Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Stroker dilemna: GoForIt or deck plate

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-28-2005, 05:45 PM
  #1  
atb
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
atb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 4,869
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
Default Stroker dilemna: GoForIt or deck plate

Here's the latest dilemna on the stroker front.
My most recent plan was to use used 968 pistons with the HPC coating. Overhoning by 7 ten thousandths to clear the coating created an interesting end gap issue with the factory rings. Filing down oversized rings would cure that, but create a potential ring backspace issue. I decided that running the used pistons was no longer an option.

Before making my next move, I went ahead and had the block sonic tested. I had measured the cylinders with calipers before I had the block bored, so I knew it was going to come out thin to begin with. I believe Reynolds has a .250" minimum thickness recommendation. I've heard (not verified) of some bored out blocks (not DEVEK motors) running close to .200". I know Marc T likes 'em thick, understandably so.

I've attached the results of my sonic test. I've got a deposit on a set of Mahle motorsport pistons, which is what I'll run if I run the block as is. Or, do I go ahead and have deck plates welded in to reinforce the cylinders and go with the JE/nikasil combo.

Curious to hear everyone's comments. Particularly if any has any info on a thin cylinder failing.

Oh, the top measurement was taken at 62mm from the top of the cylinder.

Old 02-28-2005, 05:54 PM
  #2  
Adam C
Racer
 
Adam C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Dana Point, CA
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am also using an uncoated block with uncoated 968 pistons. Why do you need a coating with factory block / piston combo?

FWIW, I am going without a deck plate.
Old 02-28-2005, 07:21 PM
  #3  
Shane
Sharkaholic
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Shane's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Rochester, WA
Posts: 5,162
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Adam after you get this up and running, do you think you are going to put any forced induction on it? Deck it!!

Old 02-28-2005, 08:23 PM
  #4  
atb
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
atb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 4,869
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Adam,

I was going to coat the 968 pistons because the set I had, had some scuffing.

-Adam
Old 02-28-2005, 08:24 PM
  #5  
atb
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
atb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 4,869
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Shane,

These rear mounted turbos that are going through development really have me interested. According to Corky Bell, it looks like 6.5 liters may be too much displacement for a single turbo. I wonder if there's room to fit two in place of the rear muffler?
Old 02-28-2005, 08:27 PM
  #6  
Fastest928
Rennlist Member
 
Fastest928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: California
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Adam,
I have other options for you ... you need to call me.

Marc
Old 02-28-2005, 08:29 PM
  #7  
Adam C
Racer
 
Adam C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Dana Point, CA
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Marc, why not post it so we can all learn?
Old 02-28-2005, 09:05 PM
  #8  
Fastest928
Rennlist Member
 
Fastest928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: California
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Adam,
I told you back when you first posted pics that it was too thin ...remember?

I have other borable blocks and also the tooling to ring this blocks, been doing it for years .. although yours maybe too thin to recover.
Old 02-28-2005, 09:52 PM
  #9  
Tom. M
Deleted
Rennlist Member
 
Tom. M's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,442
Received 194 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

Just a couple of simpleton questions...

If you deck plate it..doesn't it just hold the upper portion of the bores in place reducing movement, ?...
wouldn't a thinner wall just be prone to cracking from either bore pressure and loading from the piston?

where is the piston to cylinder wall loading the greatest...sides ? fronts? at the bottom? or at the top?...if this is known then compare greatest possible loading positions to wall thickness'...maybe workable after all if the thin wall is on a non-heavy load face?..

Just some questions and thoughts..
later
Tom
midlman@rennlist.net
89GT
Old 02-28-2005, 09:52 PM
  #10  
Barry Johnson
Burning Brakes
 
Barry Johnson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Snohomish, WA
Posts: 1,042
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Deck it buddy
Old 02-28-2005, 09:53 PM
  #11  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,147
Received 73 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

I have sent a GTS block to motorsport to deck (hopefully). I think if its a possibility that its a better solution for long range planning.

Has anyone seen how thin those walls look when they are at 104mm on the bores? VERY THIN>
Old 02-28-2005, 11:49 PM
  #12  
Lagavulin
Three Wheelin'
 
Lagavulin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New Berlin
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Adam, I think it's too late to deck-plate the block. From several sources I've heard the 928 block is difficult to weld, let alone one with very thin cylinder walls. The optimum order of operation would have been to install the deck-plate first, deck it, then bore and lap it; you would have had some really nice straight cylinders that way.

If you proceed now and put the deck-plates in after you had it bored and lapped, more than likely your cylinders will not be straigtht afterwards, and that's if you don't crack anything during the process.

Last edited by Lagavulin; 03-01-2005 at 08:29 AM. Reason: Change deck to deck-plate
Old 02-28-2005, 11:54 PM
  #13  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,147
Received 73 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

Lags right. I have been told and told again that the block can't be decked *after* its been finish bored.
Old 03-01-2005, 02:16 AM
  #14  
fst951
Rennlist Member
 
fst951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Snyders Mill, Utah
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 62 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Hi there.

Lag is right that it needs to be welded first and then machined. However, the block is weldable when the right consumables are used with a skilled welder. Still, it can crack. Its cast rather than forged and makes for a little more difficult crack propogation problem.

Good luck
Old 03-01-2005, 12:21 PM
  #15  
atb
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
atb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 4,869
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

B.C. wrote:

Lags right. I have been told and told again that the block can't be decked *after* its been finish bored.
That's assuming you are trying to save the finish on the alusil bore. I'm assuming if I go to a deck plate that I would be nikasiling the cylinders after making them round (or uh, not round) after installation of the deck plate.


Quick Reply: Stroker dilemna: GoForIt or deck plate



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:21 PM.