WSM Confusion - Lower control arm bolt torque
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 17,322
Likes: 2,183
From: Gone. On the Open Road
Bill is making a point about the front bushing, mounting, and chassis interface. I simply do not understand specifically to what he refers because some part of the LCA must rotate at both chassis attachment points.
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,648
Likes: 52
From: Buckeye, AZ
Dave: That's the way it is, as Jon confirms. The front bush is elastic enough to allow the necessary A-arm movement. Also, properly torqued and properly not greased, the rear bush is all but stuck as well, otherwise it would probably wear out in no time. I think I originally heard about the front bush bonding from Marc Thomas. My front bushes are still solidly bonded and cannot be turned to a new position but spring back to the original position. I have seen one "broken" one where the front mount could be moved and would not spring back.
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 17,322
Likes: 2,183
From: Gone. On the Open Road
And if you can rotate the front easily by hand then that's probably not good either. But, when driving, for there to be any suspension movement at all, both the upper and lower control arms must rotate. Otherwise the wheel hub cannot move up and down relative to the chassis. The amount the control arms must rotate is, obviously, very limited - and indeed calculable. It's probably on the order of 15° or so, but non-zero nonetheless.
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,648
Likes: 52
From: Buckeye, AZ
I think I understand the A-arm must move. It does. But that bush is bonded but flexible AFAIK. Sorry, I edited my post as you were replying. Marc Thomas could have been wrong, but my experience with the front lower A-arms seems to go along with what he told me years ago. That said, this thread corrected one of my early misreadings about the torqueing of the A-arms, and maybe it needs to correct this other notion as well.
It does. But that bush is bonded but flexible AFAIK. Sorry, I edited my post as you were replying. Marc Thomas could have been wrong, but my experience with the front lower A-arms seems to go along with what he told me years ago. That said, this thread corrected one of my early misreadings about the torqueing of the A-arms, and maybe it needs to correct this other notion as well.
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 17,322
Likes: 2,183
From: Gone. On the Open Road
I think I understand the A-arm must move. It does. But that bush is bonded but flexible AFAIK. Sorry, I edited my post as you were replying. Marc Thomas could have been wrong, but my experience with the front lower A-arms seems to go along with what he told me years ago.
It does. But that bush is bonded but flexible AFAIK. Sorry, I edited my post as you were replying. Marc Thomas could have been wrong, but my experience with the front lower A-arms seems to go along with what he told me years ago.Hmmm... so, it follows then, that torquing the rear LCA bolts before the suspension has settled will not only make the car harder to settle for alignment, but may also lead to accelerated wear of the LCA bushings.
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,648
Likes: 52
From: Buckeye, AZ
Dave: I think your last post is right. This may be one reason why Porsche says no "renewing" of the front LCAs in the WSM. I notice Carl now offers such. I wonder what he would have to say about the front bushing.
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 17,322
Likes: 2,183
From: Gone. On the Open Road
Team Owner
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 31,301
Likes: 4,271
From: Philly PA
just a warning if you have already bolted the LCA to the car while it was on the jack stands then gotten the front end aligned then you should not loosen the LCA bolts to retorque them as the front end will then go out of alignment.
Rennlist Stories
The Best Porsche Posts for Porsche Enthusiasts
Genius Porsche-Themed Gifts That'll Make Any Dad or Grad Smile
Joe Kucinski
10 Used Porsches Are Selling for Way Too Cheap
Joe Kucinski
Tuner Is Converting Porsche 911s Into Shooting Brakes
Verdad Gallardo
This Coachbuilt Creation Is A Modern Take on the Legendary Porsche 917
Verdad Gallardo
Is This Convertible Cayenne A Steal, Or A Returnless Investment?
Verdad Gallardo
10 Best Non-Flat Six Porsches You Can Buy For Under $100K
Joe Kucinski
Porsche's Top 5 Most Questionable Naming Decisions
Verdad Gallardo
Pogea Racing's 964 Porsche 911 Reimagination Stands Out in a Crowded Field
Verdad Gallardo
6 Convertible Top MYTHS Most People Don't Understand!
Michael S. Palmer
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,608
Likes: 12
From: Sydney AUS
IIRC doesn't one of the brackets have a locating lug on it - maybe it's the rear saddle to it's receiver ?
Thread Starter
Administrator
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 3,104
From: Up Nort
Rennlist Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,066
Likes: 436
From: Cleveland, MN
After further study, you should notice that the front bushing has a “full circumference” metal housing and cannot be deformed by full torque on the bolts.
Where as, the rear bushing has a two piece “clamping mount” and can be “locked” in any position. Settling the suspension with the bolts loose would let it “find home”. At that point, proper torque on the bolts will hold it in position to flex as designed.
Does this make sense or am I way off base here?
Where as, the rear bushing has a two piece “clamping mount” and can be “locked” in any position. Settling the suspension with the bolts loose would let it “find home”. At that point, proper torque on the bolts will hold it in position to flex as designed.
Does this make sense or am I way off base here?
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,608
Likes: 12
From: Sydney AUS
After further study, you should notice that the front bushing has a “full circumference” metal housing and cannot be deformed by full torque on the bolts.
Where as, the rear bushing has a two piece “clamping mount” and can be “locked” in any position. Settling the suspension with the bolts loose would let it “find home”. At that point, proper torque on the bolts will hold it in position to flex as designed.
Does this make sense or am I way off base here?
Where as, the rear bushing has a two piece “clamping mount” and can be “locked” in any position. Settling the suspension with the bolts loose would let it “find home”. At that point, proper torque on the bolts will hold it in position to flex as designed.
Does this make sense or am I way off base here?
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 14,697
Likes: 598
From: Las Vegas
After further study, you should notice that the front bushing has a “full circumference” metal housing and cannot be deformed by full torque on the bolts.
Where as, the rear bushing has a two piece “clamping mount” and can be “locked” in any position. Settling the suspension with the bolts loose would let it “find home”. At that point, proper torque on the bolts will hold it in position to flex as designed.
Does this make sense or am I way off base here?
Where as, the rear bushing has a two piece “clamping mount” and can be “locked” in any position. Settling the suspension with the bolts loose would let it “find home”. At that point, proper torque on the bolts will hold it in position to flex as designed.
Does this make sense or am I way off base here?
Bit of a thread resurrection ...
Reading a few posts from searches on Lower control arms...... this is good stuff.
as I look at my new controls arms, my old ones were really...reeeeeeeally bad.
leaving the rear bolts “loose” does make sense and his quote about it above explains it well.
where would we be with the info “stored” on here....??
Nordschleife Master
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,956
Likes: 331
From: Kaukauna Wisconsin
