Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Remote Mount Turbo Dynograph 399hp/438 ft.lbs 10.63 psi

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-13-2007, 01:33 PM
  #16  
Lizard928
Nordschleife Master
 
Lizard928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Abbotsford B.C.
Posts: 9,600
Received 34 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

12.2:1 AFR is common for alot of the "tuner" cars to run with high boost.
Old 07-13-2007, 01:43 PM
  #17  
Fabio421
Man of many SIGs
Rennlist Member
 
Fabio421's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 8,722
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

At 10psi of boost pressure I would think you would be seeing about 454 hp at the wheels. And you should have gained way more than 7 HP by bumping the boost up 2 psi from 8 to 10. I think the turbo may be too small for your application. It seems that it can't flow enough at high RPM and is becoming a restriction. Then again, what do I know

As for the intercooler, with the turbo mounted that far back, I would bet you are shedding quite a bit of heat through the compressor outlet tube on its way to the engine. Are you using aluminum or steel for this piping? Adding an intercooler to this setup will add a heck of alot of volume to fill. Normaly an intercooler is a no brainer, but with this much charge piping to fill it may be better to leave it off for now.

Do you have the exhaust piping to the turbo ceramic coated or wrapped to retain heat?

In closing I say good job. I saw pictures of this install a long time ago and wondered what happened to it. Keep it up and you will work out all the details. Another interesting boost option for 928's. Keep us posted as to your progress.

Last edited by Fabio421; 07-13-2007 at 07:55 PM.
Old 07-13-2007, 02:58 PM
  #18  
Z
Rennlist Member
 
Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SwayBar
But there's no way one would want to go that lean with FI safety-wise.
Some brand new turbo cars are run at 14.7: AFR, from the factory, with more boost than this, and with a warranty.
Old 07-13-2007, 03:01 PM
  #19  
heinrich
928 Collector
Rennlist Member

 
heinrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 17,270
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Z
Some brand new turbo cars are run at 14.7: AFR, from the factory, with more boost than this, and with a warranty.
Exactly. The little 944 turbo runs 2 bar right from the factory, with 65lb injectors ... and that's with a 1977 VW Bus engine basically.
Old 07-13-2007, 03:02 PM
  #20  
heinrich
928 Collector
Rennlist Member

 
heinrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 17,270
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fabio421
...Are you using aluminum or steel for this piping?....
CF and steel
Old 07-13-2007, 04:05 PM
  #21  
Courtshark
Rennlist Member
 
Courtshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Crofton, MD
Posts: 1,941
Received 37 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Forget intercooling... go with water injection to cool the charge air. It will flatten out those HP waves in the upper RMPs fo sho.
Old 07-13-2007, 07:13 PM
  #22  
89 928 turbo
Instructor
 
89 928 turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Good comments Fabio....

"At 10psi of boost pressure I would think you would be seeing about 454 hp at the wheels. And you should have gained way more than 7 HP by bumping the boost up 2 psi from 8 to 10. I think the turbo may be too small for your application. It seems that it can't flow enough at high RPM and is becoming a restriction. Then again, what do I know

As for the intercooler, with the turbo mounted that far back, I would bet you are shedding quite a bit of heat as through the compressor outlet tube on its way to the engine. Are you using aluminum or steel for this piping? Adding an intercooler to this setup will add a heck of alot of volume to fill. Normaly an intercooler is a no brainer, but with this much charge piping to fill it may be better to leave it off for now.

Do you have the exhaust piping to the turbo ceramic coated or wrapped to retain heat?"

..........You have our final punch list down pretty well....We have the exhaust presently wrapped with manifold tape to the Turbo in the rear to maintain heat......454hp at that level boost is about right, so we are only 50 or so out....your right about the RMT shedding heat on the way up to the front of the car. What we have measured is at 5-6 lbs, the air at the turn of the carbon fibre elbow is 20-30 degrees over ambient...that likely changes significantly at 10.6 and higher. Air in = Air out.........we are working on a more efficient crank ventilation system with Louie's advice. The bump from 8-10 lbs should have yielded more...we anticipated it would push us over 400. AFR is a little conservative at 11.5 to 12ish on the recommendation of several of our friends who build turbo cars for a living ........ http://horsepowerconnection.com/.

We think there is some help in some final timing adjustments, but finding the turbo's work a little different than the SC cars.....we tune for "high boost" 12lbs of boost at WOT and have a "low" boost setting at some lower number and WOT, and end up going a little rich....with open loop.

STS is going to go over our numbers a bit too.....just to backcheck. The wheel is rated to 600 hp so we are pretty confident with that, but depending on sizing for the exhaust side, is the shift in the power curve. We have worked with three different sizing....S-Med-L...the smallest reduced the lag time but ran out on the high end, the largest did just the opposite and it was sluggish for street driving. The middle of the road is where we are targeting, but it will be an choice for anyone to make. The two pound fade needs to be located......boost controller QC, unknown leak, wastegate seating....?

we'll get there.......
Old 07-13-2007, 07:20 PM
  #23  
89 928 turbo
Instructor
 
89 928 turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Intercooling..........

Less of an issue at lower boost levels, don't like putting things in front of the radiators....we are working with Snowperformance... http://www.snowperformance.net/ on a methanol solution.

they seem to be one of the best around and we have that enormous windshield washer reseviour just wasting away........I just hate drilling holes in the throttle body....but it will help solve a lot of the higher boost issues, protect the engine a lot more.

We are going to sort out the other issues first though, because I don't want to mask a problem with chemicals unless it solves them.
Old 07-13-2007, 10:43 PM
  #24  
SwayBar
Rennlist Member
 
SwayBar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago Bears
Posts: 3,560
Received 339 Likes on 233 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Z
Some brand new turbo cars are run at 14.7: AFR, from the factory, with more boost than this, and with a warranty.
Is that at WOT?

If so, then surely the factory compensated with a lower compression ratio, cam-timing specific for a turbo, etc, etc. Also, they were not going for max hp either since running stoich at WOT will not produce as much power as 12.5:1.

Hmmm, on the other hand though, if this is a direct injection engine, then that's a whole other world I know nothing about, as well as it's implications with respect to forced induction tuning.

Let's have some link-age, man!

Back at the ranch though, our 928's have none of the above.
Old 07-13-2007, 11:09 PM
  #25  
Tom. M
Deleted
Rennlist Member
 
Tom. M's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,469
Received 200 Likes on 120 Posts
Default

Actually..JT's motor was built with boost in mind...the CR is 9:1..and ring tolerances were adjusted to compensate for boost.....

he should be able to boost 10psi without too much of an issue..

I think the stock 951 is 8:1 ?....

Later,
Tom
89Gt(former rear turbo GT )
Old 07-13-2007, 11:14 PM
  #26  
Jim R.
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Jim R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Long Island and Lake George, NY
Posts: 917
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Nice work guys, I was wondering what happened to this project.

Jim
Old 07-14-2007, 12:29 AM
  #27  
NickT
Three Wheelin'
 
NickT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Central New Jersey, where 287 and 78 meet.
Posts: 1,656
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Are there any pictures of this setup? Sounds very interesting.
Old 07-14-2007, 01:56 AM
  #28  
Fabio421
Man of many SIGs
Rennlist Member
 
Fabio421's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 8,722
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NickT
Are there any pictures of this setup? Sounds very interesting.
Click the link that was posted at the begining of the thread. There are pics there.
Old 07-14-2007, 01:59 AM
  #29  
atb
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
atb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 4,869
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

he should be able to boost 10psi without too much of an issue..
Dude, warranty is voided at anything above 7.5 psi.
Old 07-14-2007, 02:36 AM
  #30  
Fabio421
Man of many SIGs
Rennlist Member
 
Fabio421's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 8,722
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

You should see a reduction in inlet temps if you change to aluminum piping on the compressor outlet side.

BTW, your website doesn't seem to be working fully. Maybe its just not ready yet.

Thanks for sharing guys.


Quick Reply: Remote Mount Turbo Dynograph 399hp/438 ft.lbs 10.63 psi



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:00 PM.