Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Injectors and fuel economy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-04-2010, 06:36 PM
  #1  
zogster
Pro
Thread Starter
 
zogster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Default Injectors and fuel economy

Hey dudes,

My 1987 951 has been giving pretty poor fuel economy lately - around 15mpg even when I'm taking it easy, in mixed but mostly urban driving.

So I thought I'd have the injectors cleaned as a first step in trying to improve matters. I have the injectors back in place now, but I'm just wondering if anyone can tell me, from the attached results, whether they were dirty enough to have been mostly responsible for the problem. (The only thing the pic misses is the stat for "injector imbalance": 0.53% after cleaning, 2.27% before).

Now, I know the obvious answer is "why not just put a few more miles on her and see what mileage you get", but I'm in the middle of fixing a couple of power steering issues and don't want to hit the road until they're done also. But while I'm tinkering I'd like to know if it's worth looking into any other possible causes of the poor economy. (It's a UK vehicle which does not, I think, have the O2 sensor often referred to in this context.)

I sent the injectors to injectortune.co.uk, who charged very little and sent 'em back within two days - thoroughly recommended.

Last edited by zogster; 04-17-2012 at 07:27 PM.
Old 03-04-2010, 06:39 PM
  #2  
zogster
Pro
Thread Starter
 
zogster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Hmmm... don't know why the pic's gone sideways on me. I swear it was the right way up when I uploaded it.
Old 03-04-2010, 06:44 PM
  #3  
luftpirate
Pro
 
luftpirate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Interwebs
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Old 03-04-2010, 06:48 PM
  #4  
zogster
Pro
Thread Starter
 
zogster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Ta-daa!! Thanks Luft
Old 03-04-2010, 08:17 PM
  #5  
944Ross
Rennlist Member
 
944Ross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NM (ABQ)
Posts: 2,238
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

The real benefit from cleaning is likely the spray pattern, not just the volume at a specific pressure. The data in the charts indicates mild plugging, likely from the screen in the injectors, not tip fouling.

You surely have an O2 sensor.
Old 03-05-2010, 03:48 AM
  #6  
Mark944na86
Rennlist Member
 
Mark944na86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia (Formerly: Sunnyvale, CA)
Posts: 2,120
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 944Ross
You surely have an O2 sensor.
+1. That would be the first thing I'd try.

I was amazed when I replaced one on a Honda led to a 33% increase in mpg efficiency (no kidding: 17mpg -> 23mpg).
Old 03-06-2010, 02:50 PM
  #7  
zogster
Pro
Thread Starter
 
zogster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Thanks all - I'll just have to look a bit harder for the damn thing next time!

Just waiting for PS pump seals to arrive and then I'll be back under the car for a little more light tinkering...
Old 03-06-2010, 07:22 PM
  #8  
FortyFourS2
6th Gear
 
FortyFourS2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm not sure that he has a Lambda sensor to be honest being a UK car. Best to ring up RPM and ask thm if the 80s 951s came with them. I know my S2 doesn't have a cat from the factory either (but UK cars from 1990 onwards did get a cat).
Old 03-06-2010, 09:20 PM
  #9  
944Ross
Rennlist Member
 
944Ross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NM (ABQ)
Posts: 2,238
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I can't believe it, the O2 sensor appears to be US-only even on turbos?! I looked it up in the FSM, and right next to the O2 sensor on the wiring diagram, it says "US Only".
Old 03-07-2010, 09:00 AM
  #10  
zogster
Pro
Thread Starter
 
zogster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Ah... so on the bright side, I don't have to feel so bad about not finding it before, plus it's one less thing to check.

On the down side, I guess the remaining likely causes of gas-guzzling are less easily rectified than replacing the O2 sensor.
Old 03-07-2010, 09:04 AM
  #11  
Mark944na86
Rennlist Member
 
Mark944na86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia (Formerly: Sunnyvale, CA)
Posts: 2,120
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Well, my S2 is definitely not an US car, and it definitely has an O2 sensor!

Check your exhaust pipe near the front just after the connection to the exhaust flanges.
Old 03-07-2010, 11:16 AM
  #12  
944Ross
Rennlist Member
 
944Ross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NM (ABQ)
Posts: 2,238
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mark944na86
Well, my S2 is definitely not an US car, and it definitely has an O2 sensor!

Check your exhaust pipe near the front just after the connection to the exhaust flanges.
His car is an 87 951, that's what I looked up. I'm sure by S2 days, emissions regs had tightened enough worldwide that O2 sensors were used.
Old 03-07-2010, 11:46 AM
  #13  
zogster
Pro
Thread Starter
 
zogster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I believe all S2s, regardless of market, had catalytic converters, which mine does not, so I think "no O2 sensors for this UK model" sounds right. In any case I'm definitely under the car again tomorrow (bit too windy today) so I can check for sure.
Old 04-05-2010, 03:11 PM
  #14  
zogster
Pro
Thread Starter
 
zogster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

So... it actually took me a bit longer than I'd planned to finish fixing (rather than bodging) the power steering, but my baby's back on the road in proper working order again.

And I can report that:
• I definitely have no O2 sensor - where I think it would be fitted there's some kind of brass delete plug/bolt/thing-that-fills-a-hole. Looks factory rather than a previous owner mod, so far as I can tell the difference.
• After the injector cleaning (and with a new fuel filter) I'm getting around 17mpg, though that's almost all been city driving - plenty of traffic, speed bumps, etc.

So I think my mileage is better, but I really need a decent road trip to get a proper idea. And if things still look poor after a few motorway miles, then I should check out the AFM?

[and btw, power steering... pffft. I don't mind getting cold, wet and greasy to fix something that I need, but a power sapping luxury like that... ]
Old 04-05-2010, 07:18 PM
  #15  
Luis de Prat
Rennlist Member
 
Luis de Prat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 9,714
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I would leave the AFM alone for now and try replacing the fuel filter and the fuel pressure regulator, first.

When I replaced these on my old 83, the fuel economy improved significantly. Keep in mind that the FPR fails in 'open' mode, meaning it's designed to let the engine run richer as it goes bad over time. Recently replaced both on my S2 and 951 as well.

Good luck with it.


Quick Reply: Injectors and fuel economy



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:02 AM.