Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

18"X9" Wheels All Around?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-07-2005, 05:20 PM
  #16  
atb
Rennlist Member
 
atb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 4,869
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

FBIII wrote:

For the life of me I have never understood what is the "conventional" wheel and tire fitment on the 928. Given our front engine layout and damn near perfect 50/50 balance, you would think tire and wheel sizes would be fairly close when comparing the fronts to back. But what is being run is more like what is run on the rear engined and biased 911's. This has never made much sense to me.
Wide track for a wide motor means narrower tires upfront when maintaining the overall shape of the car. I seem to recall hearing also that the narrow front tires had to do with reducing drag at speed. Don't know how much truth there is in that though.
Old 12-07-2005, 06:40 PM
  #17  
Rufus Sanders
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Rufus Sanders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Minneapolis MN
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dave R.

Thanks for clearing this up. I was really hoping it was possible to have those Modas all around. What if you went with a 245 or 235 tire up front? But hey the idea of widening an existing wheel is great too. Maybe that's the way to go.

Also, Glen, is that your son's 944 in your avitaar photo? Where are those Boxster wheels I saw on it (or was I seeing things???) - Ruf
Old 12-07-2005, 06:50 PM
  #18  
DR
Rennlist Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
DR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 4,306
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Ruf,

>Dave R. Thanks for clearing this up. I was really hoping it was possible to have those Modas all >around.

No problem.

>What if you went with a 245

245/45-16 is doable, 245 17 or 18 is not made in the proper diameter(25") to my knowledge.

>or 235 tire up front?

Same deal as above (wrong diameter tire IMHO), and since it is taller it would only amplify rubbing issues from incorrect offset wheels on the front.
__________________
David Roberts
2010 Jaguar XKR Coupe - 510HP Stock - Liquid Silver Metallic
928 Owners Club Co-Founder
Rennlist 928 Forum Main Sponsor
www.928gt.com

928 Specialists on Facebook - 928Specialists
Sharks in the Mountains on Facebook - 928SITM

Old 12-07-2005, 07:03 PM
  #19  
DR
Rennlist Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
DR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 4,306
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

> At least they seem OK.....

So did my second wife..... at first :-)
Old 12-07-2005, 07:12 PM
  #20  
GlenL
Nordschleife Master
 
GlenL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 7,651
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rufus Sanders
Also, Glen, is that your son's 944 in your avitaar photo? Where are those Boxster wheels I saw on it (or was I seeing things???) - Ruf
Hey, Ruf.

Seein' things. In the Summer it gets S4 wheels that I got from Rick via eBay. Those in the pic are the "winter wheels" (old S wheels) with snow tires.
Old 12-07-2005, 09:14 PM
  #21  
928ntslow
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
928ntslow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 4,172
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Hmmm....911/912's originally had the same sized tires all around. As the engines got larger, it made a somehat bad situation worse. To counter act the increased rear weight issue, Porsche added wider wheels and tires in the back for increased contact patch to keep the car on the road around curves. It worked....kinda.

Having narrower tires in the front of a 928 seems unneccessary if you ask me. 928's had the same sized tires all around until the late 80's. I think they put larger tires in the rear for a sportier look and quite possible for increased hp in putting the power to the ground. Keeping narrower tires up front allowed for , not so bad gas mileage and relatively easier steering for the common driver.

It just makes sense to me that a 50/50 car should have the same sized wheels and tires all the way around. I think the wider tires in the back end up pushing the car so much, it makes it tougher for the fronts to actually steer to the optimum. Uuuuuuuunnnnnnnfortunately, most all wheels out there for the 928 are designed with the 911 in mind. I wish I could have put the same sized wheels and tires all around my GTS...it would have been too costly for me to do.

The 82 will though...and they WILL be 9.5" all around!
Old 12-07-2005, 09:35 PM
  #22  
MrLexse
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
MrLexse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 499
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Someone had mentioned to me that putting spacers in, lessens the offset. I'm confused. Is that the case and if so why?
Old 12-08-2005, 12:21 AM
  #23  
heinrich
928 Collector
Rennlist Member

 
heinrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 17,269
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Lex, offset is the distance between the wheel's imaginary centre line and the mounting surface. Positive offset is when the mounting flat surface with bolt holes, is toward the outside of the wheel. Adding a spacer pushes the whole wheel outward, and thus the centre line of the wheel has been pushed outward, or put differently the spacer has become a new mount surface, which sits closer to the centre line of the wheel. Remember the spacer mounts to the wheel hub face. So if offset was originally 50mm and you add a 10mm spacer, the gap between centre line and mounting face now is smaller, and effective offset is now 40mm.
Old 12-08-2005, 02:58 AM
  #24  
928ntslow
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
928ntslow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 4,172
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Question
Someone had mentioned to me that putting spacers in, lessens the offset. I'm confused. Is that the case and if so why?
Answer
So if offset was originally 50mm and you add a 10mm spacer, the gap between centre line and mounting face now is smaller, and effective offset is now 40mm.
Heinrich is correct, BUT...the offset is actually increased over all. It is a tricky question to answer really. Let's say you need a 65mm offset overall. Say you have a wheel that has a 40mm offset as Heiny says. To mount it to a 928 without a spacer, would put the inner lip of the rim in too close or right against the chassis/body/shocks. You will then need a 25mm spacer to push the wheel further away from the chassis/body/shocks to get it positioned where you need it out in the wheel well. In essence, you have increased the necessary offset to allow the wheel to fit.

HOWEVER, when looking at this from the angle of the person who told you this info, the spacer lessens the offset, based on the fitment of a particular wheel with a given offset less than the necessary 65mm....as in the wheel with a 40mm offset.

If you can't follow that, try this. You need an offset of 65mm. You have a wheel that is 40mm. Adding a 25mm spacer will lessen the needed offset to allow the 40mm offset wheel to fit properly.

HTH
Old 12-08-2005, 07:29 AM
  #25  
John Veninger
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
John Veninger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,925
Received 36 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

This may help:
http://www.1010tire.com/WheelOffsetCalculator.asp

Currently I run 9.5X17 on the front of the track car with 275 Hoosiers and rolled fender. The have a 73mm offset. They make no contact except when at full lock parking the car.
Old 12-08-2005, 09:04 AM
  #26  
MBMB
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
MBMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,466
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Would you say a spacer increases the offset of the wheel (from that point of view) or decreases the offset needed by the car (from that POV)?

Originally Posted by 928ntslow
HOWEVER, when looking at this from the angle of the person who told you this info, the spacer lessens the offset, based on the fitment of a particular wheel with a given offset less than the necessary 65mm....as in the wheel with a 40mm offset.

If you can't follow that, try this. You need an offset of 65mm. You have a wheel that is 40mm. Adding a 25mm spacer will lessen the needed offset to allow the 40mm offset wheel to fit properly.
Old 12-08-2005, 09:32 AM
  #27  
John Veninger
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
John Veninger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,925
Received 36 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Would you say a spacer increases the offset of the wheel (from that point of view) or decreases the offset needed by the car (from that POV)?
You CANNOT "space" a 52mm offset wheel to a 65mm offset.
Old 12-08-2005, 09:50 AM
  #28  
MBMB
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
MBMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,466
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Then I'm confused, because Keith says you can "space" a 40mm offset wheel to a 65mm offset. Why 40 but not 52?

Originally Posted by John Veninger
You CANNOT "space" a 52mm offset wheel to a 65mm offset.
Old 12-08-2005, 09:56 AM
  #29  
Peter F
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Peter F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sweden, Stockholm
Posts: 1,242
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

A spacer decreases the offset, thats why.
Higher offset number moves the wheel closer to inside of wheel well.
Lower offset puts the wheel further out, that is also why adding spacers lowers the offset the same number of mm as the spacer is thick.

Cheers/Peter
Old 12-08-2005, 10:10 AM
  #30  
DR
Rennlist Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
DR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 4,306
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

>Then I'm confused, because Keith says you can "space" a 40mm offset wheel to a 65mm offset.

Keep in mind that our good friend Keith lives in California and I think the officials were burning some "bushes" nearby when he wrote that :-)

The confusion that causes such mistakes is that we do not generally refer to the offsets on our 928s correctly, we have NEGATIVE offsets, not positive offsets. You can't add "positive" (spacers) to a "negative" offset and increase the "negative offset"... what you do is decrease the "negative offset".

Add 20 mm spacers (positive) to a 65 negative offset and you get a 45mm negative offset ..

If you are talking positive offset then yes adding a 20 mm spacer to a 45 mm positive offset will give you a 65mm positive offset.

Here is hopefully a simple way to describe "offsets".

Imagine a line directly down the middle of the width of your wheels. Then measure the distance to the hub/rotor mounting surface (where the studs stick out), the distance to this surface from this "center line" is the "offset".

If the hub/rotor mounting surface is towards the outside of the center line (towards fender lip) then the offset is negative. If the same surface is towards the inside of the center line (body chassis), then it would be positive offset. Our 928s have and use negative offsets.


Quick Reply: 18"X9" Wheels All Around?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:06 AM.