Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

One for you chaps in the Netherlands or nearby

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-16-2021, 09:30 AM
  #1  
FredR
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
FredR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oman
Posts: 9,829
Received 721 Likes on 577 Posts
Default One for you chaps in the Netherlands or nearby

https://www.carscoops.com/2021/12/da...orsche-928-s4/

Article says it is a manual 1989 S4 but was there such a thing with manual transmission in 1989?

To be fair it has S4 wheels.
Old 12-16-2021, 09:40 AM
  #2  
928cs
Race Car
 
928cs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Le Mans, France
Posts: 3,633
Received 547 Likes on 347 Posts
Default

Is it this car?
https://www.gallery-aaldering.com/porsche-928-s4-1986/

It's a 1987 S4, not a 1989, even if there was a manual S4 avaible until the end of the 1989 Model-Year.
You can spot this is a 1987 from three clues:
- Analogic dashboard (numeric was a novelty of the 1989 MY)
- No roof radio antena, new equipment of the 1989 MY.
- No cruise control, which was standard equipment from the 1988 MY.
Rear AC is unusual for a european car.
Old 12-16-2021, 09:48 AM
  #3  
FredR
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
FredR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oman
Posts: 9,829
Received 721 Likes on 577 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 928cs
Is it this car?
https://www.gallery-aaldering.com/porsche-928-s4-1986/

It's a 1987 S4, not a 1989, even if there was a manual S4 avaible until the end of the 1989 Model-Year.
.
No idea what it is or what it is not- the article came up on my mobile phone. A 1989 manual tranny S4 sounded a bit suspicious to me- no such thing for MY1990 that I do know.

Regardless seems like a nice vehicle at first glance and the article refers the seller with a name that sounds like that in your link.
Old 12-16-2021, 10:07 AM
  #4  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,565
Received 2,182 Likes on 1,232 Posts
Default

I don't know about ROW but 89 5-speed S4's were absolutely a thing in the US market.

Local friend bought this one years ago:
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...last-week.html

They have the G28/12 transmission with a 2.64 final drive
Old 12-16-2021, 10:22 AM
  #5  
Adamant1971
Rennlist Member
 
Adamant1971's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,469
Received 1,070 Likes on 508 Posts
Default

There were 89s4 5spds in Europe as well. IIRC in total 244 world wide.
Old 12-16-2021, 10:55 AM
  #6  
belgiumbarry
Three Wheelin'
 
belgiumbarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,488
Received 228 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

i know that place at least.... i bought from them ,years ago , my second '70 BMW 2800CS which i recently sold. It was my "spare" car for the "rally" CS , now i'm rebuilding that one to street legal again.
For rally i have now the 928.... if i ever do it again
Old 12-16-2021, 11:02 AM
  #7  
Gary Knox
Rennlist Member
 
Gary Knox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 3,381
Received 453 Likes on 225 Posts
Default

I owned a '89 5 speed 928 S4. for quite a few years, and it was primarily my track car. The first approximately half of the production year (VIN's ending below 1000) manual transmissions were S4's.. All post 1000 VIN's with manual were GT's, At least that's the story for North American production as far as I'm aware.
Old 12-16-2021, 11:21 AM
  #8  
belgiumbarry
Three Wheelin'
 
belgiumbarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,488
Received 228 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

in the end , what was so "special" on a GT ? Wasn't it a Porsche merchandise program , now sales were down ? What was it more then a manual S4 ?
Old 12-16-2021, 11:28 AM
  #9  
Gary Knox
Rennlist Member
 
Gary Knox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 3,381
Received 453 Likes on 225 Posts
Default

Barry,

Different cams, comes on strong at about 4K rpm. 10 more horsepower as I recall, and I think the diff was a 2.73. Otherwise essentially the same.

Yes, Porsche was in financial trouble for the late '80's, early 90's. The SUV program, combined with Toyota manufacturing procedures probably saved them (also, maybe some of the major financial stuff going on within the family and VW).
Old 12-16-2021, 11:37 AM
  #10  
928 GT R
Rennlist Member
 
928 GT R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Back 0 Beyond
Posts: 6,051
Received 5,314 Likes on 2,046 Posts
Default

GT's also had rolled fenders and quarter panels, short shifter, wider Club Sport or D90 wheels with spacers a different fuel map to go with the aggressive cams and a lightweight exhaust.

Drive a GT back to back with an S4 5-speed and it will take about two seconds to know that it is a dramatically improved beast.



The following users liked this post:
Harvey928 (12-17-2021)
Old 12-16-2021, 11:53 AM
  #11  
belgiumbarry
Three Wheelin'
 
belgiumbarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,488
Received 228 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 928 GT R
GT's also had rolled fenders and quarter panels, short shifter, wider Club Sport or D90 wheels with spacers a different fuel map to go with the aggressive cams and a lightweight exhaust.

Drive a GT back to back with an S4 5-speed and it will take about two seconds to know that it is a dramatically improved beast.
strange, with 10 HP more ? i assume most average drivers wouldn't even feel it.
Old 12-16-2021, 02:05 PM
  #12  
Gary Knox
Rennlist Member
 
Gary Knox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 3,381
Received 453 Likes on 225 Posts
Default

Barry,

It is the mid range torque when the cams 'come on' that is very noticeabe with the GT, Also, the differential of 2.73 give slightly enhanced acceleration than the 2.64 that was in the '89 S4 manual. Having driven both - yes there is a difference. Personally, I liked the '89 better, but that's just me, most people like the higher revving (both red line and rpm per road speed) GT. I actually like the 2.54 diff best of all the 928's ('87+ only) that I've owned.

Old 12-16-2021, 02:54 PM
  #13  
928cs
Race Car
 
928cs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Le Mans, France
Posts: 3,633
Received 547 Likes on 347 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gary Knox
Barry,

It is the mid range torque when the cams 'come on' that is very noticeabe with the GT, Also, the differential of 2.73 give slightly enhanced acceleration than the 2.64 that was in the '89 S4 manual. Having driven both - yes there is a difference. Personally, I liked the '89 better, but that's just me, most people like the higher revving (both red line and rpm per road speed) GT. I actually like the 2.54 diff best of all the 928's ('87+ only) that I've owned.
The Euro Manual S4s always had the same G28/12 gearbox as the US Manual 1989 S4.
In short, a GT is manual S4 with CS engine/gearbox/exhaust/wheels. And yes, you can feel the difference. The S4 could be easier as a DD, as you don't have to push as much for the same torque. But a GT driven in anger is really funny.
I prefer a GT rather than a manual GTS.
Old 12-16-2021, 04:39 PM
  #14  
belgiumbarry
Three Wheelin'
 
belgiumbarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,488
Received 228 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Gary , 2.73 versus 2.64 is 3%...... rear tires of one grade lower profile would already give more result then that.
Old 12-16-2021, 11:15 PM
  #15  
the flyin' scotsman
Rennlist Member
 
the flyin' scotsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Southern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 10,710
Received 53 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

local buddy here in Canada has an ex Japanese '89 928 5 speed with a 2:64 diff, so different to my S4 auto 2:20 diff and so so different to the GTS 5 speed 2:73 diff



Quick Reply: One for you chaps in the Netherlands or nearby



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:33 AM.