Murf928 G-Tech run 11.49sec @ 132.59 mph 3.79sec 0-60
#121
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You made it sound like that you only ran a 2.60's 60 foot because of your slow reaction time.
Why even include it?
Why even include it?
Hi ![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
The point was about my 60 foot time...not my reaction time and yes it works the same way here...I COULD have sat on the line staged for 10 seconds if I wished....
I was making the point about traction and diff ratios and tyre/wheel sizes....
As a matter of interest I also have a G-Tech Race which I gave up using as it was too inaccurate.... so when someone said in this thread ahh but generally G-techs underread , I laughed as that was not what someone said here when I ran a 2.9 0 to 60 mph on a G-Tech...
They said precisely the opposite....
All the best Brett![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
The point was about my 60 foot time...not my reaction time and yes it works the same way here...I COULD have sat on the line staged for 10 seconds if I wished....
I was making the point about traction and diff ratios and tyre/wheel sizes....
As a matter of interest I also have a G-Tech Race which I gave up using as it was too inaccurate.... so when someone said in this thread ahh but generally G-techs underread , I laughed as that was not what someone said here when I ran a 2.9 0 to 60 mph on a G-Tech...
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
All the best Brett
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)