Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

ls1 engine swap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-20-2009, 02:54 AM
  #241  
944J
Banned
 
944J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket_aka944
there's the reasoning right there...

if your 500WHP turbo blows up...its coming outta your pocket...
why would it blow up any more than an lsx with nitrous?
Old 02-20-2009, 03:06 AM
  #242  
Olli Snellman
Race Car
 
Olli Snellman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 4,479
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

You are right in saying that most cars, including Porsche, are made of parts from various vendors. This has nearly always been the case, every manufacturer and every model, probably Ferrari are the exception. Most of the parts in our cars are from European manufacturers, however all 944's have a Japanese Nippondeso climate fan assembly fitted - eat rice you purists!
I suppose it's not just european manufacturers who use parts from various vendors, it's the same think with japanese and american manufacturers as well.

Ferrari use also parts from other vendors like Bosch, Magneti Marelli, Brembo, Speedline etc.etc. just check out older Ferrari's they use parts from Fiat, like winshield wiper and blinker switches. It's like first gen 944 used quite many VW parts. And those Nippondenso A/C parts can be found also from 911 &928 models, not just 944's. Also new 911 use japanese parts like Aisin transmission in several models.

I do not have anything against these engine swaps, i just think GM V8 is not that innovative engine to use. Also my country's law is against this, we are not allowed to increase engine disaplacement more than 25%, so GM swaps are out of question.
Old 02-20-2009, 03:08 AM
  #243  
Lorax
The Impaler
Rennlist Member
 
Lorax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 13,696
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I understand why people do it, but then again.. I don't.

Everybody and their mother has some kind of lsX in their RX/240/944. Nothing new or interesting about it, and those motors have been built a bajillion times in a bajillion different ways already. I guess it doesn't fulfill my need to tinker and push the limits. The idea is just rather... boring.


I want to put a cayenne v6 in the car. That would be a cool swap with lots of potential. You would have to partially tube frame the front end.
Old 02-20-2009, 03:20 AM
  #244  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,594
Received 663 Likes on 516 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 944J
why would it blow up any more than an lsx with nitrous?
too much boost pressure and inadequate fueling (it can happen even in the best setups) will detonate, destroy pistons and valves, blow head gaskets, blow piston rings, snap rods, shear crankshafts......

the same can go for nitrous though as well...
Old 02-20-2009, 03:24 AM
  #245  
Lorax
The Impaler
Rennlist Member
 
Lorax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 13,696
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket_aka944
too much boost pressure and inadequate fueling (it can happen even in the best setups) will detonate, destroy pistons and valves, blow head gaskets, blow piston rings, snap rods, shear crankshafts......

the same can go for nitrous though as well...
If you have proper failsafe devices it is difficult to do.

I would have to try really hard to overboost and destroy my motor... really hard.

Then again 951's mysteriously spin rod bearings without explanation.
Old 02-20-2009, 03:44 AM
  #246  
944J
Banned
 
944J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lorax
If you have proper failsafe devices it is difficult to do.

I would have to try really hard to overboost and destroy my motor... really hard.

Then again 951's mysteriously spin rod bearings without explanation.
isnt that because of the oil problem?

it seems like all the reasons are known for blown up 915's so what's the problem? use more fuel

i think that at 400-500hp the 951 is the engine to use

if you want 600 or more then the lsx is cheaper
Old 02-20-2009, 03:45 AM
  #247  
944J
Banned
 
944J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket_aka944
too much boost pressure and inadequate fueling (it can happen even in the best setups) will detonate, destroy pistons and valves, blow head gaskets, blow piston rings, snap rods, shear crankshafts......

the same can go for nitrous though as well...
use more fuel if you have inadequate fuelling, $200 fix, problem solved, next...
Old 02-20-2009, 03:50 AM
  #248  
Lorax
The Impaler
Rennlist Member
 
Lorax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 13,696
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 944J
use more fuel if you have inadequate fuelling, $200 fix, problem solved, next...
He's talking about AFR. Sometimes crazy stuff happens. At 500rwhp a 944 motor is much closer to the limit than a lsX. A small lean condition can equal big problems.
Old 02-20-2009, 03:54 AM
  #249  
Lorax
The Impaler
Rennlist Member
 
Lorax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 13,696
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 944J
isnt that because of the oil problem?

You could have a custom crankshaft made (Which costs thousands)

You can try perp drilling the crank, although some argue that this only makes it worse, especially if the drilled holes are too large.

You could go dry sump, which is a large amount of work, and an even larger amount of money.

Personally I have wound up changing rod bearings about every 20k miles so it hasn't been an issue for me.

Last edited by Lorax; 02-20-2009 at 04:15 AM.
Old 02-20-2009, 03:54 AM
  #250  
944J
Banned
 
944J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lorax
He's talking about AFR. Sometimes crazy stuff happens. At 500rwhp a 944 motor is much closer to the limit than a lsX.

yeah i agree, but whats the cost difference?

i think i'll be doing an lsx engine but want to know the cost difference for home built engines 951 3.0 vs lsx
Old 02-20-2009, 04:01 AM
  #251  
Lorax
The Impaler
Rennlist Member
 
Lorax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 13,696
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 944J
yeah i agree, but whats the cost difference?

i think i'll be doing an lsx engine but want to know the cost difference for home built engines 951 3.0 vs lsx
I think the cost to do a really bulletproof 3.0L would be about the same, that's just my opinion.

If I were going to build a 3.0L 500rwhp reliable motor it would look like this

whole 968 motor in excellent shape - 2000

Dry sleeving - 2000

custom rods - 1200

custom pistons - 1200

crank work - 600

custom turbo/ exhaust 3000

custom cams and head work - 2500

Some kind of EMS - 2000

clutch etc - 1000

FMIC - 500

custom oil cooler - 500



and that's before all the miscellaneous costs that would be incurred.
Old 02-20-2009, 04:17 AM
  #252  
944J
Banned
 
944J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

sounds like an lsx crate engine can be more plug and play, less searching for parts, etc.
Old 02-20-2009, 04:23 AM
  #253  
Lorax
The Impaler
Rennlist Member
 
Lorax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 13,696
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 944J
sounds like an lsx crate engine can be more plug and play, less searching for parts, etc.
If that's what you are into. You will also just have the same boring old crate motor as a billion other folks with all sorts of different cars.

Really just depends on what you are looking for.

If you build a 3.0L to 500whp.. that's impressive.

building an lsX to 500whp is well.... forgettable.

Sure as hell would be fun though.

I guess the only solution is to have both.
Old 02-20-2009, 12:39 PM
  #254  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,594
Received 663 Likes on 516 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lorax
He's talking about AFR. Sometimes crazy stuff happens. At 500rwhp a 944 motor is much closer to the limit than a lsX. A small lean condition can equal big problems.
it only takes a second of improper AFR to destroy everything...

another thing, in order to get that high of HP youll need a bigass turbo, which will take a while to spool up...and suddenly at 4500+RPM when it spins up all the air starts rushing in, and suddenly your DME fries lol and you get like a drop of fuel when you really need 50x more you go kabloooommm

doesnt seem likely but it happens...
Old 02-20-2009, 10:04 PM
  #255  
944J
Banned
 
944J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

is this a good engine?

ls2 5.3l with only 53/k miles comes complete from oil pan to intake and all acc drive, uncut harness and ecm
what's a good price for it?


Quick Reply: ls1 engine swap



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:34 AM.