Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

running lean of stoich - lean is not the enemy, stoich is!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-09-2007, 08:33 PM
  #76  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Actually, I think Mark is right about the vacuum behavior being to drop idle fuel pressure. Once on the gas and the plate opens, the vacuum source, which is just past the throttle plate goes atmospheric.
Old 02-09-2007, 11:13 PM
  #77  
BrianG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
BrianG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Edmonton, Ab
Posts: 2,286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Ball
Actually, I think Mark is right about the vacuum behavior being to drop idle fuel pressure. Once on the gas and the plate opens, the vacuum source, which is just past the throttle plate goes atmospheric.
Sorry Bill.... but that's not correct... every inch of the induction tract is at essentially the same pressure (vacuum/boost) value, from the throttle plate to the intake valve. That pressure is proportional to the throttle position. The only circumstance where "atmosphereic" pressure is the correct value is at WOT.

I would challenge anyone to predict the actual (different) vacuum values at various points along the intake tract, if I'm wrong......
Old 02-10-2007, 02:01 AM
  #78  
scott863
Pro
 
scott863's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just when you think you know quite a bit, someone brings up STOICH, thought perhaps Stoich was a nasty tech guy, or some questionable area of central cal!
Old 02-10-2007, 03:20 AM
  #79  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BrianG
Sorry Bill.... but that's not correct... every inch of the induction tract is at essentially the same pressure (vacuum/boost) value, from the throttle plate to the intake valve. That pressure is proportional to the throttle position. The only circumstance where "atmosphereic" pressure is the correct value is at WOT.

I would challenge anyone to predict the actual (different) vacuum values at various points along the intake tract, if I'm wrong......
OK, I'll hook my vacuum/boost gauge up to the same line as the FPR and do the experiment in the morning. Since the SC is not in the car in the moment, it should be valid.
Old 02-10-2007, 03:49 AM
  #80  
BrianG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
BrianG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Edmonton, Ab
Posts: 2,286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Ball
OK, I'll hook my vacuum/boost gauge up to the same line as the FPR and do the experiment in the morning. Since the SC is not in the car in the moment, it should be valid.
Excellent idea. Remember, we are talking about "seady state" data points, so note each "throttle position" after 5+ seconds at that position.

(if you think this conversation is nuts, just wait until someone launches off on "transitional pressures")

One must use some care in attaching to a vacuum port on the throttle body. I believe that there is at least one "timed" vacuum port on the throttle body. This is a port that is actually AHEAD of the throttle blade. This type of port is generally used for an ignition timing signal. If you tap this type of vacuum port you will find "near-0" vacuum at idle, and a sudden jump to high (10+") vacuum at tip-in. The vacuum with then behave normally and fall proportionally as the throttle continues to open.

Last edited by BrianG; 02-10-2007 at 04:04 AM.
Old 02-10-2007, 05:13 AM
  #81  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Yes, there are more than one port on the throttle body. I have it hooked up correctly. Doing a little more reading about throttle position and manifold vacuum, it seems maybe my memory and Mark are going to be wrong.
Old 02-10-2007, 10:08 AM
  #82  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,412
Received 1,591 Likes on 1,039 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BrianG
One must use some care in attaching to a vacuum port on the throttle body. I believe that there is at least one "timed" vacuum port on the throttle body. This is a port that is actually AHEAD of the throttle blade. This type of port is generally used for an ignition timing signal. If you tap this type of vacuum port you will find "near-0" vacuum at idle, and a sudden jump to high (10+") vacuum at tip-in. The vacuum with then behave normally and fall proportionally as the throttle continues to open.
For S4s (except MK's), the FPR/FPDs are hooked to the port behind the plate. The tank-venting valve is hooked to the port in front of the plate. The air pump is hooked to a port on the bottom of the throttle body but I've never investigated its position relative to the throttle plate.

I'm glad BB's going to do the test. I was about to go out last night at midnight when I saw these posts and find a 928 to test (shouldn't be hard) to confirm what I wrote in an earlier post. It was 9 degrees outside and the garage's not much warmer. CA is better for winter testing. Dat's fo sure.
Old 02-10-2007, 01:48 PM
  #83  
BrianG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
BrianG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Edmonton, Ab
Posts: 2,286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Ball
Yes, there are more than one port on the throttle body. I have it hooked up correctly. Doing a little more reading about throttle position and manifold vacuum, it seems maybe my memory and Mark are going to be wrong.
Not "wrong" Bill.......... just "at variance with the facts".
Old 02-10-2007, 01:54 PM
  #84  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 165 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

You have have to issues here . german to english translation and 928 vs 911.
emperical testing has some value here. (and some basic logic)

if im wrong, I will be the first to admit it. in fact, i would love to know more about the system. I am no expert on the topic. im just reporting on how ive used the system and short cuts to my advantage in racing. what about the fuel cut off switch, why do i have it disconnected. obvioulsy the engineers had a good reason to design it right? well i dont use it for a very good reason

mk

Originally Posted by a4sfed928
Well once you surpass the understanding the design engineer had when he designed it there is no room for debate.
Old 02-10-2007, 02:01 PM
  #85  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 165 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

you must have forgotten , PV/NRT.
also, the air mass moves to differential pressure. the pressure will never be the same all the way through the system it will be different levels of gradients based on location and speeds of the air based on diameters. its not as simple as you think. the throttle plate as it starts to open, has a very fast rate of flow, for which several dynamics are happening. the venturi effect. the port location is key the fact that on the 84s US, there is a port that drives the timing advance and a port or a few ports on the other side of the throttle plate that drives the fuel regs and other idle vacuum driven systems.
Mk

Originally Posted by BrianG
Sorry Bill.... but that's not correct... every inch of the induction tract is at essentially the same pressure (vacuum/boost) value, from the throttle plate to the intake valve. That pressure is proportional to the throttle position. The only circumstance where "atmosphereic" pressure is the correct value is at WOT.

I would challenge anyone to predict the actual (different) vacuum values at various points along the intake tract, if I'm wrong......
Old 02-10-2007, 02:03 PM
  #86  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 165 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

let me attach the VERY accurate Sunx sensor that I have been using to determine pressures around the exterior of the car for aerodynamic analysis.

ill put it on a few parts of the intake if i can find holes to tap on and show you that you couldnt be further from the truth

first off

Mk

Originally Posted by BrianG
Sorry Bill.... but that's not correct... every inch of the induction tract is at essentially the same pressure (vacuum/boost) value, from the throttle plate to the intake valve. That pressure is proportional to the throttle position. The only circumstance where "atmosphereic" pressure is the correct value is at WOT.

I would challenge anyone to predict the actual (different) vacuum values at various points along the intake tract, if I'm wrong......
Old 02-10-2007, 02:26 PM
  #87  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 165 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

The throttle plate on the throttle body is strattled by 2 ports. one on the atomopheric side and one on the manifold side. the outside port will not have any vacuum generated until some fllow is passing, only because it is in the ventruri area of the throttle body. it is used for timing advance on the other older cars. the faster the flow, the more the vacuum here.

The other port on the manifold side, gets near manifold vacuum, until the plate opens. if you see a throttle body, you can see that the port is located at the widest point of where the throttle plate opens. this means there will be a differential pressure of the atomospheric side and and the manifold side. it will be like a gradient bubble around that area. the pressure drops around it and at a part throttle condition, the opening is only an inch or so from the outside pressure. It cant be athmospheric and it cant be under as much vacuum as the manifold. its somewhere in between. the wider it gets. air speed will slow as it opens, though density and temp of the air will change. again, air moves to differential pressure. the outside pressure is pushing on the throttle body. once it opens, the flood gates are open. the only reason you dont have max power at a crack of the throttle, is that it has a pressure drop across it. even at max throttle, the entire intake is a series of pressure drops.
so, you will never have the same vacuum in all areas of the intake.

all someone needs to do, is get vacuum pressure at the throttle body port we are talking about. then, take vacuum off the line that the brake booster gets vacuum from. look at idle and then compare at part throttle . you will see my point then!

MK

Originally Posted by BrianG
Excellent idea. Remember, we are talking about "seady state" data points, so note each "throttle position" after 5+ seconds at that position.

(if you think this conversation is nuts, just wait until someone launches off on "transitional pressures")

One must use some care in attaching to a vacuum port on the throttle body. I believe that there is at least one "timed" vacuum port on the throttle body. This is a port that is actually AHEAD of the throttle blade. This type of port is generally used for an ignition timing signal. If you tap this type of vacuum port you will find "near-0" vacuum at idle, and a sudden jump to high (10+") vacuum at tip-in. The vacuum with then behave normally and fall proportionally as the throttle continues to open.
Old 02-10-2007, 02:29 PM
  #88  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 165 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

my vacuum port driving the fuel regulators attach just behind the throttle plate, like everyone elses and the 84US.
i think the tank venting port is actually on the vacuum side of the manifold to have those vapors injected to the intake, using a little valve that is controlled by vacuum on the vacuum side of the throttle plate.

MK


Originally Posted by worf928
For S4s (except MK's), the FPR/FPDs are hooked to the port behind the plate. The tank-venting valve is hooked to the port in front of the plate. The air pump is hooked to a port on the bottom of the throttle body but I've never investigated its position relative to the throttle plate.

I'm glad BB's going to do the test. I was about to go out last night at midnight when I saw these posts and find a 928 to test (shouldn't be hard) to confirm what I wrote in an earlier post. It was 9 degrees outside and the garage's not much warmer. CA is better for winter testing. Dat's fo sure.
Old 02-10-2007, 04:12 PM
  #89  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 165 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

So, to fully understand what is going on with the throttle body, here are some pics.

Second two pictures: the tiny ports that i have shown on the top of the throttle body side (idle screw side) lead to the vacuum retard) it is on the top (manifold ) side of the throttle plate, but once you just crack the throttle, it actually becomes on the bottom of the throttle plate. (so, certainly no vacuum there, except for some venturi effect) One picture is closed with me blowing air into the port, and the other one is with the throttle slightly opened (cracked at best) and you can see the port is now actually on the other side of the throttle plate!

1st picture: the larger port on the vacuum side (manifold side or top side) of the throttle plate sees vaccum at idle. once you are a little past idle conditions, its very close to the outside ambient pressure, less the losses of the AFM and throttle plate. after that the vacuum will get progressivly higher as you get toward the intake valves in the heads! so you can easily see that there will not be a large amount of vacuum after idel conditions, as at idle, the throttle plate is closed and all the air is passed through the idle screw opening.

Ill get some very accurate readings from my Sunx sensor of this off the vacuum port that drives the fuel regs at idle as well as a couple of other emission devices. all throttle bodies have this port near the throttle plate, even my S4!

MK
Attached Images     
Old 02-10-2007, 05:38 PM
  #90  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,412
Received 1,591 Likes on 1,039 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
1. if you saw a full throttle switch open, the fuel air ratios would still be hunting full rich to full lean
The 'hunting' behavior you describe is I thinkapplicable for idle and steady-throttle application only. I have hooked up an ARM 1 to the 02 sensor output and seen that the hunting only occurs at idle or steady-throttle. The hunting stops if the throttle is moving. I have not however observed the behavior carefully enough to be certain of this. Nor have I disabled my WOT switch to determine what it would look like at WOT with no WOT signal.

But, I am certain that the hunting behavior is periodic and increases in frequency with RPM. At high RPMs the hunt is very fast - 10+ cycles per second. Unless the sample frequency of the EGA employed by a dyno is quite a bit higher the dyno-generated a/f chart isn't going to reflect the hunting.

And in either case, the dyno chart I saw with a near-constant 14.7 a/f ratio 'returned to normal' when the WOT switch was replaced.

2. as far as formating the posts, it looked readable to me, with the darker and altered text. i havent learned how to do your fancy format to have the interactive discussion. sorry. teach me how with a PM
Quoting selections is easy. It works like bolding and italicizing text. When you hit the reply-to button the 'old' text is wrapped in a "quote tag"
HTML Code:
[QUOTE=original poster] some text [/QUOTE]
There are two ways to break up a quoted post so that you can respond point-by-point.

1) delete the quote tags, remove any text you don't want to quote, select the text you do want to quote, and then hit the "bubble" button on the right-most side above the text pane. This button is in the same line of buttons as the "bold", "italics" and other buttons.

2) The other, more efficient way is to insert your own quote tags to break up the text into chunks and insert your text. Thusly:
HTML Code:
[/QUOTE] insert response to first point [QUOTE]
.

For example this post looks, behind the scenes, like what's below:

HTML Code:
[QUOTE=mark kibort] ... your first point  
 
A 'close quote' tag I inserted: 
[/QUOTE] 
 
My response 
 
An 'open quote' tag I inserted: 
[QUOTE] your last point 
 
and the original 'close quote' tag inserted when I hit reply-to 
[/QUOTE] 
 
Followed by my response 
 


Quick Reply: running lean of stoich - lean is not the enemy, stoich is!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:27 PM.