Can you run 3.6L 964 turbo P&C's on 3.3?
#7
There's an interesting and relevant thread over on Pelican:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/showt...53#post2159553
According to Henry Schmidt, it's possible to achieve approximately 3.5 liters by using a 3.6 case, 3.6 n/a pistons machined to a custom comp ratio, a 3.3 crank, and 3.3 heads machined for different stud spacing. Sounds like an interesting and potentially robust way to bump displacement compared to the 100 mm p/cs shoehorned into a 3.3 case. And per his post, he'll do that mod for *the same price* as the cost of new 3.4 p/cs (which is up to about $4600). That means that used 3.6 parts must be relatively inexpensive, which was also something I didn't know. It occurred to me that if this idea was coupled with Nickies or JB Racing's iron/alum cylinders, you may have yet another opportunity to ceremonially squander your hard earned dollars in the quest for a big displacement and high horsepower.
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/showt...53#post2159553
According to Henry Schmidt, it's possible to achieve approximately 3.5 liters by using a 3.6 case, 3.6 n/a pistons machined to a custom comp ratio, a 3.3 crank, and 3.3 heads machined for different stud spacing. Sounds like an interesting and potentially robust way to bump displacement compared to the 100 mm p/cs shoehorned into a 3.3 case. And per his post, he'll do that mod for *the same price* as the cost of new 3.4 p/cs (which is up to about $4600). That means that used 3.6 parts must be relatively inexpensive, which was also something I didn't know. It occurred to me that if this idea was coupled with Nickies or JB Racing's iron/alum cylinders, you may have yet another opportunity to ceremonially squander your hard earned dollars in the quest for a big displacement and high horsepower.
Trending Topics
#8
Sameer,
I know people have been using the 100mm jugs for quite a while.. I believe initially it involved case work, but I assume Mahle changed machiing and they drop-in now. . not sure.. I personally would prefer a 3.4 or 3.3.. stronger and better sealing... (right Geoff :-)..).. if its a big deal I can confirm...
e
I know people have been using the 100mm jugs for quite a while.. I believe initially it involved case work, but I assume Mahle changed machiing and they drop-in now. . not sure.. I personally would prefer a 3.4 or 3.3.. stronger and better sealing... (right Geoff :-)..).. if its a big deal I can confirm...
e