Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Different shock absorber between front and rear

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-26-2008, 07:22 PM
  #16  
oups59
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
oups59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Shefford,Quebec
Posts: 1,899
Received 50 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

OK the rear are ready to install

Before a couple of hours to clean a bit around.
Attached Images  
Old 01-26-2008, 07:35 PM
  #17  
oups59
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
oups59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Shefford,Quebec
Posts: 1,899
Received 50 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

I am a bit confuse. Probably my English again

I am using Tony's website to reinstall my rear coilover and it seems wrong. If I remember correctly, the two conical washers are on both side of the "middle part" like Earl and Gary mention and not on both side on the shock absorber.

From Tony's site:
The botom of the coilover sits in the open space in the middle ...between the two "conical" washers.



From Earl Gillstrom and Gary Knox writeup:
BE SURE to properly position the two conical washers on either side of
the “middle” part of the suspension arm, and the flat washer between the
rear of the strut and the rear part of suspension arm before inserting the
large long bolt holding bottom of strut.
This looks like the proper way. Is it?
Old 01-26-2008, 07:37 PM
  #18  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default



Those look adjusted up a little high on the threaded collar, especially the lower one. When I change shocks but reuse the springs, if the ride height and corner balance was good, I set the adjuster at the same point on the collar as before (or if the shocks are a different brand with differnt adjusters I set them to get the same static spring length).

Also, others have said and I have found that setting the adjusters the same on both sides, even if ride height is off a few mm, results in closer corner balance. Sounds a little too simple to be true, but it has worked for me. Anway, you can check things after you get them on, but your starting adjustments look off to me.
Old 01-26-2008, 07:38 PM
  #19  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

This picture is wrong. Hold on a minute.

Old 01-26-2008, 07:42 PM
  #20  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

The conicals are shown incorrectly. They fit in the concave sides of the hub carrier, not around the shock, as that picture implies.

So, it goes:

FROM THE REAR---
Large end washer
lower control arm
Smaller washer
lower shock mount
conical washer fit into concavity on hub carrier
hub carrier
conical washer fit into concavity on hub carrier
lower control arm
Large end washer
Old 01-26-2008, 07:46 PM
  #21  
Peter F
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Peter F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sweden, Stockholm
Posts: 1,242
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

The conicals are shown backwards. They fit in the concave sides of the hub carrier, not around the shock, as that picture implies.
Yepp like Bill says, left washer should face the hub carrier and same for the right one.
Then you should be good to go.

/Peter
Old 01-26-2008, 07:52 PM
  #22  
david928
Racer
 
david928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Seattle, Wa. USA
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

While replacing my shocks, I drove for a couple of weeks with new Bilsteins in the rear and the old Boges in the front. All I noticed is that there was still oscillation in the front going over bumps at speed, but less than before. These new shocks are doing their job!
Old 01-26-2008, 07:55 PM
  #23  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Here's a pic of the final assembly. The conicals are hidden on either side of the center hub carrier. Don't get concerned if you see some unfilled space between some parts, like between the front lower control arm and the hub carrier. It's occupied by protruding bushing cores. As long as the parts are in the right order and the end nuts are torqued to 103 ft lbs, you are good.

Old 01-26-2008, 09:11 PM
  #24  
the flyin' scotsman
Rennlist Member
 
the flyin' scotsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Southern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 10,710
Received 53 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Luc............Bill is correct.

We've had this discussion before and Tony even chimed in that he'd fix his site........we'll have to remind him.

Your using the original springs?
Old 01-27-2008, 09:35 AM
  #25  
oups59
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
oups59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Shefford,Quebec
Posts: 1,899
Received 50 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Ball
... but your starting adjustments look off to me.
Bill,

That's the way they were before. Height was good then. I will recheck this spring but the difference between the two surprised me.

Thanks for your help :-)
Attached Images   
Old 01-27-2008, 09:37 AM
  #26  
oups59
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
oups59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Shefford,Quebec
Posts: 1,899
Received 50 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by the flyin' scotsman

.....Your using the original springs?
Malcolm,

Yes I decided to reuse them.



Quick Reply: Different shock absorber between front and rear



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:32 PM.