Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

In tank fuel pump

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-09-2007, 10:11 PM
  #31  
IcemanG17
Race Director
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,271
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Its weird how some 928's have the problematic internal pump...then others don't....it varies by MY...& sometimes inbetween model years! I was lucky I DIDN't have one when my external failed! 1 less thing to check...since the tank was full!
Old 05-02-2008, 06:51 PM
  #32  
Earl Gillstrom
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Earl Gillstrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Glen Mills, PA
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

In 2002 when I got my '91 GT running, I found the intank pump hose broken. I replaced it with a Porsche original hose. 2 years later I checked the hose and it was split like the original. I replaced it with SAE 30R7 hose. Now, 3 years later with no symptoms of problems I checked it again and the 30R7 hose was fine. I replaced it anyway with USCG type A1 SAE J1527/ISO 7840 1/2" hose. Both of these hoses have braid. The Porsche hose had no braid. The A1 hose is much heavier than the 30R7 hose. I would suggest either of these hoses over the OEM Porsche hose. I would have used 30R10 hose if it was available in 1/2" ID. It appears that somewhere around 1990 or 1991 that Porsche started using this inferior hose.
The initial symptoms that I had with the split hoses was missing above 3000 RPM.
Old 05-02-2008, 08:46 PM
  #33  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,560
Received 1,682 Likes on 1,092 Posts
Default

Great info. Thanks Earl!
Old 04-27-2011, 10:55 PM
  #34  
kingsmen11
Advanced
 
kingsmen11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: On the road 2-86.5, 3-87S4, 1-89S4 5sp
Posts: 76
Received 6 Likes on 1 Post
Default

I have found this fuel line 20% fluoroelastomer hose Grade A, 1/2" ID, 0.84" OD, 4.32mm wall, Max 248 degree F, 300 PSI from Dudadiesel.com. Minimum one foot lengths, $4.49. I will get back with the results, when the hose is applied.
Old 04-28-2011, 06:28 AM
  #35  
Hilton
Nordschleife Master
 
Hilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ɹəpun uʍop 'ʎəupʎs
Posts: 6,285
Received 55 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Intersting Gerry - shame they don't have the viton-only hoses in the larger sizes, just the 20% stuff. It will likely hold up better than regular fuel hose.

I was wondering whether using 1/2" teflon braided hose might do the trick - or rather, stripping off the braid and using just the teflon hose inside to replace the factory one.

I might have to see if I can track some down for the next time I'm taking the fuel tank out of my 89 (its been a few years since I repaired my in-tank pump - would be good to check and make sure the fuel hose I used is still intact).
Old 04-28-2011, 01:08 PM
  #36  
ALKada
Race Car
 
ALKada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,015
Received 157 Likes on 93 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kingsmen11
I have found this fuel line 20% fluoroelastomer hose Grade A, 1/2" ID, 0.84" OD, 4.32mm wall, Max 248 degree F, 300 PSI from Dudadiesel.com. Minimum one foot lengths, $4.49. I will get back with the results, when the hose is applied.
Gerry, was that the cause of your pump failure on our trip to Rockport? Is it running fine now?
Old 04-28-2011, 01:21 PM
  #37  
kingsmen11
Advanced
 
kingsmen11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: On the road 2-86.5, 3-87S4, 1-89S4 5sp
Posts: 76
Received 6 Likes on 1 Post
Default

The Rockport trip failure is still unknown, as I haven't gotten around to removing the external pump, or dropping the tank. The car is running fine, just waiting on this new line. I've been driving around on almost no fuel in the tank, fixing to drop the tank. After some conversation I was told about the 30R7, or 30R9 hose yesterday, I jumped on the web. I looked up this thread, and then did further checks, and came up with this hose, which seems from the chart discussed on the seller site, to be able to handle the task. MTF
Old 04-28-2011, 01:35 PM
  #38  
kingsmen11
Advanced
 
kingsmen11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: On the road 2-86.5, 3-87S4, 1-89S4 5sp
Posts: 76
Received 6 Likes on 1 Post
Default

I just checked the Gates SAE30R10, which is for submersible applications. It is available only in 5/16, and 3/8 ID sizes. The only difference I have seen discussed in either write up is the Gates hose has the aramid compound found in bullet proof vests. It is not discussed in the Duda Diesel site. MTF
Old 04-28-2011, 01:38 PM
  #39  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,152
Received 87 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

If its 20% flouro - what is the other 80%?
Old 04-28-2011, 07:45 PM
  #40  
Hilton
Nordschleife Master
 
Hilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ɹəpun uʍop 'ʎəupʎs
Posts: 6,285
Received 55 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kingsmen11
I just checked the Gates SAE30R10, which is for submersible applications. It is available only in 5/16, and 3/8 ID sizes. The only difference I have seen discussed in either write up is the Gates hose has the aramid compound found in bullet proof vests. It is not discussed in the Duda Diesel site. MTF
Yep, SAE 30R10 is the specification for submersible fuel hoses, and the only supplier I could readily find of it is Gates which as you note only comes in 5/16 and 3/8.

The 20% viton one should have some resistance (the other 80% is nitrile I believe?).

My understanding is that Teflon (PTFE) hose shouldn't break down at all in fuel?
Old 09-01-2011, 03:06 PM
  #41  
Nicholbry
Rennlist Member
 
Nicholbry's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

"....5/16 and 3/8"

Are either of these sizes compatible with our application or are they out of range to fit?
Old 09-01-2011, 03:13 PM
  #42  
Ninespub
Three Wheelin'
 
Ninespub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Saginaw, MI
Posts: 1,384
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I just replaced my broken internal pump (again) with the filter solution and also had to replace the main pump, hose and hard line too. Don't play with fate, just get rid of the F***ING internal pump. You'll feel better.
Old 09-01-2011, 06:04 PM
  #43  
123
Racer
 
123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ninespub
I just replaced my broken internal pump (again) with the filter solution and also had to replace the main pump, hose and hard line too. Don't play with fate, just get rid of the F***ING internal pump. You'll feel better.
Not sure what you mean by "the filter solution". Did you mean using one of the stock internal strainers that were used on some cars?
Old 09-01-2011, 08:00 PM
  #44  
jpitman2
Rennlist Member
 
jpitman2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,283
Received 49 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

My car did 10 years in 120F environments with no in-tank pump....In hot, high, and high load usage, maybe its necessary, but for most of us I think the in-tank is an unnecessary extra point of failure.
jp 83 Euro S AT 53k
Old 09-01-2011, 11:57 PM
  #45  
nc_growler
Burning Brakes
 
nc_growler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 765
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 123
Not sure what you mean by "the filter solution". Did you mean using one of the stock internal strainers that were used on some cars?
Just finished doing exactly this on my GT. Pulled the in-tank pump (broken hose), didn't bother to check to see if worked or not, and replaced it with the in-tank strainer, replaced the external pump, and the fuel filter. Then replaced all the rubber fuel lines.

It's been running great since.


Quick Reply: In tank fuel pump



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:21 PM.