Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Correcting Porsche's Ground design...am I nuts or on the right track?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-2018, 03:55 PM
  #1  
Kilohertz
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
Kilohertz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Slightly left of Vernon, BC
Posts: 74
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Correcting Porsche's Ground design...am I nuts or on the right track?

As I delve into my first 944 restoration, I am faced with a no start, and a lot of wiring issues, corroded fuses and fuse blocks, rusty relays and so on. I have managed to get the car to turn over now, but am having all sorts of weird things happening, like the battery light is on without the key in the ignition, about 230mA of constant drain on the battery, poor connections on the multiple battery cable connecting points etc.

So I am thinking of simplifying this, being an electronics guy, I am used to having a central ground system, sometimes referred to as "star ground", where everything that needs a ground stems from a central point. The 944's, for reasons I don't understand, grounds from the battery to the frame, relies on the frame to make continuity to another ground block on the firewall, then from there to the engine and so on, many places for corrosion and loss of continuity and voltage drops. I am thinking of running the main battery ground straight from the battery to the engine block, like every other car I have ever owned, and then ensure the block to firewall is perfect and clean of corrosion. Running the starter current thru the frame and multiple studs doesn't make sense to me. The DME and it's sensors all rely on good grounds to have clean stable signals so the better the ground reference, the less potential for noise and extraneous signals to cause problems.

Am I on the right track? Anyone else tried this? Anyone know why Porsche grounded the system the way they did, that could explain it to me?

Cheers
Old 04-07-2018, 04:54 PM
  #2  
marc abrams
Burning Brakes
 
marc abrams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,137
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Yea, but every car you ever had probably didn't have a battery mounted in the cowl either. Honesty I don't see a problem with it.
Old 04-07-2018, 06:40 PM
  #3  
mrgreenjeans
Three Wheelin'
 
mrgreenjeans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Marco Island , FL --- Red River Valley, midwest
Posts: 1,398
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

I am limited in knowledge in all things electrical , but do know this:
Water cooled Porsches such as our 944s, suffer from 'stray voltage' and it is common for it to affect the coolant in the water jacket, promoting galvanic corrosion.

One of the reasons Porsche recommends coolant change as often as they do.

Doubt me ? Put a probe in the reservoir and take a reading ...... Or, take off the heater core and check for AL flaking collecting inside from the engine passages eroding.

There is a huge amount of redundancy within the layout of Porsche current flow and many folks have found this out seeking to delete wiring while stripping their cars for track duty.

And again, remember the '82-'83 cars differ in wiring from their '84 - '85.1 brothers, and again from '85.2 and up, using a quite primitive fuse block. A lot of power runs thru the headlight switch and failure of this switch has burned many a car to the ground; maybe even more than the fuel line fires on the second series cars due to routing by the manifold.
Old 04-07-2018, 08:18 PM
  #4  
Kilohertz
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
Kilohertz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Slightly left of Vernon, BC
Posts: 74
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mrgreenjeans
I am limited in knowledge in all things electrical , but do know this:
Water cooled Porsches such as our 944s, suffer from 'stray voltage' and it is common for it to affect the coolant in the water jacket, promoting galvanic corrosion.
One of the reasons Porsche recommends coolant change as often as they do.
Doubt me ? Put a probe in the reservoir and take a reading ...... Or, take off the heater core and check for AL flaking collecting inside from the engine passages eroding.

And again, remember the '82-'83 cars differ in wiring from their '84 - '85.1 brothers, and again from '85.2 and up, using a quite primitive fuse block. A lot of power runs thru the headlight switch and failure of this switch has burned many a car to the ground; maybe even more than the fuel line fires on the second series cars due to routing by the manifold.
Good to know. I use a special coolant additive in my F-550 to keep the corrosion at bay, might be worth looking into for this application. It's a Ford product.

Yes, the fuses, I made a comment in my first thread about this car, wondering why WWII era fuses were still being used in the 80's. I have cleaned all of the fuse holders, and the fuses, and the relays, and everything else that is under there. Grounds are next on my list. I'm going to run a #1 or 2 cable from the battery, thru the drain port over to the engine block, directly. All new ends on the 3 or 4 12V feeds to the harness, clean all grounds that I can find...then try to start it. Lots to do, thankfully I enjoy this sort of work, it's a hobby for me.

Cheers
Old 04-08-2018, 11:26 AM
  #5  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,576
Received 655 Likes on 508 Posts
Default

theres a big honkin ground cable from block to frame dead center behind engine.
and about 8-12" to the passenger side is where the battery ground to chassis cable goes.
you could run a splice to join them...

but remember, the body may be 1/16" steel but it's 5 feet wide which gives more conductor area than almost all AWG wire sizes.
so there's plenty of current flow despite the resistance of the steel vs copper.
Old 04-08-2018, 11:42 AM
  #6  
Kilohertz
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
Kilohertz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Slightly left of Vernon, BC
Posts: 74
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket
theres a big honkin ground cable from block to frame dead center behind engine.
and about 8-12" to the passenger side is where the battery ground to chassis cable goes.
you could run a splice to join them...

but remember, the body may be 1/16" steel but it's 5 feet wide which gives more conductor area than almost all AWG wire sizes.
so there's plenty of current flow despite the resistance of the steel vs copper.
Agreed, there is plenty of conductor, it's just that there are many more junctions to have problems with, connector crimps etc. Every time there are dissimilar metal junctions, there are opportunities to have corrosion, I'm trying to eliminate those.

Cheers
Old 04-08-2018, 02:38 PM
  #7  
Tiger03447
Rennlist Member
 
Tiger03447's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Elizabethton,TN
Posts: 3,411
Received 151 Likes on 132 Posts
Default

When you break any of the electrical connections, use some dielectric grease before reassembling them..helps prevent future corrosion...You can also use electronic cleaner on the connections as well to help clean them, especially the female side of the connectors. I found my car had lotsa corrosion after sitting out in New Hampshire winters in a field for about 10 years.
Old 04-11-2018, 12:06 PM
  #8  
jej3
Three Wheelin'
 
jej3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Jacksonville and sometimes St. Aug Beach, FL
Posts: 1,727
Received 342 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

Dielectric grease is suitable to apply AFTER the connection has been made; it inhibits corrosion but if applied before assembly, it also inhibits conduction. I'd use Deoxit as your cleaner for all contact points and possibly some stabilant to improve the conduction.
Old 04-11-2018, 01:15 PM
  #9  
marc abrams
Burning Brakes
 
marc abrams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,137
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

From working on salt spreaders the best stuff I've seen for terminal protection by far is Permatex battery protector and sealant. It also protects the wire itself too. Without it I've seen the copper wire turn to green power as far back as 3 feet or more from the terminal!

From seeing what salt can do to those trucks, I'm amazed by how many people drive their classic cars on salt covered roads.
Old 04-11-2018, 11:00 PM
  #10  
pauldvazquez
Rennlist Member
 
pauldvazquez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Shelton, WA
Posts: 187
Received 92 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

One thing I noticed while cleaning up ground points this past fall, is that the terminal rings are real high quality copper connectors. The irony in this is that the copper terminal rings were in many cases, landed on aluminum. Definitely a recipe for a poor ground connection, given enough time, especially in a wet climate.
Old 04-12-2018, 03:33 AM
  #11  
Kilohertz
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
Kilohertz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Slightly left of Vernon, BC
Posts: 74
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

HI guys,

Thanks for all of the excellent info, much appreciated. I have cleaned all of the major ground and power connection points, and had my can of Deoxit present and applied to all connections, everything seems good. I have some special battery paste that we used on all of our batteries when I was a signal maintainer for the railway. 2 different types, one is a thick brown paste, usually put on as the connections are made, the other is a clear thinner paste, dielectric grease in a jar used after the connections are made.

I also would like to know the recommended, if any treatment for the torpedo fuses and holders once they have been cleaned. I would think any of the tin fuses should be replaced with copper to avoid dissimilar metal junctions. Any other recommendations?

Cheers
Old 04-12-2018, 02:16 PM
  #12  
StoogeMoe
Rennlist Member
 
StoogeMoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Poconos PA
Posts: 2,808
Received 154 Likes on 106 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kilohertz
HI guys,

Thanks for all of the excellent info, much appreciated. I have cleaned all of the major ground and power connection points, and had my can of Deoxit present and applied to all connections, everything seems good. I have some special battery paste that we used on all of our batteries when I was a signal maintainer for the railway. 2 different types, one is a thick brown paste, usually put on as the connections are made, the other is a clear thinner paste, dielectric grease in a jar used after the connections are made.

I also would like to know the recommended, if any treatment for the torpedo fuses and holders once they have been cleaned. I would think any of the tin fuses should be replaced with copper to avoid dissimilar metal junctions. Any other recommendations?

Cheers
No treatment necessary for the fuses, unless you plan to park the car under water or live near the ocean. Mine have been in there 35 years and still look pristine. I cleaned them a few years ago with DeOxit just for something to do. I think I replaced any cheap replacement fuses that weren't made of copper that I found.
Old 04-12-2018, 02:38 PM
  #13  
Dan Martinic
Drifting
 
Dan Martinic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,148
Received 157 Likes on 131 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mrgreenjeans
And again, remember the '82-'83 cars differ in wiring from their '84 - '85.1 brothers, and again from '85.2 and up.
If there's a difference in the grounding, perhaps you could update. I believe on my '88 the ground wire from the battery splits with one end connected to the frame nearby and another to the bellhousing? Have to check... but i do know that there are three connections at the bellhousing; one on its own and two on top of each other right beside



Quick Reply: Correcting Porsche's Ground design...am I nuts or on the right track?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:40 PM.