Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

How effective is your aero?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-31-2016, 11:15 PM
  #31  
Noahs944
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
Noahs944's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 4,015
Received 229 Likes on 168 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 924srr27l
You forgot to mention why or how it adds downforce, because less air is travelling underneath the car after the vent.
R
Yes, but also the air that goes through the hood vent is not adding to pressure the car down because it's on top. An absolutely brilliant concept.
Old 11-01-2016, 02:16 AM
  #32  
Dash01
Burning Brakes
 
Dash01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DasSilberWedge
Some fun ads/press release material from back in the day.. But really its a question for the boys down under!
See the air pressure graph above, and take in cooling air at point 4 and exit it at point 11. That's the path the cooling air would take if and as it can. At speed the car becomes a linear pump.

This also relieves high pressure at the stagnation point (~4) and vents it at the area of high lift (~11), so you simultaneously get better inter-cooler performance and reduced drag and lift. Great way to dump unwanted engine bay heat, too.
Old 11-01-2016, 08:45 AM
  #33  
924srr27l
Burning Brakes
 
924srr27l's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Noahs944
Yes, but also the air that goes through the hood vent is not adding to pressure the car down because it's on top. An absolutely brilliant concept.

It's nothing new and has been used in Competition for decades...

Here's one example from 1969





R
Old 11-01-2016, 08:52 AM
  #34  
924srr27l
Burning Brakes
 
924srr27l's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by odurandina
the 944 suffers from significant front end float after 115mph. the front end of the 944 'get's very light' past 130mph.
.
Wow, this sounds scary!

I've not been past 120.., but another member on here has a 931 that does a genuine 165mph ! that must be doing a Wheelie! with the severe front lift?


How about this...?





R
Old 11-01-2016, 09:15 AM
  #35  
morghen
Three Wheelin'
 
morghen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Europe > Romania
Posts: 1,619
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by odurandina
the 944 suffers from significant front end float after 115mph.
How do you know that? whats significant? how many milimiters..inches...feet?


Originally Posted by odurandina
the front end of the 944 'get's very light' past 130mph. it is what it is. ....drastic measures, including complete aftermarket noses and splitters are required, and regularly done to add downforce up front.
Required in order to do what?


Originally Posted by odurandina
The 968 was designed in a wind tunnel
So was the 924 and the 944, but the target was lower, both the 924 and 944 were not designed to spend much time above 110mph nor to corner above that speed...the 968 on the other hand was designed for higher speed driving.
Old 11-01-2016, 12:34 PM
  #36  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,499
Received 633 Likes on 490 Posts
Default

While I don't doubt there are significant lift forces on a stock 944 at speed, I don't buy the statement that it's sketchy at speed...I've heard that before, entirely from the V8-swappers who are trying to defend for the added nose-weight...

I have taken my 944 to 120-130mph plenty of times in the last 11 years...and I've said it a lot...it drives/feels the same as half that speed, just a lot more wind noise...
Old 11-01-2016, 01:25 PM
  #37  
odurandina
Team Owner
 
odurandina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: one thousand, five hundred miles north of Ft. Lauderdale for the summer.
Posts: 28,704
Received 212 Likes on 153 Posts
Default

Then you'll like my car at 170mph. it feels more like a brick,

as in 'dammit this thing is planted' than 150mph.

i'm gonna have to do a very well built belly pan/splitter, though, if i plan on getting near the forbidden zone.
Old 11-01-2016, 01:56 PM
  #38  
91K-Man
Registered User
 
91K-Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Oakville Ontario Canada
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Wind Tunnel testing will give the answers. Stock 944t has about 70 lbs lift @120 mph. www.mantissport.ca
Attached Images   
Old 11-01-2016, 02:22 PM
  #39  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,499
Received 633 Likes on 490 Posts
Default

so the force on the tires is ~70 lbs less than the weight of the car when parked?
Old 11-01-2016, 02:40 PM
  #40  
Dash01
Burning Brakes
 
Dash01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Do the undertray and front splitter, and you may not need draggy downforce wings, especially if you do a proper diffuser at the rear, too.

Study Bernoulli's law, noting that pressure varies inversely with air speed: The faster the air, the lower the pressure. Have another look at the pressure point graphs above. With a front splitter, undertray, and diffuser less air goes under the car (reducing pressure underneath); the air that does go underneath is flowing WAY faster and more efficiently (less pressure and uplift); and the rear diffuser of <~15 degree upslope causes the exiting air to flow upwards with subsequent downforce vector while simultaneously filling in the turbulent zone behind the car: Less drag and more downforce.

As for speed in an aerodynamically unmodified car, ask Brian from Vancouver (has Family Guy dog avatar). About 12 years ago he, I, and about 30 other Porsche guys did a yuuge high speed ratrace through the southern BC interior. (Pics were posted on this website, so may be archived here.) As I recall, he tested his 944 Turbo to top speed, which was 160ish, evidently with no ill effects. He can tell you about stability at high speed in aerodynamically stock configuration.
Old 11-01-2016, 08:01 PM
  #41  
Noahs944
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
Noahs944's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 4,015
Received 229 Likes on 168 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dash01
and the rear diffuser of <~15 degree upslope causes the exiting air to flow upwards with subsequent downforce vector while simultaneously filling in the turbulent zone behind the car: Less drag and more downforce.
Dash01, I enjoy reading your comments very much.

Would you kindly provide a picture as an example? I'm having difficulty visualizing this type of diffuser.
Old 11-01-2016, 08:41 PM
  #42  
DasSilberWedge
Racer
 
DasSilberWedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 395
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket
While I don't doubt there are significant lift forces on a stock 944 at speed, I don't buy the statement that it's sketchy at speed...I've heard that before, entirely from the V8-swappers who are trying to defend for the added nose-weight...

I have taken my 944 to 120-130mph plenty of times in the last 11 years...and I've said it a lot...it drives/feels the same as half that speed, just a lot more wind noise...
+1. I've had my S2 at the same speed on multiple occasions and it felt fine..
Old 11-02-2016, 03:47 AM
  #43  
morghen
Three Wheelin'
 
morghen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Europe > Romania
Posts: 1,619
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket
so the force on the tires is ~70 lbs less than the weight of the car when parked?

Fill up your washer fluid and don't clean it of dead insects and you should be back to normal
Old 11-02-2016, 05:45 AM
  #44  
Voith
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Voith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 8,385
Received 647 Likes on 409 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket
R-- iirc the 951 was 0.33 with its revised aero
Interesting fact, w201 also is 0.33 and compared to 951 looks like a brick.


Old 11-02-2016, 04:04 PM
  #45  
Dash01
Burning Brakes
 
Dash01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Noahs944
Dash01, I enjoy reading your comments very much.

Would you kindly provide a picture as an example? I'm having difficulty visualizing this type of diffuser.
Google images for coroplast diffuser, coroplast undertray, coroplast belly pan, etc. and click on the pics for further information. Ecomodder.com aerodynamics forum has scads of posts on this, as well as efficiency measurements of before and after fuel economy, and methods of attachment. Zip ties work well. Also look at what Ecomodders has done with pizza pan wheel covers, to smooth air flow. I'm not suggesting pizza pan wheel covers on a Porsche, but such aero research very strongly suggests using Porsche sewer lid or Design 90 wheels. I use D90 wheels because they are virtually as light as Fuchs, probably stronger, WAY more streamlined, but at a fraction the cost. Not bad looking, either.

Google images for, say, "Ferarri diffuser" and note the upswept angle of the rear diffuser, the flow fences, etc. This could easily be made of Coroplast. The air flowing from under the car is faired gently upward under the rear bumper, filling in the turbulent wake, and giving some negative lift, i.e., downforce into the bargain.

Election day is next Tuesday, so 4x8 Coroplast political signs will be taken down soon. Get a couple, preferably ~1/2" or so thickness. This may be the ONLY contribution most politicians will ever make to improving your life... Besides, you'd be doing a public service by removing roadside eyesores.

If you don't like the politician, remove the writing with a rag wet with acetone or paint thinner. Nobody will notice your new belly pan hidden under your car, so you won't get snarky comments from Porsche purists.

Also, ask your local library to borrow a copy of Hucho's book on auto aerodynamics. Inter-library loan from, say, a college engineering library, will cost you nothing to borrow for a few weeks, study, make copies of relevant sections, etc.

In the 1930s the Germans were decades ahead of everybody else. No car yet has come remotely close to the 1938 Schoerwagen pill bug in aerodynamic efficiency.

PS: Using short tufts of yarn, dental floss, string, etc. and bits of tape, attach to your car around wheel wells, mirrors, rear hatch, header panel, nose, etc. and have someone take pictures at at highway speed. An attached GoPro camera would be perfect for this, too. You want the indicated airflow to be straight from front to rear, without waving or backflow. You'll find much improved flow with wheels most flush to the side of the car, teardrop mirrors, and good fairing around the lower front tires.


Quick Reply: How effective is your aero?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:40 AM.