Question for those who have 10" rims in front.
#1
Pro
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Who is running 10" rims on the front of their cars that can answer what has to be modified or what rim specs will allow one to do this?
#5
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: central cal
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have 17 x 10, et 65. At stock ride height, no real issues other than rolling the fender lip. My car is lowered, and at full lock, it barely scrapes the control arm with the inside of the rim, but thats about it. If you autocross, or drive sideways, drifting, you may get contact between the fender lip and the tire as you steer into the slide. (opposite lock--- yeehaw!) My tires are 255's in front, and they are slightly stretched over the width of the rim. I think a 265 would fit ok, but I'd have to do some hammering to get a 275 in without going deeper on the offset.
hope that helps
hope that helps
#6
Race Car
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Dan
'91 928GT S/C
![EEK!](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
Last edited by dprantl; 04-19-2008 at 05:02 PM.
#7
Pro
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thanks
Brian.
Trending Topics
#8
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
one of my kinesis is 10", but i still run the 275 x 35x18 up there.
Its 7.5" backspacing (instead of 8" backspacing) Im really slammed at 109mm ride hight, but its not too bad on the street. welll, its not very good, but mostly due to fender rub because the car is so low for U turns. on the track, no rubbing. If there was a finger of space on the fender, it would be fine. (ie 135mm of ride hight) But, its got to be 7.5" of backspacing
mk
Its 7.5" backspacing (instead of 8" backspacing) Im really slammed at 109mm ride hight, but its not too bad on the street. welll, its not very good, but mostly due to fender rub because the car is so low for U turns. on the track, no rubbing. If there was a finger of space on the fender, it would be fine. (ie 135mm of ride hight) But, its got to be 7.5" of backspacing
mk
#9
Race Car
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
one of my kinesis is 10", but i still run the 275 x 35x18 up there.
Its 7.5" backspacing (instead of 8" backspacing) Im really slammed at 109mm ride hight, but its not too bad on the street. welll, its not very good, but mostly due to fender rub because the car is so low for U turns. on the track, no rubbing. If there was a finger of space on the fender, it would be fine. (ie 135mm of ride hight) But, its got to be 7.5" of backspacing
mk
Its 7.5" backspacing (instead of 8" backspacing) Im really slammed at 109mm ride hight, but its not too bad on the street. welll, its not very good, but mostly due to fender rub because the car is so low for U turns. on the track, no rubbing. If there was a finger of space on the fender, it would be fine. (ie 135mm of ride hight) But, its got to be 7.5" of backspacing
mk
Dan
'91 928GT S/C
![EEK!](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
#10
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hi, I've run 255's no problem, 265's would be tight. Full steering radius aswell.
re. heavier steering, I don't find it an issue, but obviously running 255' instead of the stock 225's will make it a heavier feel when parking etc.
Adrian
re. heavier steering, I don't find it an issue, but obviously running 255' instead of the stock 225's will make it a heavier feel when parking etc.
Adrian