How much abuse/torque can a 951 tranny take??
#1
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How much abuse/torque can a 951 tranny take??
I'm doing an engine swap and I'm just wondering how much torque the 951 tranny take? Depending on the total package I'll have between 300 and 460 ft-lbs of torque, the "problem" here is that it's available instantly, off the line, tires not turning yet so the torque doesn't build or ramp up gently it just sort of hits (unless I tweak software to allow a more gentle ramp, but what's the fun in that??).
The other question is how much torque can the stock 951 clutch hold? In a way I would like the clutch to be the weaker link and slip before snapping axles or destroying gears. But I don't want to be replacing the clutch very often either.
The other question is how much torque can the stock 951 clutch hold? In a way I would like the clutch to be the weaker link and slip before snapping axles or destroying gears. But I don't want to be replacing the clutch very often either.
#4
Rennlist Member
my upgraded cup clutch only held 350 rwhp before slipping. Now w/ a KEP i have more clamping force- 600ft/lb - i would do a solid trans mount or trans brace to keep from killing axels.
#5
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for all the input guys, looks like I'm under the HP limit but torque could be a problem. To give you a little more info it's an 11" series DC electric motor.
So I won't actually need to use the clutch to start out, as the motor will start with full torque from 0rpm. I would like to keep the clutch for shifting, even though many do without it. I will also likely be starting in 2nd gear and not use 1st at all since the electric motor has more low end torque than any gas engine that would fit in this car. I would just rather not have to replace transmission parts. I'm ok with upgrading a clutch if necessary but I would like to stay within the limits of the tranny. It'll just be a fun daily driver that might hit the autocross or drag track once in awhile.
So I won't actually need to use the clutch to start out, as the motor will start with full torque from 0rpm. I would like to keep the clutch for shifting, even though many do without it. I will also likely be starting in 2nd gear and not use 1st at all since the electric motor has more low end torque than any gas engine that would fit in this car. I would just rather not have to replace transmission parts. I'm ok with upgrading a clutch if necessary but I would like to stay within the limits of the tranny. It'll just be a fun daily driver that might hit the autocross or drag track once in awhile.
#7
Recognized you from the DIYEC board.
Thought you were set on the WarP 9?
WarP 11 or a Kostov now?
This thing is gonna be a hoot either way.
I'd rather replace CV's than a clutch...
Thought you were set on the WarP 9?
WarP 11 or a Kostov now?
This thing is gonna be a hoot either way.
I'd rather replace CV's than a clutch...
Trending Topics
#8
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am serious, I'm less than a week away from ordering the motor. I just have to decide the level of power (and expense). The conversion is going to be expensive regardless so I thought why not go all the way with the warp 11 or 11-HV (similar to what CroDriver is using on DIYEC, his motor is modified though)
The Warp 11 would have the most torque, but the 11-HV would have quite a bit more power with a bit less torque.
SirLapsalot in short, I'm ripping out everything gas related, cooling system, fuel system, exhaust system, computer, engine, swap to a manual steering rack, and replacing it all with a BIG electric motor, electronic motor controller and a fairly small pack of high current batteries. The pack voltage will be 288v and capable of 1000A continuous discharge. I'm hoping to come within a couple hundred lbs of stock weight, but going electric it will gain some weight. I just have to be careful to keep it balanced.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iOo1TnWKVCg
The above green bmw is really my inspiration to go a little bigger with my project. I'm not looking for that type of performance, just something better than any stock/mildly modified 944 turbo. (mine is starting out with as a stock '86 944 NA but it has a 951 tranny)
The bmw is capable of 0-100km/h in 3.7 seconds or less. I will be using street tires though, and have a bit less battery and motor current so in the end I'm shooting for 5ish seconds.
The Warp 11 would have the most torque, but the 11-HV would have quite a bit more power with a bit less torque.
SirLapsalot in short, I'm ripping out everything gas related, cooling system, fuel system, exhaust system, computer, engine, swap to a manual steering rack, and replacing it all with a BIG electric motor, electronic motor controller and a fairly small pack of high current batteries. The pack voltage will be 288v and capable of 1000A continuous discharge. I'm hoping to come within a couple hundred lbs of stock weight, but going electric it will gain some weight. I just have to be careful to keep it balanced.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iOo1TnWKVCg
The above green bmw is really my inspiration to go a little bigger with my project. I'm not looking for that type of performance, just something better than any stock/mildly modified 944 turbo. (mine is starting out with as a stock '86 944 NA but it has a 951 tranny)
The bmw is capable of 0-100km/h in 3.7 seconds or less. I will be using street tires though, and have a bit less battery and motor current so in the end I'm shooting for 5ish seconds.
#10
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am actually documenting the process on one of my blogs.
http://electricporsche.rwaudio.com/
Most of the progress other than engine removal is me flip flopping about what parts I'm going to use. It has changed weekly as I switched from medium cost to low cost to higher cost etc. But in the big picture it's only a variance of 15-20% of the total project cost so why not just go a bit bigger which will provide quite a performance increase.
http://electricporsche.rwaudio.com/
Most of the progress other than engine removal is me flip flopping about what parts I'm going to use. It has changed weekly as I switched from medium cost to low cost to higher cost etc. But in the big picture it's only a variance of 15-20% of the total project cost so why not just go a bit bigger which will provide quite a performance increase.
#11
Oh ok cool thanks for the link, that's the kind of thing I was hoping to see. And I would agree why not just go bigger with a 15-20% difference in price? Do it once the way you would really like it and be proud. Best of luck man
#13
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How well does a stock 944 hook up? Is it easy to break traction with too much power?
#15
Rainman
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
a stock NA with an NA gearbox can break the tires loose if you take off from 3000RPM and up. hell, my NA with a turbo gearbox could break the (fatter) tires loose. 137 ftlbs of fury...
i think itd be neat to program the controller with the transmission ratios in mind; it could be cool to have essentially the same amount of axle torque in every gear. maybe boring, but smooth...
like, if you have 400 ftlb from your motor...
951 gearbox ratios // programmed motor output
3.5:1 // 114 ftlb
2.059:1 // 195ftlb
1.4:1 // 285ftlb
1.034:1 // 386ftlb
.829:1 // 400ftlb
i think itd be neat to program the controller with the transmission ratios in mind; it could be cool to have essentially the same amount of axle torque in every gear. maybe boring, but smooth...
like, if you have 400 ftlb from your motor...
951 gearbox ratios // programmed motor output
3.5:1 // 114 ftlb
2.059:1 // 195ftlb
1.4:1 // 285ftlb
1.034:1 // 386ftlb
.829:1 // 400ftlb