944 vs 928 - Interior Space
#16
Here's a good look at the cargo space of the 928S:
As you can see, you could carry enough arms and munitions to supply an infantry squad for a hard day of combat(the rear seats do fold forward also).
LOL...
As you can see, you could carry enough arms and munitions to supply an infantry squad for a hard day of combat(the rear seats do fold forward also).
LOL...
#17
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by mark kibort
4 x 335 x 18" rims, tools , jack, tent, NOS tank, part bags, racing gear. beat that!
or, before racing, 217 racing skis and they didnt even make it pass the cassette holder behind the shifter (plus 2 guys ski stuff, and still a ton of room left over)
No substitute!
MK
or, before racing, 217 racing skis and they didnt even make it pass the cassette holder behind the shifter (plus 2 guys ski stuff, and still a ton of room left over)
No substitute!
MK
#18
Drifting
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Sackville, Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,362
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
As a former 944 owner, I will add that the 928 seems a tad more tight in the headroom department.
As for the rear area, I'd say the 944 has more room.....remember, the hatch glass is rounded on the 944 and it is flat on the 928. Seems to be more height in the 944 rear.
As for the rear area, I'd say the 944 has more room.....remember, the hatch glass is rounded on the 944 and it is flat on the 928. Seems to be more height in the 944 rear.
#19
Three Wheelin'
I agree with 944S Boyeee. The 944 hatch area is much more "usable" than the 928, b/c the 928's hatch is soooooo sloped. The 944 seems to hold more volume, because it's less wedge shaped. I was a lot more comfortable loading the 944 up at Home Depot and I am the 928.
#20
Rennlist Member
At 6'6" and 36" inseam, I'm a tight fit in sunroof equipped 928s - although legroom is fine. For excellent headroom, my cars do not have the sunroof option.
Unless you have a very long torso, the more available sunroof cars should be fine.
Unless you have a very long torso, the more available sunroof cars should be fine.
#21
Rennlist Member
I drove a 944 before I drove and bought a 928. Funny thing is after I drove the shark, I couldn't remember ANYTHING about the 944. Oh yeah, I think it may have needed motor mounts. Just Kidding.
#22
Intermediate
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Farmington Hills, MI
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Road and Track had an article in the 80's comparing a Ferrari, the 944, the Corvette, and the 928. In the article they mention that the 928, with the rear seats folded down, has 20.3 cubic feet of cargo space.
For a mountain bike with the front wheel off, it's probably far more ideal than the 944, by about something like 4-6 cubic feet. If you're moving furniture or boxes or you actually need your 20.3 cubic feet in a cube shape, it's probably the wrong car anyway.
On the other hand, I've been fool enough to ride in the back seat of a 944. Maybe that should discount my opinion right off the bat.
For a mountain bike with the front wheel off, it's probably far more ideal than the 944, by about something like 4-6 cubic feet. If you're moving furniture or boxes or you actually need your 20.3 cubic feet in a cube shape, it's probably the wrong car anyway.
On the other hand, I've been fool enough to ride in the back seat of a 944. Maybe that should discount my opinion right off the bat.
#23
928 Collector
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
944 has more headroom and sunroof helps in this regard. 944 has side pockets in rear that give it the edge in usable trunk space. Bicycle sans front wheel fits into both. Whole lawnmower fits into 928, but not into 944 (handle folded forward).
I think the 944 is a more usable grocery getter, the rear area is less shallow but not nearly as large front-back. This is because of the 928's low roof interior as a result of the internal sunroof mechanism.
The 928's rear seats cannot be beaten in any Porsche except the Cayenne. Much more like adult seats as opposed to the toy seats in 944 and 911. Front legroom is the same story.
I think the 944 is a more usable grocery getter, the rear area is less shallow but not nearly as large front-back. This is because of the 928's low roof interior as a result of the internal sunroof mechanism.
The 928's rear seats cannot be beaten in any Porsche except the Cayenne. Much more like adult seats as opposed to the toy seats in 944 and 911. Front legroom is the same story.
#24
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by heinrich
The 928's rear seats cannot be beaten in any Porsche except the Cayenne. Much more like adult seats as opposed to the toy seats in 944 and 911. Front legroom is the same story.
#25
I own both. My 85' 944 has more passenger and luggage room than my 87' 928. I had no problem putting a bike in the back of my 944 either but I wouldn't even want try on a 928. I think on the later 944 the rear luggage compartment may be shallower than the earlier models.
#28
Hey man, a fella has to look good!
LOL, that pic was actually from a weekend trip to my uncles 30acre property in the Pocono Mtns. As you can see, i know how to pack only the essentials!
LOL, that pic was actually from a weekend trip to my uncles 30acre property in the Pocono Mtns. As you can see, i know how to pack only the essentials!
#29
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Burlington, VT/Upstate NY
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There might be more numerical space in the 928 hatch area, but the 944 holds more. I'm not sure the 928 hatch will close with a 27" tv in the back.
#30
I own both and find that the 944/951 has a lot more headroom. I haven't measured the rear hatch, but agree with others that I don't sweat putting things in the back of a 944/951, but think twice about it in the 928. Go figure... lol
Regards,
Regards,