Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Sanity check on rear half shaft bolt torque

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-03-2018, 10:57 PM
  #1  
mj1pate
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
mj1pate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,792
Received 120 Likes on 82 Posts
Default Sanity check on rear half shaft bolt torque

ive just replaced the automatic transmission mounts and have reconnected the two rear half shafts.

Thd WSM as I read it gives 61 ft-lbs for the hex bolts that secure the half shafts to the transmission. Am I reading that torque correctly? Seems pretty high.
thanks
Old 10-03-2018, 11:12 PM
  #2  
Rob Edwards
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
 
Rob Edwards's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 17,646
Received 2,816 Likes on 1,375 Posts
Default

I prefer 66.
Old 10-04-2018, 09:06 AM
  #3  
SwayBar
Rennlist Member
 
SwayBar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago Bears
Posts: 3,583
Received 352 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mj1pate
ive just replaced the automatic transmission mounts and have reconnected the two rear half shafts.

Thd WSM as I read it gives 61 ft-lbs for the hex bolts that secure the half shafts to the transmission. Am I reading that torque correctly? Seems pretty high.
thanks
That is the correct value via the WSM and I've used it successfully over the years.

What's the thought on using 66?
Old 10-04-2018, 09:57 AM
  #4  
FredR
Rennlist Member
 
FredR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oman
Posts: 9,936
Received 767 Likes on 612 Posts
Default

Most fasteners are designed to be stressed to about 70% of yield to give a reasonable factor of safety so over torquing a bolt by 10% generally speaking is neither here nor there. On the other hand does anyone really think that Porsche did not know what they were doing when they specified a torque for a specific bolt or did not amend the WSM specs if they found they were too little?

When I challenged Porsche over the problem with the flexplate clamp slipping issue 20 years ago they told there was no problem with the system- when we demonstrated that there was a problem within half an hour they came back to the local agents whio I had been prodding with the now famous [infamous?] "fix" to use a new bolt and over torque by 10%- and that did eff all! I was then trying to develop a solution with some of my professional colleagues when I found this list upon introduction of the internet to Oman in the public domain and lo and behold Earl Gillstrom suggested the Loctite solution- I think my S4 was the second vehicle in the world to have this applied a couple of days later and problem solved and still being applied on my current 928. With hindsight maybe we could have tightened it even more by taking that bolt to 90% of yield [which it would have sustained] and maybe that might have worked but the stock item did not on my car at least [and many others that have had their engines wrecked].

Bottom line if the system works and applies the necessary clamping force why would one feel a need to add more? A technocrat [fool?] can tell you if you add twice as much concrete to the house foundation it will take twice the load- an engineer will tell you how much is needed and no more!
Old 10-04-2018, 11:00 AM
  #5  
davek9
Rennlist Member
 
davek9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bloomfield, MI
Posts: 5,191
Received 384 Likes on 207 Posts
Default

Make sure the threads are clean of all grease(not just the bolts) a dab of Blue Loctite won't hurt, torque to 66ft lbs like Rob E. said, then check em after 100 miles or so.
Never had one come loose, even with 928's putting down 500+ RWHP

Also the same w/ the TT clamp bolts, 66ft lbs.

Dave K



Quick Reply: Sanity check on rear half shaft bolt torque



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:16 PM.