Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

86 Turbo Billet Hubs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-12-2011, 02:10 PM
  #46  
xschop
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
xschop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,721
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

There's 4.39mm diff. to be exact at the spindle top hole which translates to 29mm
at the LCA ball-joint to bring the stub shaft back to parallel. So if the 86T doesn't get the Late control arms then the top strut mount/camber plate has to move towards the engine by 29mm, assuming the spindle camber bolt remains untouched.
Old 08-12-2011, 02:26 PM
  #47  
MAGK944
Nordschleife Master
 
MAGK944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 6,769
Received 298 Likes on 231 Posts
Default

Forgot, I had some pics I took before. 86T on right, 87T on left:

The second one shows that there is about 5mm (pushed-out) difference at the caliper points, that translates to about 3mm at the camber points on the spindle. The angle is about 4deg like you said. I'm not good at trig but if you see the last pic you have a triangle with a 4deg angle and both sides adjacent to the right-angle are 3mm and 62mm (the distance between the camber adjustments holes). If you adjust the camber at the 3mm line you don't have to move it much for a big angle movement. If you adjust further up the trianle you must move it a lot to get a small angle adjusment.

I wish I could be more scientific but my head hurts.







Old 08-12-2011, 02:38 PM
  #48  
xschop
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
xschop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,721
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

We're both on the same track. I see that you were using the CALIPER mounting pounts as reference. Which is not as exact as comparing them at the strut mount location. I have personally measured ALL 5 spindle types and the 86T spindle is the Bastard lol.

Old 08-12-2011, 03:20 PM
  #49  
ninefiveone
Rennlist Member
 
ninefiveone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: SF Bay
Posts: 1,564
Received 49 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by xschop
We're both on the same track. I see that you were using the CALIPER mounting pounts as reference. Which is not as exact as comparing them at the strut mount location. I have personally measured ALL 5 spindle types and the 86T spindle is the Bastard lol.
Exactly. I'm running '87 spindles on an early offset 951. My camber plates are maxed out (towards the engine), and then we adjust camber normally where the struts mount to the spindle.

I haven't measured but it seems like you could get at most 1 degree of camber without camber plates.
Old 08-18-2011, 09:44 PM
  #50  
xschop
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
xschop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,721
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I am going to build a few sets for the 86T that will place 87-up 300mm Turbo rotors over the hub so nothing else has to be changed. Same 86T control arms, struts, spindles and calipers remain.

Last edited by xschop; 08-21-2011 at 11:24 PM.
Old 08-21-2011, 10:24 PM
  #51  
xschop
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
xschop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,721
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Curious Question: On 86T front wheels, how far can the Hub-Bearing Cap protrude out without interfering with the Wheel Center Cap?
I'm going to machine the O.D. Of the hub to 155.00mm since most of the 9-series rotors have that interface dimension. Some newer 911 and Cayenne rotors are 157.00mm and will fit anyways. The Cayenne rotors will still need centering rings if you go that big anyways.....



When I was mic'n the hub, I couldn't believe Porsche actually cast the base of the hub with a smaller O.D. This is where most of them stress fracture at so I will make them beefier than the Later ones even....


Last edited by xschop; 08-21-2011 at 10:53 PM.
Old 09-20-2011, 06:28 PM
  #52  
xschop
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
xschop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,721
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I looked and ARP doesn't make hardened-zinc wheel studs in m14 x 1.5
So where's the best place to find black-oxide m14 x 1.5 x 50 vw/porsche wheel studs?
Old 09-21-2011, 12:41 AM
  #53  
Dimi 944
Rennlist Member
 
Dimi 944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 1,263
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Are you looking for the stock length (45 mm?) or longer?
Old 09-21-2011, 12:47 AM
  #54  
xschop
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
xschop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,721
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

The 86 Turbo studs are 45mm under the head and the 87-up are 50mm under the head. Porsche lengthened them due to the over-the-rotor hat 6mm thickness and set the later hub face back by as much.
Old 09-21-2011, 12:50 AM
  #55  
Dimi 944
Rennlist Member
 
Dimi 944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 1,263
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Paragon has various lengths of them: http://www.paragon-products.com/Sear...x=0&Search.y=0
Old 09-21-2011, 01:02 AM
  #56  
xschop
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
xschop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,721
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Thanks for the link. I wonder if they're cold-rold 10.9
At any rate $8.59 x 10ea. will bite. I don't see why re-using the 45mm studs would hurt as I have put many 8mm spacers on the 944 with no problems. This subject recently came up on Hybrids.
Old 09-21-2011, 02:23 AM
  #57  
Dimi 944
Rennlist Member
 
Dimi 944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 1,263
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

It appears that they have a better deal on the 100mm ones though. I run them on my car in front and rear.
It allows me to accommodate pretty much any spacer thickness I need.
Old 05-03-2012, 04:33 PM
  #58  
xschop
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
xschop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,721
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Alright, I'm confident on this hub design for the 86T. I have been over 15K hard-earned miles on mine and even destroyed a front tire and balljoint on a massive pothole a few months ago. After removing the studs from the factory 86T and 87 hubs, the 86T studs are only 5mm shorter than the 87-up hubs so I left the depth of the press in studs the same as factory. Once I machine the 136mm PCD of the over-the-hub rotors I can determine what size to bore the weight-reduction reliefs.....IIRC it was like 200 grams for all 5 reliefs. This should put back close to factory weight and 5-6 times the strength....



Old 05-03-2012, 07:46 PM
  #59  
MAGK944
Nordschleife Master
 
MAGK944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 6,769
Received 298 Likes on 231 Posts
Default

So these will fit the 86T spindles but with bigger
bearings correct?
Old 05-03-2012, 10:47 PM
  #60  
xschop
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
xschop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,721
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

These fit 83-85 NA and the 86T with the same size bearings to maintain maximum strength and they mount any 9-series rotor over the hub. They will have 136mm PCD setscrews in them as well. Any Brake adapter I designed for the 87-up NA or Turbo Hubs/ Spindles will now work with the NA cars with these hubs. Struts/Control Arms/ Spindles will remain untouched

I Guess I need to change the thread topic to Early NA and 86T Billet Hubs


Quick Reply: 86 Turbo Billet Hubs



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:20 AM.