Why Porsche killed the 944
#31
Racer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, eh
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The parts bin nature arose from the source of the project: Audi. The 924 was originally designed for Audi by Porsche and even after they backed out and Porsche took over it was the Audi neckarsulm factory. The 924 engine was an Audi, and it wasn't until the 944 that the cam cover said Porsche.
As for demographics, I'm afraid I WAS one of those 20-something engineers who bought a new 944 in 1983, and a new 951 in 1986. I was never interested in a 911: You can't make a racehorse out of a pig, but can make a very, very fast pig. The last thing I cared about was status, and no one considered a 944 to be a "real" porsche.
As long as all the people who buy automatics stay there, I won't feel threatened. Once I got promoted to the "A" run group, there weren't any of them around anyway.
I'm just sayin.
Regards,
doug
Waterloo, Ontario Canada, eh
86 951 (http://www.pcaucr.org/index.php/visu...egory&catid=61)
01 E320 (W210) 4matic Wagon (http://www.benzworld.org/forums/w210...body-do-2.html)
00 540i-6 (http:// http://www.trillium-bmwclub.ca/forum...sp?postid=1916)
94 855 turbo Wagon (sold in 09)
85 535i-5 (sold in 07)
76 300D (sold in 92)
83 944 (sold in 86)
I apparently only buy cars designated by numbers
As for demographics, I'm afraid I WAS one of those 20-something engineers who bought a new 944 in 1983, and a new 951 in 1986. I was never interested in a 911: You can't make a racehorse out of a pig, but can make a very, very fast pig. The last thing I cared about was status, and no one considered a 944 to be a "real" porsche.
As long as all the people who buy automatics stay there, I won't feel threatened. Once I got promoted to the "A" run group, there weren't any of them around anyway.
I'm just sayin.
Regards,
doug
Waterloo, Ontario Canada, eh
86 951 (http://www.pcaucr.org/index.php/visu...egory&catid=61)
01 E320 (W210) 4matic Wagon (http://www.benzworld.org/forums/w210...body-do-2.html)
00 540i-6 (http:// http://www.trillium-bmwclub.ca/forum...sp?postid=1916)
94 855 turbo Wagon (sold in 09)
85 535i-5 (sold in 07)
76 300D (sold in 92)
83 944 (sold in 86)
I apparently only buy cars designated by numbers
#32
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
#33
Rennlist Member
It's also amazing that Porsche got away with only a fascia change in almost 10 yrs with the single body style. Back then, most jap cars were on a 3-yr styling cycle. Even absent the tighter crash standards, they were living on borrowed time.
#34
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Small Business Partner
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Small Business Partner
If you don't like that I disagreed with a point that you made, then get over it.
Last edited by Rogue_Ant; 08-25-2010 at 12:58 AM.
#35
No, not Mosquito!
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
#36
I have to disagree with the crash standard argument...we occasionally see 944's on this board that have had really bad accidents, and almost always the driver compartment is still well intact.
It's a number of things but mainly the Boxster is the reason. At a time when Porsche was digging itself out of near bankruptcy, the 968 line was due for a complete re-design. Why do this when Porsche could introduce a more "proper" entry level car (flat six) that would share components with the upcoming 911, thus saving the company on development and production costs.
It's a number of things but mainly the Boxster is the reason. At a time when Porsche was digging itself out of near bankruptcy, the 968 line was due for a complete re-design. Why do this when Porsche could introduce a more "proper" entry level car (flat six) that would share components with the upcoming 911, thus saving the company on development and production costs.
#37
I think "M758" and "ninefiftyone" have two of the best post's so far. There are some other good ones but those two stand out for me. It is just too bad we never got the chance to see a 968 Turbo sold to the masses. Just the NA version of the 968 has very similiar 0-60 and 1/4 times as the early 951. Just think what a 968Turbo with a few mods could do. Probably sub 4 sec. 0-60, and it would still get 27 miles to the gallon. Don't know of too many cars ever made that could have competed with that.
#38
Racer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, eh
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The "problem" with a 968 turbo is that it would have been faster than the 911, or maybe the 911 turbo. Thats a marketing no no.
Regards,
doug
Waterloo, Ontario Canada, eh
86 951 (http://www.pcaucr.org/index.php/visu...egory&catid=61)
01 E320 (W210) 4matic Wagon (http://www.benzworld.org/forums/w210...body-do-2.html)
00 540i-6 (http:// http://www.trillium-bmwclub.ca/forum...sp?postid=1916)
94 855 turbo Wagon (sold in 09)
85 535i-5 (sold in 07)
76 300D (sold in 92)
83 944 (sold in 86)
I apparently only buy cars designated by numbers
Regards,
doug
Waterloo, Ontario Canada, eh
86 951 (http://www.pcaucr.org/index.php/visu...egory&catid=61)
01 E320 (W210) 4matic Wagon (http://www.benzworld.org/forums/w210...body-do-2.html)
00 540i-6 (http:// http://www.trillium-bmwclub.ca/forum...sp?postid=1916)
94 855 turbo Wagon (sold in 09)
85 535i-5 (sold in 07)
76 300D (sold in 92)
83 944 (sold in 86)
I apparently only buy cars designated by numbers
#39
Rainman
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by Jeremy Clarkson
I bet this Alfa could go faster, but that would make it faster than a Ferrari 430, and in Italy, that's a bit of a social no-no...it'd be like vomiting on the pope...sorry...
Anyways, IIRC the 968T was like 325HP, and the 964 Turbo was....320...later 360...
#40
Under the Radar
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When it became clear in the 90s that we weren't about to have a gas crisis or expensive gas, four cylinders were no longer a selling point.
#42
Racer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, eh
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Abssatively. I always wondered why they didn't slice the 928 engine the other way to make a V6.
Regards,
doug
Waterloo, Ontario Canada, eh
86 951 (http://www.pcaucr.org/index.php/visu...egory&catid=61)
01 E320 (W210) 4matic Wagon (http://www.benzworld.org/forums/w210...body-do-2.html)
00 540i-6 (http:// http://www.trillium-bmwclub.ca/forum...sp?postid=1916)
94 855 turbo Wagon (sold in 09)
85 535i-5 (sold in 07)
76 300D (sold in 92)
83 944 (sold in 86)
I apparently only buy cars designated by numbers
Regards,
doug
Waterloo, Ontario Canada, eh
86 951 (http://www.pcaucr.org/index.php/visu...egory&catid=61)
01 E320 (W210) 4matic Wagon (http://www.benzworld.org/forums/w210...body-do-2.html)
00 540i-6 (http:// http://www.trillium-bmwclub.ca/forum...sp?postid=1916)
94 855 turbo Wagon (sold in 09)
85 535i-5 (sold in 07)
76 300D (sold in 92)
83 944 (sold in 86)
I apparently only buy cars designated by numbers
#43
Drifting
Interesting discussion. I've heard that panel gaps were another big reason to let go of the 968. The mid 90s was when all the other manufacturers were getting very good at tightening up the chassis and this just couldn't be done to the 924 tub that was essentially unchanged from the 70s. So we have new crash standards and an antique suspension and tub. To go forward with the 968, a complete redesign would have been needed. The market wanted roadsters (miata, z3,etc.) and Porsche had a great flat 6 engine they could use in theirs. Maybe they thought about putting it in the front, but the obvious place was where it ended up in the Boxster.
Doug Re: V6 - too wide for the 944 chassis.
Doug Re: V6 - too wide for the 944 chassis.
#44
Racer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, eh
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK, so the Panamera is?
Regards,
doug
Waterloo, Ontario Canada, eh
86 951 (http://www.pcaucr.org/index.php/visu...egory&catid=61)
01 E320 (W210) 4matic Wagon (http://www.benzworld.org/forums/w210...body-do-2.html)
00 540i-6 (http:// http://www.trillium-bmwclub.ca/forum...sp?postid=1916)
94 855 turbo Wagon (sold in 09)
85 535i-5 (sold in 07)
76 300D (sold in 92)
83 944 (sold in 86)
I apparently only buy cars designated by numbers
Regards,
doug
Waterloo, Ontario Canada, eh
86 951 (http://www.pcaucr.org/index.php/visu...egory&catid=61)
01 E320 (W210) 4matic Wagon (http://www.benzworld.org/forums/w210...body-do-2.html)
00 540i-6 (http:// http://www.trillium-bmwclub.ca/forum...sp?postid=1916)
94 855 turbo Wagon (sold in 09)
85 535i-5 (sold in 07)
76 300D (sold in 92)
83 944 (sold in 86)
I apparently only buy cars designated by numbers
#45
Lets also not forget that the 944 traced its roots back to the 1976 924.. which had been in development since what, 1972? So.. here it was, 20+ years later (1995). i think the car had a good run.
Also recall that Porsche in the early 1990s was nearly BOUGHT up. They fought hard.. they brought in Toyota folks (just in time production experts etc) to revolutionize how Porsche was doing business.
It was reported that, when the Toyota guys got a tour they said "where is the factory.. all we see are warehouses".. because Porsche was not lean.. and therefore in trouble.
While the 924/44/68 helped porsche, the time was simply over for the design. Time for something "new" like a redone 914 (ie boxster).. and sharing parts with the 911 replacement made BOTH ventures economically feasible.
While Weidiking (sp) may have gone mad at the end (trying to buy VW) he DID redo how Porsche as a manufacturer does its business.
Also recall that Porsche in the early 1990s was nearly BOUGHT up. They fought hard.. they brought in Toyota folks (just in time production experts etc) to revolutionize how Porsche was doing business.
It was reported that, when the Toyota guys got a tour they said "where is the factory.. all we see are warehouses".. because Porsche was not lean.. and therefore in trouble.
While the 924/44/68 helped porsche, the time was simply over for the design. Time for something "new" like a redone 914 (ie boxster).. and sharing parts with the 911 replacement made BOTH ventures economically feasible.
While Weidiking (sp) may have gone mad at the end (trying to buy VW) he DID redo how Porsche as a manufacturer does its business.