Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Rear Mount Turbo Progress??????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-29-2005, 10:04 AM
  #151  
atb
Rennlist Member
 
atb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 4,869
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

https://rennlist.com/forums/showthre...ar+mount+turbo
Old 12-29-2005, 02:58 PM
  #152  
Old & New
Rennlist Member
 
Old & New's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Southern New England
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dave,

Do not try to teach a pig to sing. You are wasting your time and it annoys the pig.
Old 12-29-2005, 04:38 PM
  #153  
Herr-Kuhn
Banned
 
Herr-Kuhn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

O/N, where have you been good buddy? The BS gets thicker and thicker on this thread as time goes on.

Dave, for your amusement I did go and get the Battle of the Boost article from the August issue of Hotrod Magazine. This compares the power output of a CS, Turbo and Roots style blower. For what we 928 owners use, the roots portion of this doesn't count because the TS units used on the 928 kits are far superior to the roots unit tested in this article. Additionally, the roots unit used ran lower boost pressure then the CS and turbo, so the comparison is not equal there.

So, this brings us to the CS vs turbo. Both systems were non-intercooled. Both systems ran 9.5 psig maximum boost pressure. CS was a Paxton Novi 1200 (a known high performing unit), the turbo is most likely a Garrett, though it does not say. The engine is a mildly worked over 5.0 liter Ford...the same engine loaded on the same load dyno under the same conditions.

Here are the results for you to think about:

Peak torque CS: 561 ft-lbs at 5,200 RPM
Peak torque turbo: 617 ft-lbs at 4,200 RPM
Advantage: Turbo by 56 ft-lbs

Peak HP CS: 617 HP at 6000 RPM
Peak HP turbo: 600 HP at 6000 RPM
Advantage CS by 17 HP (but over only 250-300 RPM...this is where you shift)

Average HP 2,500-6000 RPM CS: 412
Average HP 2,500-6000 RPM Turbo: 460
Advantage turbo by 48 HP

Average torque 2,500-6000 RPM CS: 494 ft-lbs
Average torque 2,500-6000 RPM Turbo: 564 ft-lbs
Advantage turbo by 70 ft-lbs

Average race HP 4,000-6000 RPM CS: 518 HP
Average race HP 4,000-6000 RPM turbo: 555 HP
Advantage turbo by 37 HP

Average race torque 4,000-6000 RPM CS: 542 ft-lbs
Average race torque 4,000-6000 RPM turbo: 585 ft-lbs
Advantage turbo by 43 ft-lbs

So, many people who read and post on this board would automatically go straight for the highest peak HP number and say "617 is more than 600, so the 617 HP car must be faster" WRONG, dead wrong! You must consider powerband width and this is where the turbo is so clearly superior over the CS. In fact for street driving the TS is also superior. This is the reason you see both compressors of this style on factory forced induced cars.

From the article:

"Now forget the peak numbers and check out the rest of the curve. From 2,500-5,700 RPM, the turbo posted significant power gains over the Paxton. Given equal vehicles, the turbo would easily motor away from the centrifugal in an accelleration contest".

Dave, you claim it doesn't matter until it is proven on a 928. I've already done that and showed how a turbo 3-spd 4.5 liter was 0.3 seconds quicker across a 1/4 mile than an equally boosted 4.5 liter CS car with a 5-speed. 35% less time 0-60 and 15% less 1/4 mile time. Can you say the same of your setup?

What else is possibly required to come to an educated decision on this matter?

You are just mad because someone has the facts to prove you wrong. Get over it and be prepared to back up your bogus statements the next time you make them.
Old 12-29-2005, 05:20 PM
  #154  
Ketchmi
Drifting
 
Ketchmi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Bountiful, Utah
Posts: 2,050
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Yup, right down the tubes but I expected it also. Most people are so tired of reading it that they won't bother to respond but I had to say something.

John, until you actually get your *** into a 10psi+ CS car and see what the hell I'm talking about, I'm done with you.
Old 12-29-2005, 05:29 PM
  #155  
Imo000
Captain Obvious
Super User
 
Imo000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,846
Received 337 Likes on 244 Posts
Default

John,

This is called MAGAZINE RACING. Kids on the Honda borad love doing this. Evenin that artivle the total difference is less than 50hp. Is it worth spending almost twice the amount of money for only 48hp?

At 10psi either boosting method will result in very littel traction. Therefore, comparing the 2, in reallife conditions will make the difference hardly noticable.
Old 12-29-2005, 05:49 PM
  #156  
Ketchmi
Drifting
 
Ketchmi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Bountiful, Utah
Posts: 2,050
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Don't bother, he just doesn't get it.
Old 12-29-2005, 06:33 PM
  #157  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,132
Received 72 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by heinrich
I And that was in my slow 1985 auto.
I resemble that comment.... I mean its not anymore. Well, its getting better. Way Better. As in I'm at 95 at the same place I was at 82 or so on my "test road". California has these - they are called the stop lights to get on the highway entrance ramp.
Old 12-29-2005, 07:01 PM
  #158  
Old & New
Rennlist Member
 
Old & New's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Southern New England
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I just dream of a board where the thread starter has admin rights... <insert lightning bolt here>

It would be sweet to stay on topic once in a while.
Old 12-29-2005, 07:19 PM
  #159  
heinrich
928 Collector
Rennlist Member

 
heinrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 17,269
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Brendan, that was the US car
Old 12-29-2005, 07:20 PM
  #160  
heinrich
928 Collector
Rennlist Member

 
heinrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 17,269
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Bill is back with a bang.
Old 12-29-2005, 07:28 PM
  #161  
Jim_H
Banned
 
Jim_H's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: The Great Northwest
Posts: 12,264
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default



Originally Posted by Old & New
I just dream of a board where the thread starter has admin rights... <insert lightning bolt here>

It would be sweet to stay on topic once in a while.
Old 12-29-2005, 07:31 PM
  #162  
Jim_H
Banned
 
Jim_H's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: The Great Northwest
Posts: 12,264
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Unfortunately...
Originally Posted by heinrich
I for one LOVE thread hijacking, it's wht life's all about We're a bunch of people, and some of us are friends. We talk. We are not here to compile an encyclopaedia

Originally Posted by Old & New
I just dream of a board where the thread starter has admin rights... <insert lightning bolt here>

It would be sweet to stay on topic once in a while.
Old 12-29-2005, 09:08 PM
  #163  
Herr-Kuhn
Banned
 
Herr-Kuhn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Perhaps more discussion over tea and crumpets is in order?
Old 12-29-2005, 11:07 PM
  #164  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,453
Received 2,072 Likes on 1,183 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Herr-Kuhn
Perhaps more discussion over tea and crumpets is in order?
These are German cars - Wienerschnitzel & Beer is more appropriate



Quick Reply: Rear Mount Turbo Progress??????



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:11 AM.