Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

If you're running a squared setup, what width did you go with and how do you like it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-21-2022, 07:50 PM
  #1  
AkechiMotors
Racer
Thread Starter
 
AkechiMotors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 341
Received 22 Likes on 15 Posts
Default If you're running a squared setup, what width did you go with and how do you like it?

I've read many claims that a squared setup (all four rims/tires are equal width) results in better dynamics by addressing the car's tendency to push during aggressive cornering. If you've made the switch, what size are you running and do you think it has introduced any beneficial oversteer compared to stock?
Old 11-21-2022, 09:12 PM
  #2  
walfreyydo
Three Wheelin'
 
walfreyydo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Southern WI - 89S2 Megasquirt PNP
Posts: 1,279
Received 286 Likes on 249 Posts
Default

My setup, which I just posted in another thread are early offset (~23et) 8s in the rear, late offset (~52et) 8s in the front (car is an 89 S2). I am running stock sway bars F/R and 400lb front/650lb rear springs (coilovers with rear TB delete). This setup was inspired by Tim Comeau from his Porsche 944RS video and I can say that this setup feels great.

On the autox course, the car rotates well and feels very neutral balanced, especially in tighter hairpin turns where you are braking hard on the approach. In more sweeping corners, the rear end has a tendency to want to come out when accelerating out of corners but still easy to correct and "hold" it on the edge to keep it from sliding too much. I find it extremely fun to drive with this setup. Prior to this I was running 8" square late offset D90 setup which behaved similarly, so a square late offset setup should also work well.

Compared to when I was running 7s in the front, the car pushed quite bad. Changing up the rear spring rates helped a bit as well. I experimented with 300/500 lb springs, but ultimately was happier with a stiffer 400/650 pairing (in the video Tim is running 350/500 I believe). Regardless of the spring rates I do think 8" front wheels made the largest impact on removing understeer. As others have noted, its believed Porsche put 7" fronts as a safety feature to force understeer, and that running 8s, even on a factory car, is really key to unlocking more potential out of the car.

So yes, I think in terms of performance handling on these cars on track or autox, a square setup works best. I cant say that I notice any difference on the street, since I never push the car hard enough to notice.

Link to Tim's video (thanks Tim):

Last edited by walfreyydo; 11-21-2022 at 09:47 PM.
The following users liked this post:
AkechiMotors (11-21-2022)
Old 11-21-2022, 10:10 PM
  #3  
AkechiMotors
Racer
Thread Starter
 
AkechiMotors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 341
Received 22 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by walfreyydo
My setup, which I just posted in another thread are early offset (~23et) 8s in the rear, late offset (~52et) 8s in the front (car is an 89 S2). I am running stock sway bars F/R and 400lb front/650lb rear springs (coilovers with rear TB delete). This setup was inspired by Tim Comeau from his Porsche 944RS video and I can say that this setup feels great.

On the autox course, the car rotates well and feels very neutral balanced, especially in tighter hairpin turns where you are braking hard on the approach. In more sweeping corners, the rear end has a tendency to want to come out when accelerating out of corners but still easy to correct and "hold" it on the edge to keep it from sliding too much. I find it extremely fun to drive with this setup. Prior to this I was running 8" square late offset D90 setup which behaved similarly, so a square late offset setup should also work well.

Compared to when I was running 7s in the front, the car pushed quite bad. Changing up the rear spring rates helped a bit as well. I experimented with 300/500 lb springs, but ultimately was happier with a stiffer 400/650 pairing (in the video Tim is running 350/500 I believe). Regardless of the spring rates I do think 8" front wheels made the largest impact on removing understeer. As others have noted, its believed Porsche put 7" fronts as a safety feature to force understeer, and that running 8s, even on a factory car, is really key to unlocking more potential out of the car.

So yes, I think in terms of performance handling on these cars on track or autox, a square setup works best. I cant say that I notice any difference on the street, since I never push the car hard enough to notice.

Link to Tim's video (thanks Tim):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7UG3kQPtk4
Great info - many thanks! And great video - I hadn't seen that, and I've actually been to Tim's shop (nice guy, and his shop does really good work). Why did you move to the mixed et's (23/52) from the square et's (52's all around)?

I have an S2 as well, and was thinking of 8's; I guess the alternative could be 7's all around, but as you point out, it's believed 7's up front is what makes the car push so much.
Old 11-22-2022, 08:39 AM
  #4  
Dan Shea
Pro
 
Dan Shea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 652
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

I run square 9". It sticks like glue, but the downside is it tramlines a lot.
The following users liked this post:
AkechiMotors (11-22-2022)
Old 11-22-2022, 08:53 AM
  #5  
924RACR
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
924RACR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 3,988
Received 83 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Absolutely square; it's appropriate to the weight balance of the car. On our full-race 924, we're actually only a touch rear-heavy, maybe 2%. Countless other changes from stock (springs, bars, dampers and bushings), but we run 225/45-15 or, these days, for cost, Spec Miata takeoffs at 205/55015 - we're limited to a 6" rim in ITB.

I wouldn't be real excited about a non-square setup on a 944 unless it's pushing a substantial amount of power, like 300+...
The following users liked this post:
AkechiMotors (11-22-2022)
Old 11-22-2022, 09:45 AM
  #6  
T&T Racing
Drifting
 
T&T Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: New York & Indiana
Posts: 2,883
Received 347 Likes on 274 Posts
Default

After many attempts at trying to get my 944 NA to rotate with 7" front wheels and 8" rear wheels, it was a failure, just understeer.
My setup is all square 8x15 wheels, 400 lb/in front springs and 31 mm hollow rear TB. Front anti-roll bar is 25.4 mm MO30 and rear anti-roll bar is 19 mm 3 point adjustable. All connections are rigid except the drop link for the front sway bar.

The front wheels have a 1" section added so the foot print is wider and the rear wheels are Fuchs.

It is amazing with fantastic rotation in slow corners. My shocks are ANZE, aka Penske, double adjustable w/o remote reservoirs.

Last edited by T&T Racing; 11-22-2022 at 09:48 AM.
The following users liked this post:
AkechiMotors (11-22-2022)
Old 11-22-2022, 10:14 AM
  #7  
secondchris
Instructor
 
secondchris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by walfreyydo
My setup, which I just posted in another thread are early offset (~23et) 8s in the rear, late offset (~52et) 8s in the front (car is an 89 S2). I am running stock sway bars F/R and 400lb front/650lb rear springs (coilovers with rear TB delete). This setup was inspired by Tim Comeau from his Porsche 944RS video and I can say that this setup feels great.

On the autox course, the car rotates well and feels very neutral balanced, especially in tighter hairpin turns where you are braking hard on the approach. In more sweeping corners, the rear end has a tendency to want to come out when accelerating out of corners but still easy to correct and "hold" it on the edge to keep it from sliding too much. I find it extremely fun to drive with this setup. Prior to this I was running 8" square late offset D90 setup which behaved similarly, so a square late offset setup should also work well.

Compared to when I was running 7s in the front, the car pushed quite bad. Changing up the rear spring rates helped a bit as well. I experimented with 300/500 lb springs, but ultimately was happier with a stiffer 400/650 pairing (in the video Tim is running 350/500 I believe). Regardless of the spring rates I do think 8" front wheels made the largest impact on removing understeer. As others have noted, its believed Porsche put 7" fronts as a safety feature to force understeer, and that running 8s, even on a factory car, is really key to unlocking more potential out of the car.

So yes, I think in terms of performance handling on these cars on track or autox, a square setup works best. I cant say that I notice any difference on the street, since I never push the car hard enough to notice.

Link to Tim's video (thanks Tim):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7UG3kQPtk4
I thought the early offset 8" wheels were Fuchs with 10.6 offset.
Old 11-22-2022, 01:36 PM
  #8  
Braymond
Rennlist Member
 
Braymond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

I'm surprised there hasn't been more discussion about tire size vs wheel size in this thread.

When you guys say above that 8" square all around made a big difference in reducing understeer and improving rotation, can I assume that moving up from 7" front to 8" front also meant wider tires in the front (to match the rear)?

Do you think you could run 225/50s square tires on 7" front and 8" rear wheels and get similar results?

-Bill
Old 11-22-2022, 03:17 PM
  #9  
walfreyydo
Three Wheelin'
 
walfreyydo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Southern WI - 89S2 Megasquirt PNP
Posts: 1,279
Received 286 Likes on 249 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by secondchris
I thought the early offset 8" wheels were Fuchs with 10.6 offset.
all early offset 944 wheels are 23.3 et.

10.6et 8” are likely 911 rears (im not a 911 guy so unsure).
Old 11-22-2022, 03:20 PM
  #10  
walfreyydo
Three Wheelin'
 
walfreyydo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Southern WI - 89S2 Megasquirt PNP
Posts: 1,279
Received 286 Likes on 249 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Braymond

Do you think you could run 225/50s square tires on 7" front and 8" rear wheels and get similar results?

-Bill
Possibly but with wider tires on the same size rim the sidewall will roll over more, whereas the wider rim will provide more reinforcement for that wider tire contact patch. I would say best results would cone from pairing the wider tire with the wider wheel.
Old 11-22-2022, 03:25 PM
  #11  
walfreyydo
Three Wheelin'
 
walfreyydo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Southern WI - 89S2 Megasquirt PNP
Posts: 1,279
Received 286 Likes on 249 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AkechiMotors
Why did you move to the mixed et's (23/52) from the square et's (52's all around)?
Two reasons. First is the lower (late) rear offset should help the rear end rotate more by increasing rear track width greater than the front. Secondly, I prefer the deep dish look of the early offset wheels and with the amount of negative camber I am running they fit perfectly.

Running a square 7” setup will decrease the cars handling, but if thats not a concern it should be fine (might look goofy because they are so skinny).

I definitely recommend 8s all around on these cars if you are looking to stay with oem wheels


Last edited by walfreyydo; 11-22-2022 at 03:29 PM.
The following users liked this post:
AkechiMotors (11-22-2022)
Old 11-22-2022, 06:03 PM
  #12  
968to986
Racer
 
968to986's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 476
Received 69 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

For autocross/track use, I run 17x8.5 Boxster rear wheels (+52 offset) at all four corners with 255/40. Very balanced handling and grip, but heavier input is needed at the front and tramlines with the negative camber. For street, I run 17x8.5 ESM 004 (+35 offset) with 225/45 and 245/40. Still balanced but lighter feeling and more noticeable slip angle from front and rear, so to me, more fun on twisty roads.
The following users liked this post:
AkechiMotors (11-22-2022)
Old 11-22-2022, 06:36 PM
  #13  
jhowell371
Burning Brakes
 
jhowell371's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,100
Received 54 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

I'm running 8 inch 968 wheels with 225x16 all around.
The following users liked this post:
AkechiMotors (11-22-2022)
Old 11-22-2022, 07:26 PM
  #14  
secondchris
Instructor
 
secondchris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by walfreyydo
all early offset 944 wheels are 23.3 et.

10.6et 8” are likely 911 rears (im not a 911 guy so unsure).
Those Fuchs have a 911 part number but were repurposed for use on the rear of early 944 with a staggered set up, paired with 7" up front.

So just generally wondering what wheel is being used that is 8x15".
Old 11-23-2022, 05:27 PM
  #15  
944Fest (aka Dan P)
Unaffiliated
 
944Fest (aka Dan P)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 5,285
Received 209 Likes on 135 Posts
Default




I don't know if this will help but I thought it was a cool summary of factory wheels made in our era and what they fit.
The following 2 users liked this post by 944Fest (aka Dan P):
AkechiMotors (11-23-2022), Dan Shea (11-29-2022)


Quick Reply: If you're running a squared setup, what width did you go with and how do you like it?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:11 AM.