Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Holber race car gets a new engine. Progress Report

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-01-2008, 11:57 PM
  #541  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

I tend to believe you. I didnt see much on my 84 part euro 4.7 going from 12 to 12.5, as it was only about 3hp. But, i have to imagine going from 11:1 to 12.5 might be a bigger potential for gain.

Randy Prout has a devek 6.4 liter with the same set up as me, but with big valve heads. he was at around 380rwhp and just fuel tuning alone with the shark tuner, they got it to 420rwhp. Im trying to find out where the fuel was and ended up . I should know something tomorrow when Randy pulls out the old dyno runs. (devek, mustang dyno and shark tune)

mk


Originally Posted by 123quattro
On a friend's car, he went from 11.5:1 to 12.5:1. The car went from 378 whp to 416 whp with no other changes.

I don't think you will hurt anything at 12.5:1. I'm running 12.5:1 in my turbo Audi at 28 psi of boost and it doesn't knock. Granted bore size is quite a bit different, but I'm also making quite a bit more power and running a lot more ignition advance. I'm just saying it's free power there for the taking.
Old 10-02-2008, 01:29 PM
  #542  
Kevin Johnson
Racer
 
Kevin Johnson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
Thanks for the generous offer, but I dont fully understand the problem as well as the possible solution as to make a decision to do something like this. Right now, i dont think there is a problem worth addressing right now. I certainly think there are plenty of other projects that might take priority, should i gain additional resourses to do them.

As far as G force limits, there are none right now. Can make the car pull the G force over a greater period of time with a better suspension or finer tuning? Possible . Right now, pulling 1.5 gs is basically as much as any car on DOTs. Fortunately, at tracks like Laguna where it is pretty smooth, i can race pretty well, even with a shot suspension.

Again, thanks for the offer. As always, I appriciate the support!

Mark
2009 Porsche 911 Engine Oil Sump Test Rig

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fv53RbvgfGc

Porsche started working on this a bit over two years ago. Coincidence? I think not. That is about the time of the embarrassing (for them) serious 928 windage control discussions on Rennlist.

Despite Jason Kavanaugh's (Edmunds.com) assurances, this machine will simulate only certain 1.4G transient maneuvers. I do not believe Porsche engineers spent two years developing a serious test rig and left out some hydraulic rams.
Old 10-02-2008, 01:42 PM
  #543  
123quattro
Drifting
 
123quattro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Farmington Hills, MI
Posts: 2,973
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Very cool test rig. Working for a car company I'd also say with a good bit of certainty that this forum had zero impact on getting that thing built.
Old 10-02-2008, 01:47 PM
  #544  
Kevin Johnson
Racer
 
Kevin Johnson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 123quattro
Very cool test rig. Working for a car company I'd also say with a good bit of certainty that this forum had zero impact on getting that thing built.
Yes, like the 2003 SRT4 coming out with an integrated pan gasket scraper after forum members asked me to design one. Close timing? Coincidence?

Vielleicht aber meine Ich nicht, mein Herr.

Edit: Daimler-Chrysler was also directly asked whether they would allow some of my products to be dynoed in combination with some other very well known manufacturer's products to see if they would correct deficiencies in same.

They refused. Lots of politics in aftermarket parts.
Old 10-02-2008, 03:10 PM
  #545  
928autobahndreamer
Rennlist Member
 
928autobahndreamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 1,698
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Porken, I think you just found out how to push Mark's buttons.
Old 10-02-2008, 07:39 PM
  #546  
slate blue
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
slate blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,318
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

By Kevin Johnson

Despite Jason Kavanaugh's (Edmunds.com) assurances, this machine will simulate only certain 1.4G transient maneuvers. I do not believe Porsche engineers spent two years developing a serious test rig and left out some hydraulic rams.
I know for a fact that Porsche didn't develop this rig, there was a write up in Race Engine Technology, I could find it if I have to but it was invented for general use in testing oil systems, not just Porsche.

Greg
Old 10-02-2008, 08:59 PM
  #547  
123quattro
Drifting
 
123quattro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Farmington Hills, MI
Posts: 2,973
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Kevin Johnson
Yes, like the 2003 SRT4 coming out with an integrated pan gasket scraper after forum members asked me to design one. Close timing? Coincidence?
I can draw no similarities between Porsche and SRT. Manufacturers do read forums more than you think. It's either for marketing purposes or to find employees who blab confidential information.
Old 10-03-2008, 09:44 AM
  #548  
Kevin Johnson
Racer
 
Kevin Johnson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 123quattro
I can draw no similarities between Porsche and SRT. Manufacturers do read forums more than you think. It's either for marketing purposes or to find employees who blab confidential information.
Originally Posted by 123quattro
Very cool test rig. Working for a car company I'd also say with a good bit of certainty that this forum had zero impact on getting that thing built..
I know that employees of manufacturers read forums -- that's you instantiated. But I sell parts to engineers working for OEMs on a regular basis. I assure you that many engineers working for OEMs read forums and have pride in the marque they help build.

If you can find no similarities between SRT and Porsche I am not sure what to say to you.

Edit: I remember growing up and in Dearborn the nextdoor neighbor had a boarder who was an engineer at Ford. He was provided a car and he would pour over that car in his extra time and fix every little detail. There was always a fight at Ford to see who would get his vehicles after he received a new one. He lived on Cromwell street off of Outer Drive.
Old 10-03-2008, 10:01 AM
  #549  
Kevin Johnson
Racer
 
Kevin Johnson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Greg Gray
I know for a fact that Porsche didn't develop this rig, there was a write up in Race Engine Technology, I could find it if I have to but it was invented for general use in testing oil systems, not just Porsche.

Greg
Hi Greg,

A battle of the magazines: http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=127890

They appear to be reporting what they were told by Porsche itself.

My guess is that Porsche designed or specced it. GKN may make rods for Porsche and many other clients. In what sense is a GKN engineer working on a Porsche rod design by extension a Porsche engineer.

Porsche loves to do engineering on contract for other firms so I am sure the rig would not be idle.

I would be interested in that article. I met the publisher last year -- very nice guy.
Old 10-03-2008, 03:50 PM
  #550  
123quattro
Drifting
 
123quattro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Farmington Hills, MI
Posts: 2,973
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Kevin Johnson
If you can find no similarities between SRT and Porsche I am not sure what to say to you.
What I meant was Porsche is a manufacturer. SRT is a small in house tuning arm for Chrysler that is not subject to some of the normal design and release rules.
Old 10-03-2008, 04:40 PM
  #551  
Kevin Johnson
Racer
 
Kevin Johnson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 123quattro
What I meant was Porsche is a manufacturer. SRT is a small in house tuning arm for Chrysler that is not subject to some of the normal design and release rules.
I think that there was a lot of extraordinary information brought out into the worldwide Rennlist discussions including that Porsche actively threatened race teams that wanted to campaign the 928 with withdrawal of all support. That really happended at least here in the USA. The discussions encompassed the 928 and the 944 and 968 engines -- a good twenty year swath.

Combined with the overwhelming evidence that they tried to fix this problem over and over and over and did not would be strong reason for embarassment. Look at the patents that Porsche has received since then focusing on air entrainment and oil control. They were determined that this would never happen again.

Suddenly, circa 2005, 2006, they decide to engineer -- have engineered -- whatever -- a complicated test rig to publicly re-evaluate (re-emphasize?) Nordschleife testing that they had already done on their integrated dry sump. This to try to remove all doubt from Porschephiles' minds that such problems are in the distant past. There is no substitute once again.

I do not think that is a stretch at all. Peg it under your own stated monitoring aegis of marketing because that is exactly what it is.

But back to Mark. Mark, seeing that engine do the mamba is what a good suspension will subject the engine oil to. It is a visual aid just as Porsche's marketing arm intended.
Old 10-03-2008, 04:54 PM
  #552  
Charley B
Rennlist Member
 
Charley B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Patterson, Ca
Posts: 4,373
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kevin Johnson
This to try to remove all doubt from Porschephiles' minds that such problems are in the distant past.
Leaving the conclusion that they still exist in the present?

A fruedian slip?

Just yanking your chain, Kevin.
Old 10-03-2008, 10:59 PM
  #553  
Kevin Johnson
Racer
 
Kevin Johnson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Charley B
Leaving the conclusion that they still exist in the present?

A fruedian slip?

Just yanking your chain, Kevin.
No, it is actually open to both interpretations. Shaw would love it.

Seeing that you caught it you would likely appreciate the cognates in vision science with ambiguous figures. Once interpreted it is difficult to impossible to remove the imposition of structure (though yielding to perceptual flickering). Procrustus in action. He was a man far ahead of his time.

In pyscholinguistics it would be related to parsing of continuous strings of sound into sentences and the loss of babel to language.

But I like both interpretations so hold no guilt in that chain yanking please.
Old 10-03-2008, 11:08 PM
  #554  
Charley B
Rennlist Member
 
Charley B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Patterson, Ca
Posts: 4,373
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kevin Johnson
In pyscholinguistics it would be related to parsing of continuous strings of sound into sentences and the loss of babel to language.
That's why I still have that monkey in the back room banging out the Kama Sutra on my trusty Remington. If he comes through, I don't know what I'll do for the illustrations.
Old 10-04-2008, 02:19 AM
  #555  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Mark: Hope it goes super well this weekend. I was planning on coming down Sunday, but those plans have been dashed. Best of luck!


Quick Reply: Holber race car gets a new engine. Progress Report



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:51 PM.