Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Now, Emissions, was: Conundrum: Pressurized air in fuel rail. How?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-16-2006, 06:35 PM
  #31  
ZEUS+
Rennlist Member
 
ZEUS+'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Manchester,NH
Posts: 1,243
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

How is it now ?
Old 12-16-2006, 06:56 PM
  #32  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,432
Received 1,603 Likes on 1,047 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZEUS+
How is it now ?
It made the trip home just fine. Gas mileage may have improved.

There were no available slots yesterday for testing. The owner's going to retest next week.

I'll post additional data as it comes in.

I also told the owner to manipulate the outlet fuel hose to see if he could coax a fuel drip from it. However, I'm betting that he's betting on the re-connected fuel vapor system and the less-old MAF to get him through.
Old 12-16-2006, 07:02 PM
  #33  
ZEUS+
Rennlist Member
 
ZEUS+'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Manchester,NH
Posts: 1,243
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I hope he passes.
Old 12-18-2006, 10:12 AM
  #34  
928saregreat
Instructor
 
928saregreat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I hope he passes too, sorry I haven't been around guys, its a little crazy at work right now, I'm trying to get a number of things finished so I can leave for a week at christmas, hopefully... (sigh) I'd be interested to find out what the problem/problems actually turn out to be.

Bill said " I don't see what this has to do with failed NOx "

Well, in my mind, the way Worf described it thats alot of air. We're not talking at a particular injector malfunction..because its in the fuel rail itself and is under pressure that means its going to reduce the amount of fuel being introduced into the engine during any injector cycle across ALL EIGHT injectors at once. Thats gonna cause a lean condition that the LH is going to have to try and compensate for and I myself just can't see it being able to do that completely, which expains the high NOx. It would also explain why the car continues to run reasonably well and isn't trying to overheat, at least within the conditions that the car's being driven. Highway conditions are pretty easy on these cars, it might be different in a traffic jam. Lets just say that for the moment his cooling system is fairly robust and can handle the increased temps.

It is what it is. A crappy, clogged injector can cause high NOx but usually excessive HC are present as well. Because the hydrocarbons are low and the NOx is high that really suggests a lean condition to me for whatever reason and thats where I'd focus the diagnosis. Worf mentioned that many of the usual suspects such as O2, cats, MAF have been recently replaced. Well, I guess it doesn't hurt to double-check and make sure the said systems are working correctly, especially the O2.

Lets assume for the moment all of these items are working then where does it leave us? Don't forget about excessive carbon deposits, unlikely here but can cause high NOx, although that tends to have high HC's as well, same with a leaky cylinder again both would generally be present. The LH brain itself could be faulty, but as you guys were saying, the car runs relatively well with no other symptoms. Last but not least the pressurized air in the fuel rail. I still think thats a major contributor if not the main problem. Good luck with it guys.

Merry Christmas
Mark
Old 12-18-2006, 11:51 AM
  #35  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,432
Received 1,603 Likes on 1,047 Posts
Default

Bulletin: NOx went to 2100+ (700 limit) with less-old MAS and fuel vapor system connected. HC and C0 numbers are the essentially the same: 16 ppm and 0.01%

I'm going to send the owner instructions on how to read the O2 sensor.
Old 12-18-2006, 12:53 PM
  #36  
ZEUS+
Rennlist Member
 
ZEUS+'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Manchester,NH
Posts: 1,243
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Can you post all gas test results ?
Old 12-18-2006, 02:59 PM
  #37  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,432
Received 1,603 Likes on 1,047 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZEUS+
Can you post all gas test results ?
Code:
		HC	CO %	Nox	
Date		100 Lmt	0.32 Lmt 700 Limit	Comment
3/5/2005	13	0.02	514	Last Passing Numbers
11/4/2006	13	0.01	1301	First fail
11/13/2006	??	??	1200	After O2 Sensor R&R
12/11/2006	15	0.01	1971	After New Cats (928 SP X-over w/High Flow Cats)
12/18/2006	16	0.01	2139	After MAF Change and Fuel Vaper System Connection
Old 12-18-2006, 10:34 PM
  #38  
ZEUS+
Rennlist Member
 
ZEUS+'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Manchester,NH
Posts: 1,243
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

This is puzzling. It would be useful to have O2 results. To properly reduce NOx, the exhaust must be low in Os and the converter must have some CO to work with. Most converters can handle only about 2000 ppm NOx. This is why most manufacturers use an egr.
While it's difficult to have a NOx failure with a lot of CO present, high CO also causes carbon buildup in the combustion chamber and in the reduction portion of the converter. Even if you fix the CO problem, this carbon buildup remains. With CO low and the carbon buildup still there, you have the perfect conditions for NOx formation. Keep us posted on what finally resolves this problem.
Old 12-18-2006, 10:49 PM
  #39  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,432
Received 1,603 Likes on 1,047 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZEUS+
This is puzzling.
Ya think?
It would be useful to have O2 results.
Yup. Working on getting those remotely.
To properly reduce NOx, the exhaust must be low in Os and the converter must have some CO to work with. Most converters can handle only about 2000 ppm NOx.
Yup. NOx output rises dramatically with increasing a/f ratio. If the mixture is just a tad too lean the converter cannot clean out the NOx.
With CO low and the carbon buildup still there, you have the perfect conditions for NOx formation. Keep us posted on what finally resolves this problem.
The CO numbers are consistent at 0.01 or 0.02 for the passing 2005 test. So, unless the car ran high C0 in years previous to 2005 this doesn't seem highly likely.
If CO was high and/or HC was high we'd have some clues to work with.
Old 12-18-2006, 10:53 PM
  #40  
ZEUS+
Rennlist Member
 
ZEUS+'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Manchester,NH
Posts: 1,243
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

You must be pulling your hair out.
Old 12-19-2006, 02:21 AM
  #41  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Argh. MAF, O2 and cats and no better. What else can cause a very lean condition? You seem to have good fuel pressure. It's not clear whether the air/vapor in the rail was a red herring. I think someone already asked if you found the same thing on a cool engine, which would make that more interesting.

A gross intake air leak would be another possibility but it should cause idle issues. Still, looking for things like the breather line falling off the right side of the MAF boot, or a hole in that line, would be worth checking. I apologize if I missed that you already checked the breather and vacuum lines. For at least academic purposes it would be good to get a VOM on the O2 sensor.

Last edited by Bill Ball; 12-19-2006 at 05:07 PM.
Old 12-19-2006, 10:11 AM
  #42  
928saregreat
Instructor
 
928saregreat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Guys, are you using the same test facility each time? Could there be a problem with their equipment? It might be useful to get an independant check to be sure. Especially if the fuel economy is improving.

Mark
Old 12-19-2006, 02:05 PM
  #43  
danglerb
Nordschleife Master
 
danglerb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orange, Cal
Posts: 8,575
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

MAF, O2, Cats, kind of process of elimination leaving brain and injectors. (sensors and actuators too I guess)
Old 12-19-2006, 03:38 PM
  #44  
ZEUS+
Rennlist Member
 
ZEUS+'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Manchester,NH
Posts: 1,243
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

It is possible that the high flow cats are not getting hot enough to lower NOX. Some high flow cats are good from a performance aspect, yet not totally emission efficient.
Old 12-19-2006, 05:09 PM
  #45  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Yes, I'm not real thrilled with the aftermarket cats. I've seen other bad results with new ones versus the stock cats.


Quick Reply: Now, Emissions, was: Conundrum: Pressurized air in fuel rail. How?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:51 AM.