new Ford GT vs 928
#16
Range Master
Pepsie Lite
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Pepsie Lite
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Originally Posted by m21sniper
"Adjusted for inflation, how much would a $80,000 928 be in today’s dollars?"
I adjusted the $47,000 sticker price of my 1983 928S about a year ago for inflation, and it worked out to something like $105,000 adjusted 2004 US dollars.
I adjusted the $47,000 sticker price of my 1983 928S about a year ago for inflation, and it worked out to something like $105,000 adjusted 2004 US dollars.
#17
Photoshop Bully
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
I was just reading about the cracking control arm recall. They couldn't get proper replacements fast enough so they ended up having to mill solid billet aluminum ones for $1200 each.
Last edited by tresamore; 08-25-2005 at 05:20 PM.
#18
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,536
Received 1,675 Likes
on
1,087 Posts
I'll probably jinx it or start the royal $h+t storm... but... dare I say it..... the C6 Z06 with a 500+ hp 7 liter dry-sump motor and 7:42 'ring times at half the price of the Ford GT is the killer. Sure the GT looks nice. But, I want to DRIVE the car.
#19
"You are light.....My 89GT had a sticker of $78 k and the GTS cars were closer to $90k, Run thise numbers through your time warp....bet you come closer to the buck and a half......What did a carerra cost in '89 anyone know?"
It depends on the year you're starting with when you do the calculations. The $105k estimate for an 83 is accurate in 2004 USD. The last year the 928 was made i believe it was $98,000 USD plus options, so yes, it would probably equate to even more in today's dollars. I'm too lazy to look it up.
It depends on the year you're starting with when you do the calculations. The $105k estimate for an 83 is accurate in 2004 USD. The last year the 928 was made i believe it was $98,000 USD plus options, so yes, it would probably equate to even more in today's dollars. I'm too lazy to look it up.
#20
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Mountains of GA!
Posts: 3,537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The VERY last 928 sold (1995 perlglanz)....
BASE Price - $82,260
FINAL with options: $168,539!!!!!
There's a pic of the sticker on the registry http://www.928registry.org/1995-928GTS-Pearlglanz.htm
BASE Price - $82,260
FINAL with options: $168,539!!!!!
There's a pic of the sticker on the registry http://www.928registry.org/1995-928GTS-Pearlglanz.htm
#21
Shameful Thread Killer
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Yup, Dave is right the spit storm is coming. I too, think the hot commodity in US performance is once again the Corvette. I still hate them, but it's respectful hate. Hey, no one answered my trivia question! 'Whatsa' matter McFly ---- ya ch-ch-ch-chiken!' As for the GT being a race bred car, it started out that way by the chassis, but the engine isn't anything fancy by today's standards. I wouldv'e like to seen a V12(hint), or maybe a flat motor ala F50. Beating a Modena these days isn't much of a badge of honor @ that price.
Doc
Doc
#23
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
I don't read a word that you write, but I hope you keep posting often.
Originally Posted by morganabowen
The guy from "fifth gear" (I can't remember his name) bought one, and ended up returning it, due to he poor workmanship
#24
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,536
Received 1,675 Likes
on
1,087 Posts
Originally Posted by docmirror
... Hey, no one answered my trivia question! 'Whatsa' matter McFly ---- ya ch-ch-ch-chiken!
#25
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by m21sniper
" "Don't forget the huge recall on the Ford GT where they basically had to sleeve all the cylinders or something like that. That would suck buying a $150k car and needing major engine work right from the get-go" "
"In fairness to Ford they did develop the GT in a timeframe that's really totally unheard of.
Something like 5 months from car show prototype to an actual production model.
Quite an amazing feat, really."
"In fairness to Ford they did develop the GT in a timeframe that's really totally unheard of.
Something like 5 months from car show prototype to an actual production model.
Quite an amazing feat, really."
Channelling Johnny Cochran: "An amazing feat, but incomplete."
And they had had more than 40 years to work on it. So how did they screw up the suspension and and motor? When they could have just made replicas.
#26
Nobody's going to be worrying about gaps in the bodywork when you pull up to the front door of Spago in your blood red Ford GT. The car does a perfect job of what it was meant to do: turn heads.
#27
Three Wheelin'
I don't know how we can point fingers when the door gaps on the 928 are huge. Ford can't sell replicas of the original GT's now that they need: front end crash protection, airbags, and all other assorted mandates not found when the cars were originally mfged.
#28
Next time take the test drive. I know I would. On the other hand, I would never buy a car in the first year of production, or take a maiden voyage on a ship named Titanic. My dad taught me that.
#29
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
OK what car is 6 inches longer than a 928 , 5 inches wider than a 928 , has a wheelbase nearly 8 inches longer. Oh yes it is 6 inches lower! Right the Ford GT .The real GT 40 was as the name implies only 40 inches tall rather than the 44.3 inches of the "new" GT and a much smaller lighter car. Ford determined that the target market for the GT would be a somewhat more mature group with somewhat larger proportions and demand more amenities. So the GT is said to be inspired by the GT40 when in fact they have virtually nothing in common.