Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

GT Sport Suspension? Don't Count On It.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-18-2006, 12:54 PM
  #16  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

In that table above....what do the front axle and rear axle columns indicate...same for single pipe and double pipe? I assume X=standard, O=optional. But that makes little sense. None of the rear axle cells have a X in them. This table needs to be completely reformatted.
Old 09-18-2006, 05:57 AM
  #17  
marton
Drifting
 
marton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: zürich, switzerland
Posts: 2,233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

HTML Code:
Question is, are there any '89 GTs which do not have M474 option 
along with M639. Hands up
I would be interested to know the answer & if the M474 option is listed.
I believe there were some specification differences between the M639 option on the 89s & the specification for the GT models that appeared in 90 & later but it is hard to find any evidence. I mean some of the CS mods like less sound deadening under the carpets, along the transmission tunnel, along the rear quarter pannels and the boot maybe also the lighter ancilliaries?

Marton



Quick Reply: GT Sport Suspension? Don't Count On It.



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:59 PM.