Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Climate control and rear A/C

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-16-2005, 05:11 PM
  #1  
EB338
Racer
Thread Starter
 
EB338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: middle of nowhere, USA
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Climate control and rear A/C

I have heard more than a little talk about A/C and climate control problems with our cars and someone once told me the best solution for early cars was to convert the whole thing over to the late model parts. Is this truly the best course of action? Is the later system different? Is it truly automatic climate control like in the newer Caddi's and such where you set the temp and it does everything itself? Has anyone ever added rear A/C to an early car? How big a project is it?
Old 10-16-2005, 07:07 PM
  #2  
SharkSkin
Rennlist Member
 
SharkSkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
Posts: 12,620
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

The early cars are the simplest and most reliable IMHO. The AC is either on or off, it does what you tell it. Cars from '80 on (IIRC) have the climate control with inside & out temp sensors. This is a more complex system, and I think you would have to replace the console unless you could drill your old one and find a way to mount the temp sensor. From what I can make out in the PET parts software, the main HVAC box is different and would need to be changed out. That's all the parts between the vents in the console and the blower, essentially.

Rear AC would be a huge PITA to add IMHO, since there are hard lines that can't be retrofitted without pulling the engine or cutting them and having an AC shop splice it back together. Then there is all the wiring, the rear AC controls that go in the lower section of the console....

IMHO it would be cheaper to just buy a shark that has climate control and rear AC already if that's what you want. It might even cost you less than modifying your early shark, especially if you would pay for most of the labor.

FWIW, I put a Griffiths compressor on my shark, 2 new hoses & one rebuilt hose, and the system is adequate for a black on black Calif. car. Around $1000, including what I paid the AC guy to do the final leak check, vac & charge. I did all other work myself.
Old 10-16-2005, 08:45 PM
  #3  
EB338
Racer
Thread Starter
 
EB338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: middle of nowhere, USA
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My real interest came from being told the best solution was late model component upgrade so I figured if that had to be done why not get all the toys in the process. My car will be largely apart in the process of its rebuild anyhow so that is not a real concern. The Griffiths compressor is an upgrade from the original unit? Did you go with 134 or R12? Mine too is black on black so cooling performance is my primary concern and my main reason for considering the rear a/c upgrade. If the factory system of the early cars like mine can be brought up to par I don't see the point in converting. Any other A/C upgrades anyone would recommend other than the compressor?
Old 10-16-2005, 10:20 PM
  #4  
IcemanG17
Race Director
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,270
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

EB
The HVAC in newer 928's (MY83 & newer) is a semi full climate control, like dave mentioned it uses an outside (on alternator) and inside (on dash) temp sensor...both fail occasionally and cause odd problems. The temp sensor readings and your choice of temp-vent determines how the system reacts.... In general the achilles heel of our HVAC systems is the vacuum system, look at the post I just put up today! The vacuum actuators leak and fail on almost every 928 out there, which causes all sorts of problems, typically constant heat & poor A/C.

Retrofitting a rear A/C unit would be very complicated and expensive! I don't think its worth it, just keep whatever system your MY has and make sure it works properly....the A/C system has enough capacity to cool a small car like the 928! Personally I would keep R12, R134 has gotten much more expensive and doesn't work as well as R12! A properly running R12 system should have air temps around 50 degrees colder than ambient!! I have seen air temps at my center vent as low as 20 degrees! That is with a broken Recir flap too, so 50 degree differential on fresh air!
Old 10-16-2005, 10:33 PM
  #5  
EB338
Racer
Thread Starter
 
EB338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: middle of nowhere, USA
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ice:

I was just reading your post actually, sounds like a huge headache I don't want if I can help it. Like I said, the ONLY reason was even considering it is that I was told the later parts were the cure for early model problems, but to me it sounds like quite the opposite.
Old 10-16-2005, 10:59 PM
  #6  
SharkSkin
Rennlist Member
 
SharkSkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
Posts: 12,620
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I went R134a when it was a LOT cheaper than R-12. Seems to be working fine, though not ice cold if I'm not moving and the front fan hasn't engaged yet. There are some details, like a different control switch for the 134, but essentially it works. The Griffiths kit is in the neighborhood of $700, with mounting bracket, hoses, compressor, clutch, and dryer. The coolant return hose is not included in the kit; rebuild yours for ~$60 or replace for $300+ new.
Old 10-20-2005, 11:58 PM
  #7  
Randy V
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Randy V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Insane Diego, California
Posts: 40,450
Received 97 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Actually, due to the additional potential problems it presents, later model cars with the rear AC delete option are typically more desireable to those who know these beasts.
Old 10-21-2005, 03:19 AM
  #8  
OrionKhan
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
OrionKhan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SoCal
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Randy V
Actually, due to the additional potential problems it presents, later model cars with the rear AC delete option are typically more desireable to those who know these beasts.
I would agree with that. I just went through fixing a leak back there and replacing the rear expansion valve. A PITA for someone that rarely uses the rear AC. I would remove it if it wasn't another PITA.



Quick Reply: Climate control and rear A/C



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:49 PM.