Holber race car gets a new engine. Progress Report
#541
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
I tend to believe you. I didnt see much on my 84 part euro 4.7 going from 12 to 12.5, as it was only about 3hp. But, i have to imagine going from 11:1 to 12.5 might be a bigger potential for gain.
Randy Prout has a devek 6.4 liter with the same set up as me, but with big valve heads. he was at around 380rwhp and just fuel tuning alone with the shark tuner, they got it to 420rwhp. Im trying to find out where the fuel was and ended up . I should know something tomorrow when Randy pulls out the old dyno runs. (devek, mustang dyno and shark tune)
mk
Randy Prout has a devek 6.4 liter with the same set up as me, but with big valve heads. he was at around 380rwhp and just fuel tuning alone with the shark tuner, they got it to 420rwhp. Im trying to find out where the fuel was and ended up . I should know something tomorrow when Randy pulls out the old dyno runs. (devek, mustang dyno and shark tune)
mk
On a friend's car, he went from 11.5:1 to 12.5:1. The car went from 378 whp to 416 whp with no other changes.
I don't think you will hurt anything at 12.5:1. I'm running 12.5:1 in my turbo Audi at 28 psi of boost and it doesn't knock. Granted bore size is quite a bit different, but I'm also making quite a bit more power and running a lot more ignition advance. I'm just saying it's free power there for the taking.
I don't think you will hurt anything at 12.5:1. I'm running 12.5:1 in my turbo Audi at 28 psi of boost and it doesn't knock. Granted bore size is quite a bit different, but I'm also making quite a bit more power and running a lot more ignition advance. I'm just saying it's free power there for the taking.
#542
Thanks for the generous offer, but I dont fully understand the problem as well as the possible solution as to make a decision to do something like this. Right now, i dont think there is a problem worth addressing right now. I certainly think there are plenty of other projects that might take priority, should i gain additional resourses to do them.
As far as G force limits, there are none right now. Can make the car pull the G force over a greater period of time with a better suspension or finer tuning? Possible . Right now, pulling 1.5 gs is basically as much as any car on DOTs. Fortunately, at tracks like Laguna where it is pretty smooth, i can race pretty well, even with a shot suspension.
Again, thanks for the offer. As always, I appriciate the support!
Mark
As far as G force limits, there are none right now. Can make the car pull the G force over a greater period of time with a better suspension or finer tuning? Possible . Right now, pulling 1.5 gs is basically as much as any car on DOTs. Fortunately, at tracks like Laguna where it is pretty smooth, i can race pretty well, even with a shot suspension.
Again, thanks for the offer. As always, I appriciate the support!
Mark
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fv53RbvgfGc
Porsche started working on this a bit over two years ago. Coincidence? I think not. That is about the time of the embarrassing (for them) serious 928 windage control discussions on Rennlist.
Despite Jason Kavanaugh's (Edmunds.com) assurances, this machine will simulate only certain 1.4G transient maneuvers. I do not believe Porsche engineers spent two years developing a serious test rig and left out some hydraulic rams.
#544
Vielleicht aber meine Ich nicht, mein Herr.
Edit: Daimler-Chrysler was also directly asked whether they would allow some of my products to be dynoed in combination with some other very well known manufacturer's products to see if they would correct deficiencies in same.
They refused. Lots of politics in aftermarket parts.
#546
By Kevin Johnson
I know for a fact that Porsche didn't develop this rig, there was a write up in Race Engine Technology, I could find it if I have to but it was invented for general use in testing oil systems, not just Porsche.
Greg
Despite Jason Kavanaugh's (Edmunds.com) assurances, this machine will simulate only certain 1.4G transient maneuvers. I do not believe Porsche engineers spent two years developing a serious test rig and left out some hydraulic rams.
Greg
#547
Drifting
I can draw no similarities between Porsche and SRT. Manufacturers do read forums more than you think. It's either for marketing purposes or to find employees who blab confidential information.
#548
If you can find no similarities between SRT and Porsche I am not sure what to say to you.
Edit: I remember growing up and in Dearborn the nextdoor neighbor had a boarder who was an engineer at Ford. He was provided a car and he would pour over that car in his extra time and fix every little detail. There was always a fight at Ford to see who would get his vehicles after he received a new one. He lived on Cromwell street off of Outer Drive.
#549
A battle of the magazines: http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=127890
They appear to be reporting what they were told by Porsche itself.
My guess is that Porsche designed or specced it. GKN may make rods for Porsche and many other clients. In what sense is a GKN engineer working on a Porsche rod design by extension a Porsche engineer.
Porsche loves to do engineering on contract for other firms so I am sure the rig would not be idle.
I would be interested in that article. I met the publisher last year -- very nice guy.
#550
Drifting
#551
Combined with the overwhelming evidence that they tried to fix this problem over and over and over and did not would be strong reason for embarassment. Look at the patents that Porsche has received since then focusing on air entrainment and oil control. They were determined that this would never happen again.
Suddenly, circa 2005, 2006, they decide to engineer -- have engineered -- whatever -- a complicated test rig to publicly re-evaluate (re-emphasize?) Nordschleife testing that they had already done on their integrated dry sump. This to try to remove all doubt from Porschephiles' minds that such problems are in the distant past. There is no substitute once again.
I do not think that is a stretch at all. Peg it under your own stated monitoring aegis of marketing because that is exactly what it is.
But back to Mark. Mark, seeing that engine do the mamba is what a good suspension will subject the engine oil to. It is a visual aid just as Porsche's marketing arm intended.
#552
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by Kevin Johnson
This to try to remove all doubt from Porschephiles' minds that such problems are in the distant past.
A fruedian slip?
Just yanking your chain, Kevin.
#553
Seeing that you caught it you would likely appreciate the cognates in vision science with ambiguous figures. Once interpreted it is difficult to impossible to remove the imposition of structure (though yielding to perceptual flickering). Procrustus in action. He was a man far ahead of his time.
In pyscholinguistics it would be related to parsing of continuous strings of sound into sentences and the loss of babel to language.
But I like both interpretations so hold no guilt in that chain yanking please.
#554
Rennlist Member
That's why I still have that monkey in the back room banging out the Kama Sutra on my trusty Remington. If he comes through, I don't know what I'll do for the illustrations.
#555
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Mark: Hope it goes super well this weekend. I was planning on coming down Sunday, but those plans have been dashed. Best of luck!