Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Supermodel humbles CLK 55

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-22-2007, 03:50 PM
  #1  
bd0nalds0n
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
bd0nalds0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Diego, CA USA
Posts: 1,868
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default Supermodel humbles CLK 55

I did a little stoplight to stoplight vs. a CLK 55 yesterday on my way to breakfast. The guy was probably in his late 40s and it was a new car that didn't even have plates on it yet.

To be fair, he was having traction problems as I edged away from him--I could hear his tires chirp chirp chirping as I assume his traction control kept retarding whatever it needed to eliminate the wheel spin.

I don't know how we would've compared over a longer road--this was pretty short--but it's still got to be a bummer to have paid probably $10k or $20k more to get the fancy supercharged 5.5L in your new Mercedes, and be shown up while out looking for fresh meat, before the plates even arrive in the mail.

Thought I'd share...
Old 01-22-2007, 03:53 PM
  #2  
Tony
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Tony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 14,676
Received 584 Likes on 305 Posts
Default

Old 01-22-2007, 03:55 PM
  #3  
Leslie 928 S2
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Leslie 928 S2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: On my blackberry
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Good job!! I feel bad for the other guy...but only sort of.
Old 01-22-2007, 03:58 PM
  #4  
bd0nalds0n
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
bd0nalds0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Diego, CA USA
Posts: 1,868
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Well, maybe I misspoke--the CLK55 doesn't have a supercharger, and looks like it puts down something like 380 hp. So it shouldn't have been much of a contest anyway.
Old 01-22-2007, 04:06 PM
  #5  
Tony
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Tony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 14,676
Received 584 Likes on 305 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bd0nalds0n
Well, maybe I misspoke--the CLK55 doesn't have a supercharger, and looks like it puts down something like 380 hp. So it shouldn't have been much of a contest anyway.

I thought the K designates "kompressor" thats what i was lead to believe?
Old 01-22-2007, 04:16 PM
  #6  
scott863
Pro
 
scott863's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tony
I thought the K designates "kompressor" thats what i was lead to believe?
K stands for Kurtz, which is short in German. CLK is the smaller CL. Just like the SLK is the smaller SL.

Porsche 917s racers in the golden era of LeMans came in 917 Langehecht and 917 Kurtz. The Lange Hecht was the "long tail" for races like Lemans back when it had the 4 mile long Mulsanne straight.
Old 01-22-2007, 05:36 PM
  #7  
fabric
Three Wheelin'
 
fabric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Evanston, IL, USA
Posts: 1,645
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by scott863
K stands for Kurtz, which is short in German. CLK is the smaller CL. Just like the SLK is the smaller SL.

Porsche 917s racers in the golden era of LeMans came in 917
Good info, I never new that was how it worked. Thanks!

Tony - they generally say "kompressor" somewhere on them if that is the case. On the non-AMGs, usually on the back on side, but the AMGs I think only have the designation on the side, if that.
Old 01-22-2007, 05:42 PM
  #8  
marton
Drifting
 
marton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: zürich, switzerland
Posts: 2,233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

HTML Code:
K stands for Kurtz, which is short in German. 
CLK is the smaller CL. Just like the SLK is the smaller SL.
Which CLK?
The CLK320 features a 3.2 L, 18-valve single overhead cam (SOHC) V6 engine and a 5-speed automatic transmission.
The CLK350 features a 3.5 L, 24-valve duel overhead cam (DOHC) V6 engine and a 7-speed automatic transmission.
The CLK500 features a 5.0 L, 24-valve SOHC V8 engine and a 7-speed automatic transmission.
The CLK550 features a 5.5L 32-valve V-8 engine and a 7-speed automatic transmission.
The CLK55 AMG features a 5.5 L, 24-valve SOHC V8 engine and a 5-speed automatic transmission.
The CLK63 AMG features a 6.3L V8 with a 7 speed automatic transmission. CLK63 has 31% more horse power and 23% more torque. The CLK63 is currently being used as the safety car in Formula One.

anyway

Marton
Old 01-22-2007, 08:39 PM
  #9  
bd0nalds0n
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
bd0nalds0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Diego, CA USA
Posts: 1,868
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I think all the CLKs share the same body ...the CLK is more diminutive than the CL. "Smaller" in this case refers to body size, not engine/transmission configuration.

And as I mentioned, in the title, it was a CLK55.

EDIT: I forgot to put in the K in CLK.

Last edited by bd0nalds0n; 01-22-2007 at 11:01 PM.
Old 01-22-2007, 09:08 PM
  #10  
123quattro
Drifting
 
123quattro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Farmington Hills, MI
Posts: 2,973
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by bd0nalds0n
To be fair, he was having traction problems as I edged away from him--I could hear his tires chirp chirp chirping as I assume his traction control kept retarding whatever it needed to eliminate the wheel spin.
Nice work. As an aside, traction control doesn't eliminate wheelspin. It controls slip. Different slip percentages are commanded on ice, snow, gravel, asphalt, et cetera.
Old 01-22-2007, 09:52 PM
  #11  
MBMB
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
MBMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,466
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bd0nalds0n
And as I mentioned, in the title, it was a CL55.
CL55 is a different kettle of fish entirely. 500+/- HP and 500+/- FtLb.
Old 01-22-2007, 10:02 PM
  #12  
Charley B
Rennlist Member
 
Charley B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Patterson, Ca
Posts: 4,373
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Actually in the title you said CLK 55.
Now go humble a CL55 and I will send you money.
Old 01-22-2007, 10:05 PM
  #13  
perrys4
The Lady's Man
Rennlist Member
 
perrys4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: south O.C. california
Posts: 10,444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I ran a CL500 a couple years ago from 70-125 and stayed a fender ahead of him when I expected to see nothing but tailights. I agree that a CL55 (63)? is a different breed. Thanks for the clarifictaion because i was getting confused.
Old 01-22-2007, 10:44 PM
  #14  
Jim Nowak
Drifting
 
Jim Nowak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The CL55 from 2000 to 2002 was NA and had around 350 hp but 2003 and later models have 493 hp and 516 lb-ft of tq available at 2750 rpm. The 2003 and later CL55 is good for 1/4 mile times in the 12's.

The CL600 was NA from 1993 to 2002. Starting in 2003 the CL600 was fitted with twin-turbos. Stock, the 2003 and later CL600 has 493 hp and 580 lb-ft of torque available at 1800 rpm. The CL600 will also run mid to low 12's stock. However, the CL600 has some incredibly untapped power and can be easily upgraded to 670 hp with an ECU mod and different air box. I gained over 126 RWHP with just the ECU tune from stock. My stage 1 Renntech CL600 put down over 524 RWHP. It's also capable of mid to low 11's in the 1/4 mile.
Old 01-23-2007, 05:32 AM
  #15  
littleball_s4
Racer
 
littleball_s4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Madrid, Spain
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 123quattro
Nice work. As an aside, traction control doesn't eliminate wheelspin. It controls slip. Different slip percentages are commanded on ice, snow, gravel, asphalt, et cetera.
Some do better than others. I tried myself the one from a CLK and its launches are crap. You start MUCH faster if you control the clutch carefully. If you pull it like if you were to doo a burnout, the car burns a bit of rubber, then the engine cuts drastically and almost stalls and takes ages to launch it again.


Quick Reply: Supermodel humbles CLK 55



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:25 AM.