Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Dry sumping

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-30-2005, 05:46 AM
  #1  
slate blue
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
slate blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,315
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default Dry sumping

Hi to all, I have just purchased my dry sump pump and lines, the pump is a 6 stage scavenge, I will utilize the standard oil pump for the pressure side, my plans are this, 4 stages in the sump, perhaps compartmentized, 2 stages for the heads. The oil reserviour shall be in the sump ala BMW M3 &5, but with the defoaming and settlement tank taking the place or the majority of the space of the large water squirter bottle. That tank will be made from carbon fibre, I will try to mould it from the water bottle. I shall have a couple of litres storage in the settlement tank also. That will be a total of eight litres.



The pump shall be placed where the air conditioning compressor currently resides. The air pump shall be discarded and a smaller air conditioning compressor placed in that location. The pump weighs 13 lb or nearly 6 kgs, the hoses are lightweight XRP.

I would also love to do away with all these drive belts, Just look how neat the BMW V10 is, wouldn't a sepentine belt be great, I know I couldn't use it for the dry sump but for the other things it would be great!


I have sold my current motor, a euro 2 valve and will replace it with another one in the short term, but with the replacement I will have the heads done, run a Motec, and build some fancy headers and exhaust. This I will then reuse when the other big motor is eventually a reality. I think 400 hp is achievable with the euro. My friend has estimated 350 flywheel hp running a Haltech with shaved heads and oversize high comp pistons. I know when I built my headers last time I achieved a gain in peak power of 13%.

So I figure that will be realistic, any thoughts? I think 400 hp should make a big difference, especially when it is done by increasing airflow and maximising effiencies. Not just by a big cam. The good part about this is that it will be definately done this year barring castastrophies. I had my fair share of those.

As to hooking up my PSD, I think I will just run the bolt setup for now, I don't have the time to hook up the electronics and from what I know it may be a questionable result anyway.

Last edited by slate blue; 05-30-2005 at 06:02 AM.
Old 05-30-2005, 05:02 PM
  #2  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,150
Received 82 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Tell us how it goes and then make a kit
Old 05-30-2005, 08:27 PM
  #3  
GlenL
Nordschleife Master
 
GlenL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 7,654
Received 29 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BrendanC
Tell us how it goes and then make a kit
Yes!
Old 05-31-2005, 11:28 AM
  #4  
heinrich
928 Collector
Rennlist Member

 
heinrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 17,269
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Greg I want to do that too (the sump thing).
Old 05-31-2005, 01:33 PM
  #5  
Lagavulin
Three Wheelin'
 
Lagavulin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New Berlin
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Your dry sump looks/sounds sweet!

Originally Posted by Greg Gray
I have sold my current motor, a euro 2 valve and will replace it with another one in the short term, but with the replacement I will have the heads done, run a Motec, and build some fancy headers and exhaust. This I will then reuse when the other big motor is eventually a reality. I think 400 hp is achievable with the euro. My friend has estimated 350 flywheel hp running a Haltech with shaved heads and oversize high comp pistons. I know when I built my headers last time I achieved a gain in peak power of 13%.

So I figure that will be realistic, any thoughts?
An otherwise completely stock 84 4.7L Euro is putting down 275 at the rear wheels with headers and a 'fancy' exhaust.

350 at the flywheel is the same as 296 rwhp, which by the way, is the same power the racers on the east coast are putting out with their 5.0L bottom-end Euros.

The difference between 296 rwhp and 275 rwhp is 21 rwhp, so the question is, is 21 addtional rwhp worth all that extra time and money? I would have to say 'no', unless of course one blew up their motor and had to replace/rebuild it anyway.

I think 400 hp should make a big difference, especially when it is done by increasing airflow and maximising effiencies. Not just by a big cam.
400 crank hp is 340 rwhp. I do not think it possible to get another 40+ rwhp without using a bigger cam in addion to porting the heads, and using a 5.0L bottom-end. The only 16v cam bigger than the 84 Euro S is Devek's, and the entire setup (..cam and springs) is $2,200. How much power do those cams put out? Does anyone have before and after dyno sheets using the Devek 16v cams?

Again, the question must be asked, is it worth all the time and money for just an additional 65 rwhp? (..340 - 275)

On the other hand, roughly the same straight-line performance increase can be had for free by removing 650 lbs from the car, not to mention improved braking and handling that accompanies the change.
Old 05-31-2005, 01:39 PM
  #6  
heinrich
928 Collector
Rennlist Member

 
heinrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 17,269
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I think we shoud have a drysump option out there, regardless the horses. Regarding weight versus small power improvements and their effect on real-world performance, excellent point ... the question is, where to lose the weight best?
Old 05-31-2005, 01:52 PM
  #7  
Fastest928
Rennlist Member
 
Fastest928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: California
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Bob DeVore, the DEV in DEVEK had developed a dry sump system that is currently used by a few 029 racers.

Simple system, dual scavenging and using the existing oil pump for feed. Very efficient.

Might want to think about this as an option. A few years back, i offered to do a batch of oil pans for this system, but no takers.

Have fun

Marc
Old 05-31-2005, 03:09 PM
  #8  
heinrich
928 Collector
Rennlist Member

 
heinrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 17,269
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Marc, I have interest, and I would love to hear more from you on this. As always there is the issue that new development by a vendor ends up kicking the end-cost over the bar I can reach. I personally thing this will happen. If you made a good drysump pan I would likely bite. Again ... price would have to be reasonable.
Old 05-31-2005, 03:27 PM
  #9  
slate blue
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
slate blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,315
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

An otherwise completely stock 84 4.7L Euro is putting down 275 at the rear wheels with headers and a 'fancy' exhaust.
350 at the flywheel is the same as 296 rwhp, which by the way, is the same power the racers on the east coast are putting out with their 5.0L bottom-end Euros.

The difference between 296 rwhp and 275 rwhp is 21 rwhp, so the question is, is 21 addtional rwhp worth all that extra time and money? I would have to say 'no', unless of course one blew up their motor and had to replace/rebuild it anyway.
Hi Lag, well the reason for this is that I have sold my engine $7500 AUD including MAF, I have sourced another 50K engine for a third of that but it has been sitting for a while and I will need to rebuild it with a gasket set and new rings. I thought, whyn't do the heads and the exhaust? I will have the Motec then, I already have the RRFPR so I can tune it easily. I don't know about increasing the size of the cam in this engine, as standard they produce max power at 5900 rpm. I will also look at the manifold in the spirit of while you are there.

So I don't want to move the power band up any higher and I figured this is only an intermediate engine and it would not cost too much money, remember I will build the headers myself and I will look at being able to adapt them to my later 32 valve engine. The Motec is a good addition, it gets away from the LH injection.
Old 05-31-2005, 03:52 PM
  #10  
FBIII
Three Wheelin'
 
FBIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Doylestown, PA
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Does dry sumping alleviate the #2 & 6 rod failures? Or is this for additional horsepower in addition to doing the crank mods?
Old 05-31-2005, 03:54 PM
  #11  
heinrich
928 Collector
Rennlist Member

 
heinrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 17,269
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

FBI that is a good question, and a MATTER OF OPINION. I have no doubt that it will eliminate failures permanently though Mark Anderson has experienced failure with a drysump.
Old 05-31-2005, 04:14 PM
  #12  
slate blue
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
slate blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,315
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I think the only prudent thing to do would be to have a modified crank, or have a stroker crank. I think the high rpm failure is separate from the sucking air type failure.
Old 11-16-2005, 04:31 PM
  #13  
evil 944t
Rennlist Member
 
evil 944t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Has anyone made a pan/kit yet? Is there an intreset in getting a kit made?
Old 11-16-2005, 04:45 PM
  #14  
heinrich
928 Collector
Rennlist Member

 
heinrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 17,269
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I remain interested. I looked Mark Anderson's setup over carefully when i had the privilege of standing under it at his shop, and it is a very simple setup which he explained to me. He has a large cylinder with much oil where our passenger seats are, and a remanufactured oil pan that is flat and a lot less voluminous from what I could see. he scavenges from there into the drysump and the drysump supplies oil to the engine directly. I love that setup. Looks entirely doable. Count me in.
Old 11-16-2005, 04:48 PM
  #15  
evil 944t
Rennlist Member
 
evil 944t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I guess my question is does someone already sell a pan etc.. ? And not a modded pan a real engineered pan.


Quick Reply: Dry sumping



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:04 AM.