Master VIN thread
#31
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
#32
Race Car
Hello,
I have just noticed that can see WP0ZZZ92ZBS840001 on the "front hood plate" pictured on the owner manual of my car.
Also what seems to be the second to last 1989 ROW GT, or last 1989 ROW GT (it depends if the last 1989 ROW 928 is an S4 or a GT) is currently for sale in Germany, according to Porsche web site.
This is WP0ZZZ92ZKS842487.
Samuel
I have just noticed that can see WP0ZZZ92ZBS840001 on the "front hood plate" pictured on the owner manual of my car.
Also what seems to be the second to last 1989 ROW GT, or last 1989 ROW GT (it depends if the last 1989 ROW 928 is an S4 or a GT) is currently for sale in Germany, according to Porsche web site.
This is WP0ZZZ92ZKS842487.
Samuel
#33
Instructor
If it's of any use to you, I'll send you the spreadsheet.
#34
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
#35
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
I went to look at a very late GTS today, follow this link and scroll down http://www.thegallerybrummen.nl/nl/collectie/
It is advertised as the second to last GTS built, but serial # is 456, so apparently the fourth to last (of ROW models).
Nonetheless it is a beautiful car. Very nice lines, no rub strips, no sunroof.
Some weird stuff going on under the hood though. Looks line ECU connectors in the engine bay?
It is advertised as the second to last GTS built, but serial # is 456, so apparently the fourth to last (of ROW models).
Nonetheless it is a beautiful car. Very nice lines, no rub strips, no sunroof.
Some weird stuff going on under the hood though. Looks line ECU connectors in the engine bay?
#37
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
That's really weird, the engine's in, but the LH harness isn't connected? Someone did a bangup job of installing the air filter as well.
#38
Team Owner
I would be checking the engine code and serial number it looks like someone forgot to feed the LH/EZK connectors through the firewall so in this case the engine may have to be lifted a bit to do this .
It may also be able to be done with the engine in position but it will be a pain
It may also be able to be done with the engine in position but it will be a pain
#39
Nordschleife Master
#40
Race Car
I bet the person that installed the engine in there had no idea where those connectors were supposed to go. Could there be any other explanation? Too funny!
Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
#41
Drifting
First post for this 4 week old first time 89 928 porsche owner vin #WPOZZZ92ZKS842476 and I have the import papers that it came from japan, so that makes the guess that there were some 89 japan vins that belong in the missing ones in the first post, true. I look forward to learning all about my new to me porsche. Its up on jack stands in my garage in Alberta Canada (that time of year) By the way, I'm a mechanic and look forward ?? to replacing my rear main engine seal, I think. Hmm, now I think a manual might help
Last edited by 928mac; 10-21-2009 at 02:37 AM.
#42
Nordschleife Master
Welcome to the forum.
A paper copy of the manual works best for me, or pages printed from the CD set of manuals. Roger at 928srus.com has the latter.
Start a fresh thread and post some pictures of your car when you can.
A paper copy of the manual works best for me, or pages printed from the CD set of manuals. Roger at 928srus.com has the latter.
Start a fresh thread and post some pictures of your car when you can.
#43
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Now only unknowns remain ROW '87-88 and Japan '85-88 MY upper limits and perhaps pre '82 lower limits for all markers.
#44
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Some new data came available from fairly reliable source. Several VIN ranges updated with higher upper limit. Additional '94 ROW GTS was real surprise. Four cars lost from ROW '89 MY production.
#45
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Latest info I have is that KS842484 is last '89 MY ROW VIN. Is KS842487 really correct data?