Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Why do S2000's keep racing me? (or what should I replace my 951 with?)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-26-2007, 11:01 PM
  #91  
DDP
Rocket Scientist
Rennlist Member
 
DDP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket_aka944
well when you throw a few corners in we know who wins that...


Not true.

First off. Let me be the first to tell everyone here on rennlist something important. The 951 (S or not) isn't the best looking, fastest, best handling, newest, coolest car on the road. Sorry. Get over it.
Old 10-26-2007, 11:16 PM
  #92  
82-T/A
Racer
 
82-T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DDP
Not true.

First off. Let me be the first to tell everyone here on rennlist something important. The 951 (S or not) isn't the best looking, fastest, best handling, newest, coolest car on the road. Sorry. Get over it.
There are MANY MANY cool cars out there. I like MANY different cars and am not particular to any one brand (as you can see from my list below)...

But the S2000, at least to me, is no where near the status of a Porsche 944 Turbo. As far as I'm concerned, it's a slightly quicker Mazda Miata.


Todd,
2006 Pontiac Solstice
2004 VW Beetle Convertible (Wife's)
2002 Ford Crown Victoria LX-P74
1987 Pontiac Fiero SE / V6 (3.2)
1984 Porsche 944
1981 Pontiac Trans Am WS6 (Olds 455)
1973 Volkswagen Type-2 Transporter (1800cc)
Old 10-26-2007, 11:19 PM
  #93  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,574
Received 654 Likes on 508 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DDP
Not true.

First off. Let me be the first to tell everyone here on rennlist something important. The 951 (S or not) isn't the best looking, fastest, best handling, newest, coolest car on the road. Sorry. Get over it.
That's true, my bad.

the NA is.
Old 10-27-2007, 12:01 AM
  #94  
DDP
Rocket Scientist
Rennlist Member
 
DDP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket_aka944
That's true, my bad.

the NA is.
lol. Agreed. The 83 NA to be exact.

I don't mean to keep making it seem like my posts are directed at you, I just end up quoting you. Then making a point after I quote you. haha
Old 10-27-2007, 12:22 AM
  #95  
Reimu
Drifting
 
Reimu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NC Triad
Posts: 2,599
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'm not quite fond of the S2000 period... It's a car that does what it was made to do I suppose, but I can't see myself spending money to buy one.
Old 10-27-2007, 12:56 AM
  #96  
teamking
Pro
 
teamking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by njim3
Cars& Drivers and other magazins that i have read clamed that the S2000 is capable for 0-60 time is 6.2 ...
Jim
Car and Driver reports 0-60 in 5.5:
http://www.caranddriver.com/comparis...nda-s2000.html
Old 10-27-2007, 01:04 AM
  #97  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,574
Received 654 Likes on 508 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DDP
lol. Agreed. The 83 NA to be exact.

I don't mean to keep making it seem like my posts are directed at you, I just end up quoting you. Then making a point after I quote you. haha
The brown ones are actually the best-looking, regardless of year.
Old 10-27-2007, 01:04 AM
  #98  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,574
Received 654 Likes on 508 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CameronKame
I'm not quite fond of the S2000 period... It's a car that does what it was made to do I suppose, but I can't see myself spending money to buy one.
would you like it if you stole one?
Old 10-27-2007, 01:11 AM
  #99  
teamking
Pro
 
teamking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Teamking
Look, top speed is proportional to the cube-root of HORSEPOWER. ..
Originally Posted by Fishey
...how is hp to the 1/3 power have anything to do with topspeed. Thats basicly stating that HP is proportional to topspeed (A true statement). Now, I agree with "power under the curve" but the 951 has more under the curve. Its one of the reasons the top speed of the 951S is like 10mph higher then a S2000.
From wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerodynamic_drag

Note that the power needed to push an object through a fluid increases as the cube of the velocity. A car cruising on a highway at 50 mph (80 km/h) may require only 10 horsepower (7.5 kW) to overcome air drag, but that same car at 100 mph (160 km/h) requires 80 hp (60 kW). With a doubling of speed the drag (force) quadruples per the formula. Exerting four times the force over a fixed distance produces four times as much work. At twice the speed the work (resulting in displacement over a fixed distance) is done twice as fast. Since power is the rate of doing work, four times the work done in half the time requires eight times the power.
Old 10-27-2007, 01:11 AM
  #100  
Yummybud924
Drifting
 
Yummybud924's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vancouver,BC
Posts: 2,854
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

s2000 is a lame car imo. don't like the looks. it may be quick but it's a 4 banger and it's a honda.

for that kind of money there are a lot of other cars I'd like more.

honda s2000 would be nice ona track but daily driving when are you going to be reving it to 9000 rpm to get the power lol.
Old 10-27-2007, 01:30 AM
  #101  
fezz
Burning Brakes
 
fezz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

just last weekend I ran with my Charlotte p-car buds on a NC mountain fun run. 951's, 944's, S2's and a twin turbo 300Z - we ran hard and ALL the cars were awesome. Afterwards, I was even more impressed with the S2k.

Say what you want or what you think. I really dont want to go on about Honda on this board - But, anyone who owns this car loves how pure the concept is and the commitment Honda made to squeeze eveything it could out of it. Doing more with less - I think that is the Porsche way, or the way it once was.

I like several cars. They dont always serve the same purpose. The S2k is balanced, planted and cuts a corner like a razor. The six-speed gearbox is quite possibly the best in the world and the motor is simply brilliant. Hey, it looks pretty too.

We're all Porsche guys and we like how things sound - download you one of them videos on YouTube of an S2k on the track and listen to that motor. They all sound like that - right out of the box. It's beautiful I tell you.
Old 10-27-2007, 01:31 AM
  #102  
teamking
Pro
 
teamking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by teamking
Look, top speed is proportional to the cube-root of HORSEPOWER. If it's a diesel making 240 HP (because it makes 480 ft lbs at 2600) or an F20C making 240 HP (because it makes 160 ft lbs at 7800 (I'm just using rough numbers for this example)), it doesn't matter. Top speed will be the same, assuming that both engines are properly geared.

What matters during acceleration is area under HORSEPOWER curve. Since it has low HORSEPOWER at low RPM's, the S2000 is slow under a rolling start condition. Of course, this problem is eliminated in a standing start by doing a high RPM clutch drop (I use 5K to 6K, depending on conditions).
Originally Posted by Fishey
Thats the worst example ever...
Fishey, why don't you do us all a favor... read more and type less.

I suggest you start with this:
http://craig.backfire.ca/pages/autos/horsepower

Conclusion
In order to quickly accelerate a vehicle, the engine must be able to make a large force at the speed that the vehicle is traveling. The amount of power determines the force that the engine can create at a given speed, whether it is a very low speed or a very high speed. It does not matter if the engine makes power by revving high or making a lot of torque, because drivetrain gearing can be used to adjust the torque and revs proportionally.

The vehicle with the largest average acceleration is the one that has the largest average force going to the pavement through a wide range of speeds.

" Peak power sells cars. High average power wins races. "
Old 10-27-2007, 01:37 AM
  #103  
teamking
Pro
 
teamking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Yummybud924
honda s2000 would be nice ona track but daily driving when are you going to be reving it to 9000 rpm to get the power lol.
That's kinda like saying to a 951 owner, "but daily driving when are you going to hit boost to get the power lol." Unless it's raining or something else is going on, I generally hit 8K at least once every time I drive the car. It's positively addicting.

I was told that one of the tests of the F20C engine prior to production was running it at 10,000 RPM for 24 hours; they tore it down afterward and found no ill effects.
Old 10-27-2007, 01:39 AM
  #104  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,574
Received 654 Likes on 508 Posts
Default

i read once that the head can spin to 12000RPM without damage...

maybe its time to "miss" a shift and put it into 3rd instead of 5th lol
Old 10-27-2007, 01:57 AM
  #105  
teamking
Pro
 
teamking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket_aka944
i read once that the head can spin to 12000RPM without damage...

maybe its time to "miss" a shift and put it into 3rd instead of 5th lol
I don't know... I've heard that referred to as the "money shift"!


Quick Reply: Why do S2000's keep racing me? (or what should I replace my 951 with?)



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:24 AM.