Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Too Fast!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-20-2001, 09:13 AM
  #1  
Dave
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Springfield NJ
Posts: 4,937
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Post Too Fast!!!

Can someone explain how this can happen. On my way to work this morning, I turned on my G-Tech for the 2 short sections of highway, imagine my suprise when the unit read 6.19. I figured right away that there was some sort of error, and reset the unit for the second run. This time was a little more realistic, 6.30. With no new mods, let alone major mods, there is no way my NA is really doing these times. Can a G-Tech go out of calibration? Has anyone heard of this? Or did gravity switch directions this morning?
Old 08-20-2001, 03:53 PM
  #2  
Craig944
Banned
 
Craig944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

These were your 0-60 times?
Were you completely stopped?
Does the car 'feel' that fast? (comparing it to maybe anotyer car you've driven in that ran a similar posted time)(
Old 08-20-2001, 05:15 PM
  #3  
Dave
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Springfield NJ
Posts: 4,937
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Post

Yep, dead stopped.
Correct again, 0-60, now you get where I'm going with this.
It felt like a quick run, but no quicker than my previous best. Normal would be 6.9 to 7.05, depending on conditions. Today was on the cool side, but not enough to account for 3/4 second.
Old 08-20-2001, 06:36 PM
  #4  
Craig944
Banned
 
Craig944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Dave you're the one that runs a 6.9? hehehe what's the temperature there? What modificatons do you have?
Old 08-20-2001, 08:16 PM
  #5  
951carter
Racer
 
951carter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: richmond
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

are you guys "zero-ing" it out before you take off? it needs to read 0.00 before you go. maybe porsche just advertised these cars as being 1-2 sec slower 0-60 than they really are, uh, i doubt it.
Old 08-20-2001, 08:23 PM
  #6  
Craig944
Banned
 
Craig944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Carter, yes I zero it.
The '83's are faster than the '86's and such, 'nuff said. It's alot damn lighter. You ride in it w/ me then ride in an '86 or something you can tell the difference.
Old 08-20-2001, 08:54 PM
  #7  
Macabre
Instructor
 
Macabre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

You were probably on a grade.. if the ground isn't completely flat you need to make a run in both directions and average the two. You're right, there's no way your NA is really doing those times . If you left the unit in the sun it's possible that the gunk the g-sensor is suspended in was affected and is no reading incorrectly.
Old 08-22-2001, 07:44 PM
  #8  
Dave
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Springfield NJ
Posts: 4,937
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Post

Craig, Yeah, I'm the one. 65-68 Deg. that morning. I've been thru the mods a few times on this board.

Carter, 0.0 then -GO-, I've heard that ALL Porsches are quicker than advertised, a few tenths usually. I don't claim to understand the concept, but I've heard that Porsche rates HP, torque and other performance figures conservativly.

Craig, again, Check the FAQ for weight info. You'll find the 86 is lighter than the 83.

Macabre, The first run was on Rt 22 West, Second was Rt 22 East, Avg. is 6.25. According to my 7 1/2 min map the area is flat. The car was in the shade until 6:50 AM, this was at 7:05 and 7:07. I am thinking along the same lines that there is an internal issue with the unit. My object with this thread was to find out if anyone had had any problems with a G-tech unit before. No? Anyone?
Old 08-22-2001, 08:30 PM
  #9  
Craig944
Banned
 
Craig944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I don't see how anything could be lighter than an '83. Powersteering, ABS, Anti Lock brakes, all add weight. Besides my 83 is lighter than stock by a good bit. We've done some weight loss stuff to it, along with the paint.
Old 08-22-2001, 08:34 PM
  #10  
Craig944
Banned
 
Craig944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Introduced in the US as a 1983 model. These early cars are lighter than the later cars. The interior is a transplant from the 924. These cars were largely based on the 924 Turbo in that the maintained basically the same body (except for the larger wheel arches), the ventilated brake discs, and suspension. The 5-speed gearbox was an Audi transplant, while the automatic was from VW.

---From the FAQ
Old 08-22-2001, 09:14 PM
  #11  
Dave
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Springfield NJ
Posts: 4,937
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Post

Introduced in the US as a 1983 model. These early cars are lighter than the later cars.
Craig, Go back to that FAQ and check the actual numbers. By later cars it may refer to 88 and up which DID weigh more, not the cars with more aluminum parts, and still no ABS (which stand for Antilock Brakes System) or anti lock brakes. I'm sure you've done a good job of lightening your car, alot of us have lightened them up a bit, but you picked the wrong year to compare to.
Old 08-22-2001, 09:49 PM
  #12  
Craig944
Banned
 
Craig944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Whatever the FAQ says I guess. I'd like to see each model barebone on a scale side by side.
Old 08-22-2001, 10:02 PM
  #13  
Greg Hammond
Racer
 
Greg Hammond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Sparks, Maryland
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Craig - How many 86 944's have you weighed personally? If the answer is zero, how can you possibly say your car is lighter than something you haven't compared it to? The FAQ quotes factory delivered weights - the numbers are accurate, at least on average.

What did you remove to save weight?

Greg
Old 08-22-2001, 10:12 PM
  #14  
Damian in NJ
Race Director
 
Damian in NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,195
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Post

Dave, I'd like to know how you got a clear run on Rt 22 at any time of day!
Old 08-22-2001, 10:31 PM
  #15  
Craig944
Banned
 
Craig944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I don't recall claiming mine was lighter... Hahah but 'ok' thanks for the lesson. I really don't care, I don't care about anything I'm a carefree person... lalalalalala!


Quick Reply: Too Fast!!!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:40 AM.