Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

16V max HP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-16-2005, 10:45 AM
  #1  
toofast928
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
toofast928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: N NJ
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default 16V max HP

So if the fuel system could supply, what's the max horsepower a USA 4.5L could deliver and still be streetable.

If 225 is stock, then easily 325 (SC). Push a little more 350. Could the pistons and head gaskets handle the 400 mark?...........
Old 01-16-2005, 03:15 PM
  #2  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,132
Received 72 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

I'm shooting for 300hp at the crank from a 4.5 NA. NO MAF, but heaters, Euro intake and TB. 78 Cams with some head porting, etc.
Old 01-16-2005, 07:37 PM
  #3  
SharkSkin
Rennlist Member
 
SharkSkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
Posts: 12,620
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I've heard it said that the 928 CIS system can support 400hp. Under what circumstances, with what mods, I don't know.
Old 01-16-2005, 07:40 PM
  #4  
toofast928
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
toofast928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: N NJ
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'm planning on adding a SC and convert to MAF. That should give me 340 at the crank. But I was just wondering at what HP the bottom end begins to break?
Old 01-17-2005, 05:45 PM
  #5  
Fastest928
Rennlist Member
 
Fastest928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: California
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

we managed 310 rwhp with cats and stock manifolds from a 2v euro
Old 01-17-2005, 05:51 PM
  #6  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,132
Received 72 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

5.0 or 4.7 or 4.5?
Old 01-17-2005, 06:29 PM
  #7  
FlyingDog
Nordschleife Master
 
FlyingDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Not close enough to VIR.
Posts: 9,429
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by toofast928
I'm planning on adding a SC and convert to MAF. That should give me 340 at the crank. But I was just wondering at what HP the bottom end begins to break?
If you have an 8.5:1 4.5L 450+HP should not be a problem with a supercharger... if you can supply the fuel. The problem the newer engines have with SCs is the high compression increases the likelyhood of detonation. A lower CR allows the SC to pump more air in without risking detonation. If the CIS system, or whetever you replace it with, can keep up getting over 100HP/liter shouldn't be a problem.
Old 01-17-2005, 08:33 PM
  #8  
John Struthers
User
 
John Struthers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Midland, Texas
Posts: 3,291
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Your talking a 4.5L, AFC-L injected, right?
If it's an 80' thru 82' you should be nearer 9.0 : 1 .
Perhaps a fatter/metal composite gasket to lower the CR would be in order.
Old 01-17-2005, 08:51 PM
  #9  
John Veninger
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
John Veninger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,918
Received 32 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

we managed 310 rwhp with cats and stock manifolds from a 2v euro
To bad you didn't try it with headers or were those stock manifolds from an 86?
I can't seem to get more than 305rwhp with headers and CIS injection
Old 01-17-2005, 11:32 PM
  #10  
Lance J
Pro
 
Lance J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SIN CITY,NV
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what about my 1979 4.5 liter with cis. think of have a blown beast soon as well i know our cam are more agressive than the 80-82. first stage for me is getting my gauges to monitor the system, fuel pressure, a/f ect. by then andy should have twin screw kit out. i'll drop him 3k start. i was honestly thinking off trading my near perfect 928 for a turbo those guys make hp alot easier because there already turbo.
Old 01-17-2005, 11:36 PM
  #11  
Lance J
Pro
 
Lance J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SIN CITY,NV
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

are there any piggybacks for cis. not to tune but just to monitor the system in a neat little spreedsheet data log. to help tune by hand to get opt. tuning
Old 01-18-2005, 01:08 AM
  #12  
Joe F
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joe F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 2,864
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by John Veninger
To bad you didn't try it with headers or were those stock manifolds from an 86?
I can't seem to get more than 305rwhp with headers and CIS injection
John, is that with a 4.7 or are you taliking about the 5.0 ltr block? If it is with a 4.7, then what else are you changing to get those numbers?
Thanks in advance

JF
Old 01-18-2005, 07:21 AM
  #13  
John Veninger
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
John Veninger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,918
Received 32 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

It's a 5.0L using Euro top end. Dave Lloyd hit 307rwhp, but I have a bit more torque.
Click the link to the EuroS in my sig. You can see my dyno and Dave's at the racing site. Waiting to see what Stan's new motor does!
Old 01-18-2005, 08:21 AM
  #14  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,453
Received 2,072 Likes on 1,183 Posts
Default

Any stroker 16V's out there? I know many people will squak at this idea being a waste with the S4 heads out there. Chevy is proving over and over 32 valve's are not needed for big hp numbers.
Old 01-18-2005, 08:32 AM
  #15  
FlyingDog
Nordschleife Master
 
FlyingDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Not close enough to VIR.
Posts: 9,429
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Struthers
Your talking a 4.5L, AFC-L injected, right?
If it's an 80' thru 82' you should be nearer 9.0 : 1 .
Perhaps a fatter/metal composite gasket to lower the CR would be in order.
Sorry, I looked at the wrong sig line. Even at 9:1, compression isn't very high. Saab uses 9.0-9.5:1 on their turbo cars. I think SC GM 3800 Series II engines are 9.3:1.


Quick Reply: 16V max HP



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:28 PM.