Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

S4 or GT Springs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-02-2006, 06:01 AM
  #1  
khalloudy
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
khalloudy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Riyadh, KSA
Posts: 1,306
Received 147 Likes on 87 Posts
Default S4 or GT Springs

Ok Banzaiis,

I will be doing some work on the car, and since it will be in the air, i was thinking i should get new front springs as mine are sagging (i could max raise my car to 160mm front!!! blows). I want the car to ride at 170mm all around before i take it to alignment. I already have Boge Red shocks all around making my car similarly spec'd to the M474 option code which was the Sports Suspension through 89. Now i am considering the S4 springs or the GT spring (M637 option at this point). I am looking for feedback about the ride stiffness of the stock GT Spring/Shock combo. The magazines always refered to it as a jaw jarring ride, and it has been 15 years since i last rode a new 928GT, so i do not recall well. Any feedback will be greatly appreciated before i drop the loot

Sincerely,
Old 06-02-2006, 06:51 AM
  #2  
Ed Hughes
Rennlist Member
 
Ed Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 16,517
Received 79 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

I don't know, the whole stiffness thing is totally subjective. The reviewers are the same guys that test Buicks. Some of the luxo-suspensions make me nauseous with the floating sensation. I have put a lot of goodies in my 911 that should make it a stiff ride, but I don't see what the fuss is all about, it feels connected IMO. My guess is anything you talk about here, short of race setup, would be fine. IMO.
Old 06-02-2006, 09:37 AM
  #3  
John Veninger
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
John Veninger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,925
Received 36 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

I like the GT Sport suspension for the street. For me, it's a nice compromise between to hard and to soft.

Now the front 900lbs hypercoil on solid mounted bilsteins in the track car is a bit stiff

Last edited by John Veninger; 06-02-2006 at 09:56 AM.
Old 06-02-2006, 09:52 AM
  #4  
jakermc
Rennlist Member
 
jakermc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 2,019
Received 549 Likes on 243 Posts
Default

I'm with Ed, I've never been in a car that I felt had too stiff a suspension. I just put low profile 18" tires on my GT last night and it improved the ride immensely for me.

I wonder if the jaw jarring descriptions from the initial reviews when the GT was introduced need to be put into the context of when they were written. What seemed overly stiff 15 years ago seems to be more common today. With the performance levels reached by so many cars today, it seems spring rates have increased to deal with it. Low profile tires are also common today, making things harsher than in the past but comsumers are eating it up. Maybe Porsche was ahead of its time and we've all gotten used to it?

The reviews also described the 225 / 245 x 16 tires "massive".
Old 06-02-2006, 10:26 AM
  #5  
SMTCapeCod
Race Car
 
SMTCapeCod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Mechanochondriacism
Posts: 4,700
Received 22 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Neither- go club sport--- 928 Specialists list them as 928.343.511.12.504...
Old 06-02-2006, 01:00 PM
  #6  
IcemanG17
Race Director
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,270
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

How about some eibachs?
Old 06-02-2006, 01:11 PM
  #7  
SMTCapeCod
Race Car
 
SMTCapeCod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Mechanochondriacism
Posts: 4,700
Received 22 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

How would Eibachs help him gain/restore ride height?
Old 06-02-2006, 01:25 PM
  #8  
khalloudy
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
khalloudy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Riyadh, KSA
Posts: 1,306
Received 147 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

The 928GT had the same springs as the 928CS. I personally like stiff suspension without it hammering down the tarmac. The new 300ZX had a pretty stiff ride and eventually it got annoying - like it how the 928 can be agressive yet comfortable.
Old 06-02-2006, 03:10 PM
  #9  
C.F.
Instructor
 
C.F.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Across the BIG pond.The UK.
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by khalloudy
....... I already have Boge Red shocks all around making my car similarly spec'd to the M474 option code which was the Sports Suspension through 89. Now i am considering the S4 springs or the GT spring (M637 option at this point). ...............Sincerely,
According to the PET
M474 is the sports suspension which comes standard with M639 which is the GT option
M637 is the CS/SE '88/'89 option & NOT part of the GT option
As far as I can see the S4 & GT both use the same springs front & rear, its only the shocks/dampers that are different.
So the choice would be between stock S4/GT or CS M637 springs, Front only , rear are all the same
Old 06-03-2006, 02:26 AM
  #10  
928Quest
Racer
 
928Quest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Gilbert, AZ. U.S.A.
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Khaled,

You were asking today at the shop if I prefferred the S4 or GT suspesion on my 91's. I mentioned that the GT seemed to be as smooth or smoother that the S4. Later, after you left and Dan put the GT up on the lift I found out why. Apparently my GT has S4 shocks from the factory, they still have all of the original cosmolene so it's not a retrofit.

Chuck
Old 06-03-2006, 03:07 AM
  #11  
redpathtribe
Rennlist Member
 
redpathtribe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Didn't think the sport suspension refers mainly to springs...

My 90 GT has original suspension with Boge shocks (not sports?) and I thought GT specific springs. I thought the difference was in the shocks available and that the GT came with stiffer springs than the S4...

This seems to go along with what Chuck just saw on his 91 GT.

Khaled, since my suspension is original, and I am going to be replacing it soon with either Koni/Eibachs or Koni/Hypercoils, I'll sell you my "GT" springs... only slightly used...

Rick Redpath
90 GT, Guards Red, Black/Grey
Old 06-03-2006, 03:08 AM
  #12  
pmotts
Burning Brakes
 
pmotts's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Of the 4 GT's I have owned 2 had S4 shocks from the factory. I guess people were worried about the ride being too stiff. None of the rides were harsh in any way.

Chuck, I want your GT.

Originally Posted by 928Quest
Khaled,

You were asking today at the shop if I prefferred the S4 or GT suspesion on my 91's. I mentioned that the GT seemed to be as smooth or smoother that the S4. Later, after you left and Dan put the GT up on the lift I found out why. Apparently my GT has S4 shocks from the factory, they still have all of the original cosmolene so it's not a retrofit.

Chuck
Old 06-03-2006, 03:51 AM
  #13  
khalloudy
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
khalloudy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Riyadh, KSA
Posts: 1,306
Received 147 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

This is pretty interesting, from reviewing the specs, it looks like the S4s had the optional sport suspension (M474) which used the Boge Red shocks with the regular springs (this is my current setup and the car's ride is very comfy). My issue is a little bit of a bounce when the road goes up and down. I do not like that at all. Looking at the GT setup, it had option M474 for the shocks only. The euro cars which carried from the CS (which was the original GT in disguise minus the leather) had M637 and those were the stiffer front springs.
It is interesting that Chuck's car came stock with the Boge blues! that is very interesting (oh by the way, it is a beautiful car inside and out - congrats Chuck, you got a nice one there).
So I guess this takes me back to thinking if i should get the 637 or regular springs? umm confused now really really confused.
Rick, I would buy your springs, but you have 140k on your car, so i bet yours are just as good as mine at this point, so i want to get new ones that would keep the car at the correct ride height for another 20 years but thanks for the offer

Sincerely,
Old 06-03-2006, 09:58 AM
  #14  
JPTL
Rennlist Member
 
JPTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Warrenton, VA
Posts: 2,663
Received 215 Likes on 95 Posts
Default

I changed my stock GT shocks/springs to Bilstein/Eibachs because I felt that the ride was a bit too soft. Standing next to the car, I was able to push the front or rear down a few inches without much effort.
I haven't heard anybody complainining about the GT stock suspension being too soft, so maybe I had some tired shocks.
Anyway, the Eibach/Bilstein combo. makes for a very firm ride (some might say stiff). I'm guessing that it's both the shocks & springs that provide the ride characteristics.
If you get annoyed by a firm ride that borders on stiff, I wouldn't opt for the Eibachs. I would also make sure that Bilsteins or Konis won't stiffen your ride before I installed those.
Old 06-03-2006, 10:20 AM
  #15  
Chris
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 1,197
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I think you are wrong about the 474 option using regular springs, the front ones are different i.e. stiffer. Workshop manuals have the specs.

Chris


Quick Reply: S4 or GT Springs



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:11 AM.