Need More Grip
#31
Rennlist Member
One interesting thing you should come away with after you do your reading: Springs and sway bars have no effect on ultimate total weight transfer in a corner ie steady state weight transferred to the outside set of tires in a turn. Total weight transfer is only a function of car weight, center of gravity height, and track width.
#32
Rennlist Member
When the car experiences body roll, the outside of the car gets lower and closer to the pavement, and the inside gets farther or higher from the pavement. However, the center of gravity stays the same distance away from the pavement.
A Suzuki Samurai has a higher center of gravity than a 944 because of its higher ride height and body size/construction. But for no other reason. If you reduced its ride height and put some lead in the floor, it could have the same CG as a 944. But, would it have the same roll center? Probably not... would it have the same spring/wheel rates? probably not... would it have the same swaybar rates? probably not...
#33
Burning Brakes
"Center of gravity", by its definition, is the point which does NOT change. Assuming your car is symmetric (which they really aren't... the battery is on one side, the driver on the other, etc.) the center of gravity is at some point on the centerline of the car. (But really it's offset to one side a little bit.)
When the car experiences body roll, the outside of the car gets lower and closer to the pavement, and the inside gets farther or higher from the pavement. However, the center of gravity stays the same distance away from the pavement.
A Suzuki Samurai has a higher center of gravity than a 944 because of its higher ride height and body size/construction. But for no other reason. If you reduced its ride height and put some lead in the floor, it could have the same CG as a 944. But, would it have the same roll center? Probably not... would it have the same spring/wheel rates? probably not... would it have the same swaybar rates? probably not...
When the car experiences body roll, the outside of the car gets lower and closer to the pavement, and the inside gets farther or higher from the pavement. However, the center of gravity stays the same distance away from the pavement.
A Suzuki Samurai has a higher center of gravity than a 944 because of its higher ride height and body size/construction. But for no other reason. If you reduced its ride height and put some lead in the floor, it could have the same CG as a 944. But, would it have the same roll center? Probably not... would it have the same spring/wheel rates? probably not... would it have the same swaybar rates? probably not...
#34
Rennlist Member
The center of gravity is above the roll center, which is why the car rolls in a corner. If the car rotates on the roll center, then the center of gravity moves, contributing the weight transfer.
#35
Rennlist Member
I see what you guys are saying, but the CG will move far less relative to the road surface than the roll center will. Roll centers move all over the place as suspension arms move up and down.
My kids get a great kick out of the notion that since they, too, have mass, when they jump up, the earth moves away from them a very little bit - then it moves back to meet them as they come back down to land on it. (For every action there's an equal and opposite reaction.)
But CG is like the earth's movement and the roll center is like the kids' movement.
My kids get a great kick out of the notion that since they, too, have mass, when they jump up, the earth moves away from them a very little bit - then it moves back to meet them as they come back down to land on it. (For every action there's an equal and opposite reaction.)
But CG is like the earth's movement and the roll center is like the kids' movement.
#36
Advanced
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Greater Atlanta, GA
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The "center of gravity" is more accurately noted as the center of the vehicle mass. The majority of this is sprung mass (everything supported by the springs/torsion bars). This center does not move relative to the chassis so if the chassis moves than the center of mass moves.
The roll center is a misnomer, it does not mean that the vehicle rotates about this axis the point that it rolls about depends on the roll stiffness, suspension geometry, tire spring rates and etc.
Now for the center of mass to move far enough to the outside (loaded side) to make a significant change in grip levels is a lot. For example on some bias ply Hooiser Racing slicks (Formula Ford tires) the data I have worked with showed no significant (defined here as loss of 0.1 lateral G) loss in grip until about 15% track width shift of center of mass. So for a 944 that would mean that the chassis would have to shift over 8" towards the outside, which doesn't happen. So its as Van said, the center of mass doesn't move enough to make an effect especially when considering all the other parameters that vary grip.
Hopefully this helped clear up the "center of gravity" movement issue without a whole bunch of boring details.
Onto the original issue, would raising the rear ride height help a little bit? My thought is since he's heading uphill he could be over cambering the outside tire reducing thrust capacity from the tire? I haven't raced a 944 so this is just a guess.
The roll center is a misnomer, it does not mean that the vehicle rotates about this axis the point that it rolls about depends on the roll stiffness, suspension geometry, tire spring rates and etc.
Now for the center of mass to move far enough to the outside (loaded side) to make a significant change in grip levels is a lot. For example on some bias ply Hooiser Racing slicks (Formula Ford tires) the data I have worked with showed no significant (defined here as loss of 0.1 lateral G) loss in grip until about 15% track width shift of center of mass. So for a 944 that would mean that the chassis would have to shift over 8" towards the outside, which doesn't happen. So its as Van said, the center of mass doesn't move enough to make an effect especially when considering all the other parameters that vary grip.
Hopefully this helped clear up the "center of gravity" movement issue without a whole bunch of boring details.
Onto the original issue, would raising the rear ride height help a little bit? My thought is since he's heading uphill he could be over cambering the outside tire reducing thrust capacity from the tire? I haven't raced a 944 so this is just a guess.
#37
Race Car
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Austin TX, drinking beer in the garage
Posts: 3,602
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
I see what you guys are saying, but the CG will move far less relative to the road surface than the roll center will. Roll centers move all over the place as suspension arms move up and down.
My kids get a great kick out of the notion that since they, too, have mass, when they jump up, the earth moves away from them a very little bit - then it moves back to meet them as they come back down to land on it. (For every action there's an equal and opposite reaction.)
But CG is like the earth's movement and the roll center is like the kids' movement.
My kids get a great kick out of the notion that since they, too, have mass, when they jump up, the earth moves away from them a very little bit - then it moves back to meet them as they come back down to land on it. (For every action there's an equal and opposite reaction.)
But CG is like the earth's movement and the roll center is like the kids' movement.