Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Converting a K-Jet/CIS car to electronic fuel injection...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-25-2008, 03:13 AM
  #1  
L8 APEKS
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
L8 APEKS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Converting a K-Jet/CIS car to electronic fuel injection...

Hey guys,

I am looking into the possibility of ditching the K-Jet setup in favor of Megasquirt on a '79.

I understand I'll need some sensors off later model cars for computer input (coolant temp, TPS), as well as intake runners with standard injector holes, and fuel rails.

Can anyone help me out with which years/models I'd be best to pull these parts from? Any info appreciated! Thanks in advance!
Old 10-25-2008, 12:24 PM
  #2  
wildwestsydney
Racer
 
wildwestsydney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south shore MA
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would not hesitate to go the Megasquirt route. I sucessfully installed a MSI on my 1998 suzuki DR 350 dual sport motorcycle. I did not go for ignition control just fuel. I was very happy with the project. I saved a ton of gas money using the bike to back and forth to work. That was one of the deciding factors in taking the plunge into a 928, I figured that I could always Megasquirt it if I had an ECU failure. I would look into getting a set of injectors from summit. There are tons of fuel rail kits that could be adapted. Summit also have a generic inline high PSI electric fuel pump for EFI apps for around a $100. If you go for it you will have a super reliable very tunable ECU. I went with a MSI for the cost. I bought a kit and soldered it together my self, it was not a big deal.
Old 10-25-2008, 12:31 PM
  #3  
L8 APEKS
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
L8 APEKS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah...many friends have used it with amazing results, normally finding ~20hp in the process too. A guy did this in a '76 MBZ 450SL, the engine is very similar to the early 928 lump.

If I do race this in NASA, Megasquirt is currently a 7-point hit. That only leaves me room for tires and a partial exhaust. We'll see!
Old 10-25-2008, 12:37 PM
  #4  
heinrich
928 Collector
Rennlist Member

 
heinrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 17,269
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

lizard931 here has excellent experience with this stuff.
Old 10-25-2008, 01:43 PM
  #5  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,150
Received 82 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

7 points? Well, that answers my question then.
Old 10-25-2008, 02:03 PM
  #6  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,150
Received 82 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

If its 7 points then I would do spark as well, and make sure you get the best out of the MS system. Maybe even run ethanol for an extra 5% power (if you up the compression)
Old 10-25-2008, 02:18 PM
  #7  
Lizard928
Nordschleife Master
 
Lizard928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Abbotsford B.C.
Posts: 9,600
Received 34 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

I have a 928 running on MSII V3.0 right now, and I am sure that there will be some lads in the seattle area who will be running MS soon as well.

I have 36-1 timing rings which replace the AC pulley (or could be run with the AC pulley, but would cause alittle missalignment of the other belts). This timing ring would enable you to run EDIS which is THE way to go for ign systems imo.

As well I would NOT bother trying to get/find Porsche sensors for the IAT and CLT. Just go with Gm sensors.

You can purchase them very cheap with a pigtail from www.diyautotune.com

And you can definetly find a few more ponies out of the engine.
Old 10-25-2008, 02:28 PM
  #8  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,150
Received 82 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lizard931
I have a 928 running on MSII V3.0 right now, and I am sure that there will be some lads in the seattle area who will be running MS soon as well.

I have 36-1 timing rings which replace the AC pulley (or could be run with the AC pulley, but would cause alittle missalignment of the other belts). This timing ring would enable you to run EDIS which is THE way to go for ign systems imo.

As well I would NOT bother trying to get/find Porsche sensors for the IAT and CLT. Just go with Gm sensors.

You can purchase them very cheap with a pigtail from www.diyautotune.com

And you can definetly find a few more ponies out of the engine.
Has your friend installed that flywheel I had the timing ring put on? Did it work? I was going to do it again.
Old 10-25-2008, 03:12 PM
  #9  
Lizard928
Nordschleife Master
 
Lizard928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Abbotsford B.C.
Posts: 9,600
Received 34 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Brendan, the timing ring you had on that flywheel would never have worked. It interfered with parts on the engine. We ended up pressing it off, and putting on a factory 100-1 ring
Old 10-25-2008, 03:53 PM
  #10  
L8 APEKS
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
L8 APEKS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lizard931
I have a 928 running on MSII V3.0 right now, and I am sure that there will be some lads in the seattle area who will be running MS soon as well.

I have 36-1 timing rings which replace the AC pulley (or could be run with the AC pulley, but would cause alittle missalignment of the other belts). This timing ring would enable you to run EDIS which is THE way to go for ign systems imo.

As well I would NOT bother trying to get/find Porsche sensors for the IAT and CLT. Just go with Gm sensors.

You can purchase them very cheap with a pigtail from www.diyautotune.com

And you can definetly find a few more ponies out of the engine.
Colin,

Thanks so much for chiming in!

At this point, I was not going to use MS for ignition; I was only going to use MS for fuel. It all depends on what happens as I start tearing this thing down to see what kind of shape it's in. I'm already inclined to do a quick driveway hone and re-ring w/ mains and rods just for gits and shiggles. No better way to get to know an engine, right!?

The chap I saw who converted the 450SL left the air metering assembly atop the engine; but he removed the flap door. Did you do something similar? I would appreciate any pictures or write-ups if you published any. Let me know! Thanks again!
Old 10-25-2008, 05:00 PM
  #11  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,150
Received 82 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lizard931
Brendan, the timing ring you had on that flywheel would never have worked. It interfered with parts on the engine. We ended up pressing it off, and putting on a factory 100-1 ring
Do you still have it? It just needed to be cut down a bit probably. Its a good idea, and makes for a solid signal - it just needed work. What you are saying is that the teeth would need to be shorter, right?

I have another 84 flywheel with no teeth (a bit larger) and will do the same thing, probably, for the 82. Putting the wheel on the front of the engine interferes with using an SC crank pulley.

Have you gotten your VEMS yet?
Old 10-25-2008, 06:27 PM
  #12  
L8 APEKS
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
L8 APEKS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

PS...after reviewing the rules, MS for fuel only may only be a +2 point mod.
Old 10-25-2008, 06:50 PM
  #13  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,589
Received 2,204 Likes on 1,243 Posts
Default

Almost any EFI will require a crank sensor - something these motors do not have a provision for. You could use the green wire, not the best solution since it's driven off the timing belt and not always 100% accurate versus a block mounted sensor.

I'm having Todd add an OEM 928 crank sensor to the lower bellhousing of my 79, and I'm having an 85/86 timing wheel installed on my flywheel in the proper orientation for where the sensor will be. This will allow me to use any year block with this flywheel / lower bellhousing.

I'm converting my 79 to LH/EZF from a EuroS using the twin dizzy. With any luck I'll actually start this project this winter. I already have all the parts.
Old 10-25-2008, 09:04 PM
  #14  
wildwestsydney
Racer
 
wildwestsydney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south shore MA
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I hope you take the plunge to MS EFI. It sounds like you allready have some support. Great advice on the GM sensors thats what I used on my bike. The MS is a MAP based system so I don't think it should be a big deal to get a good signal for that from the 928 spider manifold.
Old 10-25-2008, 09:09 PM
  #15  
L8 APEKS
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
L8 APEKS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker-Pschorr
Almost any EFI will require a crank sensor - something these motors do not have a provision for. You could use the green wire, not the best solution since it's driven off the timing belt and not always 100% accurate versus a block mounted sensor.

I'm having Todd add an OEM 928 crank sensor to the lower bellhousing of my 79, and I'm having an 85/86 timing wheel installed on my flywheel in the proper orientation for where the sensor will be. This will allow me to use any year block with this flywheel / lower bellhousing.

I'm converting my 79 to LH/EZF from a EuroS using the twin dizzy. With any luck I'll actually start this project this winter. I already have all the parts.
I thought the crank sensor was NOT required for MS fuel? Just a MAP or MAF, CTS, TPS?


Quick Reply: Converting a K-Jet/CIS car to electronic fuel injection...



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:42 PM.