Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

928 Racers...roll cage cost ???s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-05-2008, 12:41 PM
  #16  
FlyingDog
Nordschleife Master
 
FlyingDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Not close enough to VIR.
Posts: 9,429
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike Simard
Another decision is what to do with the roof? To weld the tubes at top you have 3 choices:
Cut access holes.
Remove the entire roof.
Leave tubing farther away.
There are two other choices:
The Mitch Piper way, which is to make the main hoop and front downpipes 3-5" short, sit the cage on the floor of the car, weld the tubes, lift the cage into place, and weld boxes made up plate under the tubes.
My way (not done yet, just planned), which is to make all the cage legs 1/4" short, drill holes in the floor directly below them, assemble the cage in the car but 6" below where it will eventually be, weld the tubes, lift it into place sliding 1/4" plate under the legs, then weld it in place.

Piper Motorpsorts charges ~$3500 for a 944 cage and a 928 cage would be more expensive due to more tubing and possibly thicker tubing (depending on rules and final weight).

Last edited by FlyingDog; 03-05-2008 at 01:30 PM. Reason: clarification
Old 03-05-2008, 12:43 PM
  #17  
atb
Rennlist Member
 
atb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 4,869
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

I noticed that Ken's cage has no cross bracing between the kickbacks. Is this typical?
Old 03-05-2008, 12:51 PM
  #18  
FlyingDog
Nordschleife Master
 
FlyingDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Not close enough to VIR.
Posts: 9,429
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by atb
I noticed that Ken's cage has no cross bracing between the kickbacks. Is this typical?
It is not required. The are many different ways of adding extra bracing. Some people find the X or / in their rearview mirror to be distracting so they find other ways to brace (ie: extra downtubes or side triangulation).

After spending 3 hours in Synergy Racing's shop yesterday, I wish we could build FIA/Grand Am style cages for NASA/SCCA/PCA use without having to get an FIA or Grand Am logbook for the car. Those fully triangulated cages are amazingly better (at least in theory) than the standard hoop based cages.
Old 03-05-2008, 01:18 PM
  #19  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,946
Received 141 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

a couple of comments . on the driver side, i would angle a bar up to attach near the shoulder area of the driver. the nascar style bars are a good idea on the driver side. I dont think you need the bar across the dash board, as the stock bar might be sufficient, if it is also joined to the down bars. the 928 chassis is already pretty rigid, so i dont know if the x'ing in the rear is really nessesary. I guess it really depends if you are running a 500rwhp 928 racer on slicks vs a 300rwhp racer on DOTs.

Great shots and some nice designs. Thanks for posting.

Mk
Old 03-05-2008, 01:22 PM
  #20  
Jim bailey - 928 International
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Jim bailey - 928 International's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Anaheim California
Posts: 11,542
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Mark the stock dash cross "bar" is a thin sheet metal tube it has little strength.
Old 03-05-2008, 01:26 PM
  #21  
kccampro
Pro
 
kccampro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Great thread... taking notes, thanks for the pics
Old 03-05-2008, 01:48 PM
  #22  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,946
Received 141 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

I thought anderson used the savaged 928s for these bars to make his cage out of them

I guess i retract that advice. I thought they were good (but small diameter) steel tubes.

MK


Originally Posted by Jim bailey - 928 International
Mark the stock dash cross "bar" is a thin sheet metal tube it has little strength.
Old 03-05-2008, 02:04 PM
  #23  
Jim bailey - 928 International
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Jim bailey - 928 International's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Anaheim California
Posts: 11,542
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The hard part of this is you spend hours removing a few pounds of undercoating only to start adding back the weight of each and every foot of roll bar ! How much is enough ?? safety vs performance when is it "good enough". In designing you must determine how force will transfer from one tube to another ...Squares are weak , T is bad , triangles are good , tubes with bends just want to bend ... as mentioned and shown even small gussets added where tubes join makes a much stronger connection with very small increases in weight. Usually only the main hoops and diagonal must be of a specific size and thickness so using thinner tube for the "extra" braces is an option. Build the whole thing to NASCAR standards and it will weigh 3,400 lbs
Old 03-05-2008, 02:12 PM
  #24  
FlyingDog
Nordschleife Master
 
FlyingDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Not close enough to VIR.
Posts: 9,429
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I forget whether it was here or on NASAForums that somebody said their (nice, well braced) 944 cage used 140-something pounds of tubing and plates. That is all of the asphalt floor insulation and the complete A/C system.
Old 03-06-2008, 07:00 AM
  #25  
Black Sea RD
Former Vendor
 
Black Sea RD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How about following the lead from a Factory 996 Cup Car? Their cages seem well designed and seem to work quite well for all the heavy racing they do.

One thing I would really watch is the bar above the driver's door. High and tight against the roof/body to keep your helmeted head away and under it is a must. The helmet adds a few inches of dimension all around and should be factored in while building a cage.

Cheers,
Constantine
Old 03-06-2008, 10:02 AM
  #26  
69gaugeman
Nordschleife Master
 
69gaugeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,164
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Just subscribing.

Please carry on.
Old 03-06-2008, 10:12 AM
  #27  
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A data point:
I paid $1500 for labor and materials, with the interior in place, way back in 2000.
Old 03-06-2008, 10:26 AM
  #28  
Mike Simard
Three Wheelin'
 
Mike Simard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Adam and Tom, you guys are really fornunate to have a cage guy like that. that's alot of nice work for the $. You should gather up all the 928s you can find and have him do cages while he's still willing!

Darrin, your instrament panel looks like mine. Great minds...
Attached Images  
Old 03-06-2008, 11:01 AM
  #29  
FlyingDog
Nordschleife Master
 
FlyingDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Not close enough to VIR.
Posts: 9,429
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Constantine
How about following the lead from a Factory 996 Cup Car? Their cages seem well designed and seem to work quite well for all the heavy racing they do.
FIA style cages are generally not allowed in NASA/SCCA unless the cage is factory or the car has a logbook from a sanctioning body that specifically allows FIA style cages (ie: Grand Am or IMSA). I am trying to find out if GTS Challenge rules (which supercede NASA rules) allow for newly built FIA cages.
Old 03-06-2008, 01:02 PM
  #30  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,946
Received 141 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

I was under the impression that the cage requirements for NASA and SCCA club, were mininimums. why would a FIA cage not be allowed. what is the major difference? (bars from cage tied to front shock towers, etc?)

Here are some shots of my simple cage. notice the halo bar up top. saves some time . I would have liked tohave the side bars bent outward like nascar style bars. kind of a modified "ladder" bar, with out so many of the ladder pieces. as it is now, it protects the shoulder area, but i would like to have one more cross member around the driver seat area to strengthen it up a bit.

mk

Originally Posted by FlyingDog
FIA style cages are generally not allowed in NASA/SCCA unless the cage is factory or the car has a logbook from a sanctioning body that specifically allows FIA style cages (ie: Grand Am or IMSA). I am trying to find out if GTS Challenge rules (which supercede NASA rules) allow for newly built FIA cages.
Attached Images     


Quick Reply: 928 Racers...roll cage cost ???s



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:52 AM.