Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Eaton SG 1989 w/low fuel pressure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-13-2006, 10:12 AM
  #16  
S4-on-your-back-door
Pro
 
S4-on-your-back-door's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: spotsylvania VA
Posts: 546
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Tony, i have a question for you, im running 6psi, i have a v2 vortech supercharger stock exauste with the ex of rbm my idel fuel presure is 30lb and im running 30lb injectors in an 87s4 auto. my question is that my boost does not build like what your showing, if i floor it, it build gradaully and slowly.I have the lc-1 but its not working and i have to send it back so in the mean time i have a narrow band hooked up and it shows that im rich in wot but does not max out it the richment reading (maybe 3 more leds to go). is this the norm? and go i need to increase fuel presure Im also running a 12:1 fmu. thks
Old 11-13-2006, 11:36 AM
  #17  
BrianG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
BrianG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Edmonton, Ab
Posts: 2,286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by S4-on-your-back-door
Tony, i have a question for you, im running 6psi, i have a v2 vortech supercharger stock exauste with the ex of rbm my idel fuel presure is 30lb and im running 30lb injectors in an 87s4 auto. my question is that my boost does not build like what your showing, if i floor it, it build gradaully and slowly.I have the lc-1 but its not working and i have to send it back so in the mean time i have a narrow band hooked up and it shows that im rich in wot but does not max out it the richment reading (maybe 3 more leds to go). is this the norm? and go i need to increase fuel presure Im also running a 12:1 fmu. thks
Your boost build is normal for the type of pump. Tony's using a positive displacement type and yours is a centrifugal type (much like that used on turbo-chargers).

This difference in boost curve is why positive displacement superchargers are so much better than turbo's.
Old 11-13-2006, 11:43 AM
  #18  
Giovanni
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
Giovanni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Alabama
Posts: 4,269
Received 25 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Bill, the car would be jerking at low speed like a bull. Also at complete stops the RMP would drop from 750 rpm to 450 and back to 750 rpm. The car cranks on the first turn but would crank slow like its barely making it. Also low low low fuel pressure levels :-).
Old 11-13-2006, 11:48 AM
  #19  
BrianG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
BrianG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Edmonton, Ab
Posts: 2,286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Giovanni
Bill, the car would be jerking at low speed like a bull. Also at complete stops the RMP would drop from 750 rpm to 450 and back to 750 rpm. The car cranks on the first turn but would crank slow like its barely making it. Also low low low fuel pressure levels :-).
This is your CURRENT situation??
Old 11-13-2006, 11:53 AM
  #20  
Giovanni
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
Giovanni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Alabama
Posts: 4,269
Received 25 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Yes, current situation. Sorry if I confused everyone.
Old 11-13-2006, 12:52 PM
  #21  
bd0nalds0n
Three Wheelin'
 
bd0nalds0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Diego, CA USA
Posts: 1,868
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

The car should idle and run at normal speeds w/o boost perfectly normally. 30# of fuel pressure is more than enough to cruise. Slow cranking is another problem entirely.
Old 11-13-2006, 01:07 PM
  #22  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Is the cranking slow only once the car warms up? You may know where I'm going with this.
Old 11-13-2006, 01:45 PM
  #23  
Tony
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Tony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 14,676
Received 584 Likes on 305 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BrianG

This difference in boost curve is why positive displacement superchargers are so much better than turbo's.



Old 11-13-2006, 01:56 PM
  #24  
AO
Supercharged
Rennlist Member
 
AO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Back in Michigan - Full time!
Posts: 18,925
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Ball
Is the cranking slow only once the car warms up? You may know where I'm going with this.
I agree with, Bill. You might want to take a few minutes and examine the crank end-play. But being a 5-speed you should be good, but beeing a boostard, you never know.
Old 11-13-2006, 01:59 PM
  #25  
AO
Supercharged
Rennlist Member
 
AO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Back in Michigan - Full time!
Posts: 18,925
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BrianG
Your boost build is normal for the type of pump. Tony's using a positive displacement type and yours is a centrifugal type (much like that used on turbo-chargers).

This difference in boost curve is why positive displacement superchargers are so much better than turbo's.
This oughtta be good.
Old 11-13-2006, 02:19 PM
  #26  
bd0nalds0n
Three Wheelin'
 
bd0nalds0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Diego, CA USA
Posts: 1,868
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I thought TBF was exclusive to autos...?
Old 11-13-2006, 02:21 PM
  #27  
Giovanni
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
Giovanni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Alabama
Posts: 4,269
Received 25 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

But crank end play has no play when it comes to low fuel pressure?
Old 11-13-2006, 02:31 PM
  #28  
AO
Supercharged
Rennlist Member
 
AO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Back in Michigan - Full time!
Posts: 18,925
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bd0nalds0n
I thought TBF was exclusive to autos...?
Certainly more prevalent, but I don't think it's exclusive. They symptoms Gio's describing are in-line with it. I'd rather take 30min to find out and have peace of mind that to take a chance to FUBAR my engine.
Old 11-13-2006, 03:51 PM
  #29  
bd0nalds0n
Three Wheelin'
 
bd0nalds0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Diego, CA USA
Posts: 1,868
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

If it's bucking and humping and won't crank, and it's due to the crank walking, FUBAR is past, not future tense.

Personally, and this is just opinion with no stats to back it up, I think TBF is exclusive to the autos, but I would be interested in hearing if there are any examples of TBF in a 5-sp. I am under the impression that it has something to do with the later model automatic torque tubes, because the earlier model autos don't have the same problem.
Old 11-13-2006, 04:27 PM
  #30  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Actually I misred Gio's sig in my haste. His car being a 5-speed makes TBF far less likely, but it is possible, having to do with clutch pressure on the flywheel and crank rather than a maladjusted TT clamp.

We need a precise description of the symptoms and under what conditions they occur. The slow engine cranking when hot can be other things than TBF (e.g., could be the starter). It would be worthwhile to see if the force required to turn the crank is higher than when cold.

When does the bucking occur? Just hot? All RPMs? Any other symptroms that may provide more clues?


Quick Reply: Eaton SG 1989 w/low fuel pressure



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:57 AM.