' as a caution to double check fuel and coolant connections. Fully collapsed MMs cause the engine to drop and rest on the x member. The new MMs allow the engine to 'rock' which may cause an older hose to fail.
Interesting. Never thought that one through, but excellent point. The new "elevation" of the motor back to stock, with the re-established rocking could cause some issues........
I'm just re&re ing the intake/fuel system now so it's past history, but others may want to check after a mount refresh.
Old 12-30-2009, 09:40 PM
  #17  
GregBBRD
Former Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,476 Likes on 1,468 Posts
Default

So, my opinion is slightly different.

Don't play automotive engineer.

Buy the factory mounts.

They lasted 20 years.

How crappy can they be?



Oh yeah...I don't use silicone pan gaskets...either.

And I have tried them, more than once.

Your pan gasket is 20 years old.

How inferior can that be?
Old 12-30-2009, 09:45 PM
  #18  
ROG100
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
ROG100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Double Oak, TX
Posts: 16,836
Received 894 Likes on 340 Posts
Default

I can't afford to pay Greg Brown prices 8>)
So you alter nothing when you build a new engine?
__________________

Does it have the "Do It Yourself" manual transmission, or the superior "Fully Equipped by Porsche" Automatic Transmission? George Layton March 2014

928 Owners are ".....a secret sect of quietly assured Porsche pragmatists who in near anonymity appreciate the prodigious, easy going prowess of the 928."






Old 12-30-2009, 09:51 PM
  #19  
SeanR
Rennlist Member
 
SeanR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 35,700
Received 500 Likes on 267 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
So, my opinion is slightly different.

Don't play automotive engineer.

Buy the factory mounts.

They lasted 20 years.

How crappy can they be?

Bull****, I just replaced a 3 year old set of factory mounts, they were collapsed. But they could have been NOS, who knows.
Old 12-30-2009, 10:44 PM
  #20  
davek9
Rennlist Member
 
davek9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bloomfield, MI
Posts: 5,155
Received 365 Likes on 196 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SeanR
Bull****, I just replaced a 3 year old set of factory mounts, they were collapsed. But they could have been NOS, who knows.
Yes and that is why I chose the Solid newer Ford MM's, the liquid filled MM was a flawed idea IMO w/ minimal benefits.

As for the Silicon Gaskets they are also newer technology over Cork, however greater care must be observed when installing.
Old 12-30-2009, 10:56 PM
  #21  
GregBBRD
Former Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,476 Likes on 1,468 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ROG100
I can't afford to pay Greg Brown prices 8>)
So you alter nothing when you build a new engine?
I alter lots of things...but you know that?

But I don't alter stuff that works really well from the factory. That doesn't make any sense, to me.

I can install a factory pan gasket and not have it even seep for 10 years. That's not a poor design, in my mind.

I tried the silicone pan gaskets...why not??? They might have been the best think since sliced bread!

Because the hardware had to be "finger tight" to not over torque the silicone gasket, the hardware fell out almost as fast as you could replace it. Let me see...add gas, check the oil, and tighten the pan hardware. Good to go for another 300 miles!

That's not a good thing, for my customers. They prefer to pay for a job once and be done with it. That's the "expensive" 928 service that we offer....that you can't afford.

Now...what....5-6 years later...people are talking about installing studs and using locknuts to help with this problem. That's sounds like a good idea....how many people need to redo their original silicone gasket to now make this modification? When that doesn't work, we'll come up with something else.....

Motor mounts...please!

There are a whole bunch of 928s still running around with the stock, original mounts still in them.

And there's a small group of people that have Ford hydraulic mounts that don't really fit...well...they almost fit. You only have to slightly modify things to make them fit. Oh yeah, throw away that stupid safety thing that Porsche made, in case the mount broke, but what does Porsche know?

Oh, by the way...those Ford hydraulic mounts failed after 2 years.

No big deal...we'll experiment with something else for a while...it's not our money?

Sound familiar? Think water pumps. The next "version" will be better! Yeah, we trashed dozens of engines with the first couple of versions....but the next version will definitely be better!

Oh yeah, I also don't use Porken's tensioners!
Old 12-30-2009, 10:56 PM
  #22  
928 at last
Rennlist Member
 
928 at last's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Aurora, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,200
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
So, my opinion is slightly different.

Don't play automotive engineer.

Buy the factory mounts.

They lasted 20 years.

How crappy can they be?



Oh yeah...I don't use silicone pan gaskets...either.

And I have tried them, more than once.


Your pan gasket is 20 years old.

How inferior can that be?
Yours lasted twenty years??? Cool! can I get a set of factory mounts that last that long?

My money's on the solid Fords. I can spend my money and time looking after more critical items. Mind you, I'm one of those who would probably enjoy solid race mounts......

Seriously though, if you're not doing concours, and you want to drive the car without lying under it constantly, the best choice would logically be the longer-lived of the potential choices. The fact that they're by far the most cost-effective solution just makes the choice that much more obvious to me.
Old 12-30-2009, 11:13 PM
  #23  
ROG100
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
ROG100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Double Oak, TX
Posts: 16,836
Received 894 Likes on 340 Posts
Default

Awesome advice - thank you.
Old 12-30-2009, 11:17 PM
  #24  
davek9
Rennlist Member
 
davek9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bloomfield, MI
Posts: 5,155
Received 365 Likes on 196 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=GregBBRD;7183669]I alter lots of things...but you know that?


And there's a small group of people that have Ford hydraulic mounts that don't really fit...well...they almost fit. You only have to slightly modify things to make them fit. Oh yeah, throw away that stupid safety thing that Porsche made, in case the mount broke, but what does Porsche know?

QUOTE]

I have not installed any of the "Liquid" mounts, however:
Fact:
The Ford solid rubber mounts required NO modifications of anything, just bolt them in.
Fact:
The Ford Solid rubber mounts DO haves safety locking plates incase of a failure.

We all install what we are comfortable with, some chose the old standard (like motor oil) and others look to improve the breed.
Old 12-30-2009, 11:56 PM
  #25  
namasgt
Three Wheelin'
 
namasgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 1,675
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I don't know about the MMs, I have not got there yet to buy a set, will probably buy the solid Ford ones, since they are so cheap. Did look at a friends Ford mounts on his 928 and they had open small cracks all the way around, Is that normal? He only changed them like 3 years ago.

About the pan gasket, I am using the factory one because I think the silicon ones are too thin and when you tighten down the nuts or bolts it squishes out from the sides, its not like anyone is gona go under the car and look at it but don't like the look and don't want silicon hanging out inside the block. There is nothing wrong with the factory ones and will probably last 10 years without any oil leaks.
Old 12-30-2009, 11:56 PM
  #26  
jeff spahn
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
jeff spahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Dubuque, IA
Posts: 8,599
Received 400 Likes on 224 Posts
Default

Wow, I really got things flying here didn't I? I was just asking about a low price I saw on some mounts but it seems to have opened up a real can here.

I gonne put in solid aluminum ones that will never fail. Might run a little rough but will never fail
Old 12-31-2009, 01:39 AM
  #27  
GregBBRD
Former Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,476 Likes on 1,468 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=davek9;7183718]
Originally Posted by GregBBRD
I alter lots of things...but you know that?


And there's a small group of people that have Ford hydraulic mounts that don't really fit...well...they almost fit. You only have to slightly modify things to make them fit. Oh yeah, throw away that stupid safety thing that Porsche made, in case the mount broke, but what does Porsche know?

QUOTE]

I have not installed any of the "Liquid" mounts, however:
Fact:
The Ford solid rubber mounts required NO modifications of anything, just bolt them in.
Fact:
The Ford Solid rubber mounts DO haves safety locking plates incase of a failure.

We all install what we are comfortable with, some chose the old standard (like motor oil) and others look to improve the breed.
That's exactly right. Hard to argue with that point of view.

We've all have reasons for what pieces we choose to use. I completely understand and support Roger trying to find products that save us all a buck. Roger may give me crap, but I think he understands why I do what I do. That's the beauty of this forum. We can discuss things and learn from each other.

My problem is that I run a shop and people bring their 928s to me to be fixed. They bring me 2,3,4 page lists of things that they have never been able to have fixed and we fix them. They drive their cars in, fly home, and come back weeks later to get them. They come from all over the country/world. Because of this, I have to use pieces that I know work. I can't create new problems. I need to fix problems. This is a far different thing than somebody swapping in pieces, in their garage, on their own time.

In all fairness, I have not installed a set of solid rubber mounts. I installed one set of the hydraulic Ford mounts and swore I'd not install another...that was not a good solution.

I'll get a set of these solid rubber mounts from Roger and see how they work.
Old 12-31-2009, 01:55 AM
  #28  
docmirror
Shameful Thread Killer
Rennlist Member
 
docmirror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rep of Texas, N NM, Rockies, SoCal
Posts: 19,831
Received 100 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

A few weeks ago Sean and I dropped the x-member on my 86. It had a Ford solid in it that is at least 6 YO and it looked and measured like new. Also had the Porsche designed safety plate clasp in place.

If the Porsche mount were only ~$30 more, I'd use them, or if they were clearly superior to the Ford mount I'd use them. It seems from my experience that neither of these situations exist.
Old 12-31-2009, 02:07 AM
  #29  
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
 
blown 87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GregBBRD


My problem is that I run a shop
I understand that.
Old 12-31-2009, 02:27 AM
  #30  
Rob Edwards
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
 
Rob Edwards's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 17,545
Received 2,728 Likes on 1,327 Posts
Default

I've got a set of solid mounts from Roger for the stroker already installed on the crossmember, so that'll be one local data point for Greg.


Quick Reply: Help with motor mount



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:37 AM.