Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

I got a mailed complaint about my carbon footprint

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-25-2009, 08:44 AM
  #16  
Marine Blue
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Marine Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 16,022
Received 807 Likes on 469 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mongo
Instead I wrote a comment on their 'respond by mail survey' offering to disclose 6 consecutive years of flawless emissions even with 20 year old cats and new aftermarket ones too. I don't think they have a worthy argument against someone that maintains his car religiously.
Now that is a great response.

Originally Posted by M. Requin
It's the "saying I got reported" part that gets to me. Good grief, what crap. Providing an opportunity for some to anonymously harass others with the help of the state just doesn't seem like the way our system should work.
Good Grief is right. These people haven't a clue what it takes to make those batteries used in the Prius and other hybrid cars. It blows my mind how people can be so gullable in this world. Its like a herd of sheep with only a small percentage who really get it.

I wonder if this kind of attitude is also being seen in SoCal, anyone know?
Old 06-25-2009, 09:14 AM
  #17  
928worldwide
Banned
 
928worldwide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

LOL. What a hot pile of crap....
Old 06-25-2009, 09:18 AM
  #18  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,550
Received 2,169 Likes on 1,226 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by heinrich
Dude in Yakima, WA they just enacted an ordinance that makes it illegal to wear thong underwear and other skimpy apparel that can be seen above the pants in public. I guess now we'll NEVER see DR and Jeannie out this way. ****.


I'll come visit you one of these days.......

Originally Posted by Nicole
I don't think getting childish over this would be the answer.

Is the letter justified? If yes, go fix the problem. If no, respond professionally and move on with your life.

There is nothing to gain.
If every 928 ever made was driving around San Fran without CATS, they would still not compare to the real pollutants to California:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environmen...ping-pollution

From that link:
Confidential data from maritime industry insiders based on engine size and the quality of fuel typically used by ships and cars shows that just 15 of the world's biggest ships may now emit as much pollution as all the world's 760m cars. Low-grade ship bunker fuel (or fuel oil) has up to 2,000 times the sulphur content of diesel fuel used in US and European automobiles.
<snip>
Cars driving 15,000km a year emit approximately 101 grammes of sulphur oxide gases (or SOx) in that time. The world's largest ships' diesel engines which typically operate for about 280 days a year generate roughly 5,200 tonnes of SOx.


The tree huggers do not like to talk about studies that have overwhelming shown how much of the pollution in California is from ships coming into your harbors. It's not fashionable to bitch about a ship based based in the Cayman Islands or some other county that has zero pollution regulations. Instead they prefer to send letters like this one to Andy and drive around in their Prius with their noses up in the air.
Old 06-25-2009, 09:51 AM
  #19  
AO
Supercharged
Rennlist Member
 
AO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Back in Michigan - Full time!
Posts: 18,925
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mongo
Apparently there are some up here in the Bay Area that don't take too kindly to cars that aren't Prius' or Smarts. I got a letter in the mail today saying that I was reported for a car that "smokes" while in motion. Funny... I don't remember anything but small puffs of white smoke on the first 30 seconds of start up and other than a small trace of smoke when I go WOT as the LH goes to a different fuel map.

I didn't know this place had an Environmental **** Police that bitches whenever they see a poof of smoke come out of your car. Not to mention that below in the paragraph they are offering to pay me $650 to turn in my car for something more economical. Are you f**king kidding me? I would pay $650 for the finest quality strut brace and beat the person on the head that reported me for not having a homo-erotic Prius.


Rant off. I'll scan the hate mail tomorrow.

As for now, I am now inspired to do a modular setup with my cats and just run straight pipes in addition to my Flowmasters. They want carbon footprint? I'll give them one the size of Germany and the sound of the 4 Horsemen of the Apocalypse at the same time.
What a load of crap. Just ignore it, or find out who they are and call the "cleaning crew."

Originally Posted by heinrich
Dude in Yakima, WA they just enacted an ordinance that makes it illegal to wear thong underwear and other skimpy apparel that can be seen above the pants in public. I guess now we'll NEVER see DR and Jeannie out this way. ****.
I don't recall ever seeing DR wearing thong underwear. Now Jeannie... I dream about it every day.

BTW, the waitresses at the bar in Hell all wear this kind of stuff and I highly encourage it among all our female attendees.
Old 06-25-2009, 09:53 AM
  #20  
Rick Carter
Rennlist Member
 
Rick Carter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 10,134
Received 70 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker-Pschorr


I'll come visit you one of these days.......


If every 928 ever made was driving around San Fran without CATS, they would still not compare to the real pollutants to California:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environmen...ping-pollution

From that link:
Confidential data from maritime industry insiders based on engine size and the quality of fuel typically used by ships and cars shows that just 15 of the world's biggest ships may now emit as much pollution as all the world's 760m cars. Low-grade ship bunker fuel (or fuel oil) has up to 2,000 times the sulphur content of diesel fuel used in US and European automobiles.
<snip>
Cars driving 15,000km a year emit approximately 101 grammes of sulphur oxide gases (or SOx) in that time. The world's largest ships' diesel engines which typically operate for about 280 days a year generate roughly 5,200 tonnes of SOx.


The tree huggers do not like to talk about studies that have overwhelming shown how much of the pollution in California is from ships coming into your harbors. It's not fashionable to bitch about a ship based based in the Cayman Islands or some other county that has zero pollution regulations. Instead they prefer to sent letters like this one to Andy and drive around in their Prius with their noses up in the air.
Thanks Hacker, I didn't know that.
Old 06-25-2009, 10:05 AM
  #21  
Tim Murphy
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Tim Murphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Green Bay Wisconsin
Posts: 951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hacker, I saw that article once before. Pretty incredible.
Old 06-25-2009, 10:07 AM
  #22  
Mongo
Official Bay Area Patriot
Fuse 24 Assassin
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 31,653
Received 117 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

I'm already looking forward to my next offense.

Regardless of aftermarket cats or not, they will need to be replaced again probably as I just diagnosed a 4 cylinder running condition to bad coils. I wonder if any pooled gas in there ate the cats up. Oh well, at least they didn't report the smoking that day when they failed. Prior, means no excuse and a load of Liberal crap going on up here.
Old 06-25-2009, 10:14 AM
  #23  
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
 
blown 87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by heinrich
I agree wholeheartedly
Mongo funny
Old 06-25-2009, 10:24 AM
  #24  
Mongo
Official Bay Area Patriot
Fuse 24 Assassin
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 31,653
Received 117 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker-Pschorr


I'll come visit you one of these days.......


If every 928 ever made was driving around San Fran without CATS, they would still not compare to the real pollutants to California:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environmen...ping-pollution

From that link:
Confidential data from maritime industry insiders based on engine size and the quality of fuel typically used by ships and cars shows that just 15 of the world's biggest ships may now emit as much pollution as all the world's 760m cars. Low-grade ship bunker fuel (or fuel oil) has up to 2,000 times the sulphur content of diesel fuel used in US and European automobiles.
<snip>
Cars driving 15,000km a year emit approximately 101 grammes of sulphur oxide gases (or SOx) in that time. The world's largest ships' diesel engines which typically operate for about 280 days a year generate roughly 5,200 tonnes of SOx.


The tree huggers do not like to talk about studies that have overwhelming shown how much of the pollution in California is from ships coming into your harbors. It's not fashionable to bitch about a ship based based in the Cayman Islands or some other county that has zero pollution regulations. Instead they prefer to send letters like this one to Andy and drive around in their Prius with their noses up in the air.
Sooner or later they will all be named Perez Hilton..
Old 06-25-2009, 10:28 AM
  #25  
dr bob
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
dr bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 20,506
Received 546 Likes on 409 Posts
Default

One thing that's obviously lost in the discussion is the carbon footprint. Cats don't change your carbon footprint, they just change the shape of the gas coming out of the pipes from CO to CO2. The carbon footprint fro the car is defined by the amount of fuel that passes through the motor per mile. Your personal carbon footprint is the total amount of carbon repurposed on your behalf, whether it's fuel for the car or hydrocarbons consumed to keep your computer running and talking, and all the stuff that you use to support that effort.

There's a federal effort to offer tax credits for folks who turn in cars that have high fuel consumption for lower consumtion vehicles. Certain regions of this state with high smog levels broker older cars with higher total pollution for smog 'credits' or offsets for industry. They buy up your car and take credit for getting a gas guzzler off the road, and use those 'saved' tons of emissions to help justify their tons of emissions. The letter you received may be a batch or form letter aimed at specific-aged vehicles in your area.

As far as the 'smoke', remind the complainer that the puff of water vapor they saw following the cold startup is a sure sign that the cats on your car are working just fine, and thanks for reminding you that you are doing your part to reduce harmful pollution.


On the ships-at-sea entering the harbors here, the target is specificaly soot (PM10 and PM100), the visible part of diesel exhaust. Shisp are already encouraged to reduce speed coming to LA harbor to cut those emissions, use lower-sulphur oil in the neighborhood, hook up to shore power when docked so they don't have to run their engines, etc. Slowing the ship adds transit time, and we actaully have no jusridiction outside the three-mile limit from shore. The harbor depts don't want shippers to find other places (like Mexico) to offload, so everything is pretty much done on a voluntary basis now.
Old 06-25-2009, 10:33 AM
  #26  
RicerSchnitzzle
Three Wheelin'
 
RicerSchnitzzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Banished to the SBC Wastelands
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Is there a return address on the letter? Just sayin'.

A big bag of burning coal on their front lawn should show them a nice carbon footprint...
Old 06-25-2009, 10:33 AM
  #27  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by heinrich
Dude in Yakima, WA they just enacted an ordinance that makes it illegal to wear thong underwear and other skimpy apparel that can be seen above the pants in public. I guess now we'll NEVER see DR and Jeannie out this way. ****.

But going commando with a Brazilian is still legal, no?
Old 06-25-2009, 10:34 AM
  #28  
AaronSweat
Instructor
 
AaronSweat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 133
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I think that it's funny that some of these so called green people ride around with their noses up in Vespa scooters that put out more hydrocarbons than most cars. Most of those scooters have little or no regulation on how much they pollute the environment, and that's not even the vintage ones, which are probably worse.
Old 06-25-2009, 10:42 AM
  #29  
JD928_S4
Advanced
 
JD928_S4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Buffalo, NY or Albany, NY
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would say one thing... Do you have any idea the environmental impact producing a new car has? How about driving the cars we have already spent millions of dollars in research, development and production on, instead of needing to upgrade to the newest model every other year so our neighbors think we are environmentally friendly?... I am all for saving the environment, but no one ever seems to see the whole picture they just look at the emissions that exit the tail pipe.

-Rant over lol
Old 06-25-2009, 10:42 AM
  #30  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,550
Received 2,169 Likes on 1,226 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dr bob
There's a federal effort to offer tax credits for folks who turn in cars that have high fuel consumption for lower consumtion vehicles.
On paper looked like an ok idea, in reality falls quite short.

How many people driving around in a "clunker" $3500-$4500 car can afford or will be approved for a new car loan? They should have included used cars that are of a certain age (like five years). It was a proposed addition to the bill that was cut.


Originally Posted by AaronSweat
I think that it's funny that some of these so called green people ride around with their noses up in Vespa scooters that put out more hydrocarbons than most cars. Most of those scooters have little or no regulation on how much they pollute the environment, and that's not even the vintage ones, which are probably worse.


+1 - they are two strokes for christ sake!!!!


Quick Reply: I got a mailed complaint about my carbon footprint



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:51 PM.