Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists
View Poll Results: What is causing the tracking issue?
Missing washer on roller arm
23.81%
Washer for roller arm is on the outside instead of inside
23.81%
None of the above/other (fill in by posting)
33.33%
Surfridermason wouldn't approve of this poll because no one can be insulted by it. (Hi Mase )
19.05%
Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll

Diagnose this TB tracking issue for fun and profit (except the profit)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-28-2008, 08:17 PM
  #46  
Bill51sdr
Fleet of Foot
Rennlist Member
 
Bill51sdr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: We are there!(San Diego)
Posts: 10,780
Received 49 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Adam G.
Hi everyone - just came in from the garage and this is what I found:

1) The shoulder bolt has a slight bend to it
2) The tensioner arm bushings were worn and partially gone - left "shiny" wear areas on the shoulder bolt
3) Believe it or not, the belt wore a slight groove in the backside of the tensioner arm!
4) The tensioner roller is bad, very bad - when I spin it, it squeaks and has a rough feel to it
5) The tensioner boot crumbled when I removed the tensioner arm
6) The grounding strap was broken

And finally, the waterpump is a Laso unit....

I will be replacing all bushings, rollers, etc. to get the TB system back on spec.

Should I leave the waterpump in or replace it now with a "non-Laso" rebuilt or new unit?

Pictures to follow - thank you for your input!
Adam
#'s 2 & 3 are exactly what happened to mine. If the WP is still good and not too much time/mileage on it, I'd leave it alone.
Old 01-28-2008, 08:37 PM
  #47  
JKelly
Burning Brakes
 
JKelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Swift
I voted "None of the above". Had the same thing happen to a previous 928 and it was the two "#3's" in that diagram someone posted. Those bushings wore out on mine and allowed the tensioner to tilt enough to cause the belt to do exactly what yours appears to be doing; rub against the tensioner arm.
Same here.

Worn bushings --> Tensioner slightly tilts --> Belt creeps --> Belt rubs tensioner arm --> Shaft bolt bends --> Belt shreds --> Valve job.

An occasional peek down through the passenger side inspection hole can help detect a creeping belt. The belt should not be riding at the front edge of the cam gear.
Old 01-28-2008, 08:41 PM
  #48  
Bill51sdr
Fleet of Foot
Rennlist Member
 
Bill51sdr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: We are there!(San Diego)
Posts: 10,780
Received 49 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JKelly
Same here.
Worn bushings --> Tensioner slightly tilts --> Belt creeps --> Belt rubs tensioner arm --> Shaft bolt bends --> Belt shreds --> Valve job.

An occasional peek down through the passenger side inspection hole can help detect a creeping belt. The belt should not be riding at the front edge of the cam gear.
Caught mine prior to disaster. Still lost about 1/8" off the leading edge of the timing belt though. No warning or sounds to indicate there was a problem, just dumb luck I happened to look inside the timing cover vents and see a LOT of black rubber dust, WTF???
Old 01-28-2008, 08:43 PM
  #49  
Lizard928
Nordschleife Master
 
Lizard928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Abbotsford B.C.
Posts: 9,600
Received 34 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

good time for a Porken tensioner upgrade!!!!!

solve the issue once and for all
Old 01-28-2008, 09:07 PM
  #50  
JKelly
Burning Brakes
 
JKelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Swift
Caught mine prior to disaster. Still lost about 1/8" off the leading edge of the timing belt though. No warning or sounds to indicate there was a problem, just dumb luck I happened to look inside the timing cover vents and see a LOT of black rubber dust, WTF???
Luckily, I caught mine too. The glaring downward spiral was unnerving.
Old 01-28-2008, 09:58 PM
  #51  
Mike Frye
Craic Head
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
Mike Frye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Jersey Shore, USA
Posts: 8,795
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

It never ceases to amaze me how these supposedly 'delicate' or 'hard to maintain' cars can run with only 3/4 of their belt left, a bent shoulder bolt and a belt tension reading of 3.0.

I am duly impressed. So the answer was 3 none of the above.

Adam, you're saying everything was installed properly it was just worn out bushings that led to the other problems because of lack of attention?

FWIW: I know you and your attention to detail, if you do the WP for no other reason than to replace the bolts and get some anti-seize in there, it will be worth it.
Old 01-28-2008, 10:10 PM
  #52  
Adam Geist
Rennlist Member
 
Adam Geist's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Not that far from the Jersey Shore
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mike,

Everything was in its place. I think the last time the covers were off, only the TB belt and the WP were replaced (laso?). Everything was old, dry and brittle - most likely a short-cut by the last mechanic.

You know I am sitting here debating on whether to pull the WP or not. Should I wait a couple of years for the the next TB replacement or just go ahead and replace the WP now.....

...........with anti-seize on the bolts, of course!
Old 01-28-2008, 10:13 PM
  #53  
Mike Frye
Craic Head
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
Mike Frye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Jersey Shore, USA
Posts: 8,795
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Pics of the damage:





Old 01-28-2008, 10:17 PM
  #54  
Mike Frye
Craic Head
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
Mike Frye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Jersey Shore, USA
Posts: 8,795
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Adam G.
Mike,

Everything was in its place. I think the last time the covers were off, only the TB belt and the WP were replaced (laso?). Everything was old, dry and brittle - most likely a short-cut by the last mechanic.

You know I am sitting here debating on whether to pull the WP or not. Should I wait a couple of years for the the next TB replacement or just go ahead and replace the WP now.....

...........with anti-seize on the bolts, of course!
Since we've taken on the roll of fire prevention experts in these parts, I just hope we'll have enough weekends to get all of this other stuff done.

Do you think that arm is OK or are you going to replace it?
Old 01-28-2008, 10:18 PM
  #55  
Landseer
Rennlist Member
 
Landseer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 12,149
Received 367 Likes on 213 Posts
Default

If it tracked that way a while, plus if it sat for any period of time, I'd strongly consider replacing.

Water pump bearing, seal and impeller don't seem overengineered on most cars, this included. If it goes after retensioning, which can happen, you might be re-belting it as well.

My PO retensioned on a car that sat for a while. Pump failed quickly thereafter. Right after title changed hands.
Old 01-28-2008, 10:25 PM
  #56  
Adam Geist
Rennlist Member
 
Adam Geist's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Not that far from the Jersey Shore
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think this car sat for some time. I picked it up from a shore town which is the reason for the salt-like deposits on the TB/WP parts.

I think the arm is strong enough for future duty based on the slight amount of wear - I'm open to suggestions.

Should I replace the tensioner arm?

Adam
Old 01-29-2008, 01:14 PM
  #57  
Bill51sdr
Fleet of Foot
Rennlist Member
 
Bill51sdr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: We are there!(San Diego)
Posts: 10,780
Received 49 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

I kept using the tensioner arm on mine, just replaced the bushings and pivot bolt.
Old 01-29-2008, 01:30 PM
  #58  
Mike Frye
Craic Head
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
Mike Frye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Jersey Shore, USA
Posts: 8,795
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I'd probably re-used that arm too. I can't really tell how deep it's cut in, but the stress on that arm isn't front to back, it's lateral. I can't imagine it's weakened enough by that groove to have an effect.
Old 01-29-2008, 06:56 PM
  #59  
Landseer
Rennlist Member
 
Landseer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 12,149
Received 367 Likes on 213 Posts
Default

Me too. Same tensioner arm.

But the pump I'd change.
Old 01-29-2008, 07:01 PM
  #60  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 928drvr86.5
Yes, but washer #12 omitted from between the tensioner arm and the idler roller on the WP will change the position of the entire arm, moving it inward toward the WP, and cause the outside edge of the belt to rub on the arm as shown. That will also throw the tensioner roller off it's correct track.

Additionally, the circlip was already inplace on the roller as shipped from the supplier in both instances that i did my timing belt, once from 928intl and the other time from 928SP. I can't see why anyone would remove the circlip if the roller is already shipped with it inplace.
If washer 12 is missing, I think the idler roller would hit the waterpump. Every main tensioner roller that I have received did not have the circlip installed. It's a separate PN and there is no "kit" with both PNs. Oh, well. Neither of us were right.


Quick Reply: Diagnose this TB tracking issue for fun and profit (except the profit)



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:27 AM.