Notices
911 Forum 1964-1989
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Intercity Lines, LLC

Catalytic converter on a Euro 3.2?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-08-2015, 08:26 PM
  #1  
Matt Lane
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Matt Lane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 4,453
Received 190 Likes on 113 Posts
Default Catalytic converter on a Euro 3.2?

Got underneath my new-to-me project 1986 the other day, and noticed it has a Cargraphic catalyst like this one. Nice shiny Cargraphic labeled heat shield too.

Wonder how many Euro 911's would have had one of these installed? Any thoughts on the performance degradation vs. stock no-catalytic converter?

Cheers

Matt
Attached Images  
Old 08-08-2015, 09:35 PM
  #2  
Amber Gramps
Addict
 
Amber Gramps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Alta Loma Alone
Posts: 37,770
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

I'd gladly give up a bit of performance to not have to smell untreated exhaust. I had my cat off years ago and ended up giving away the bypass to a fellow rennlister. Raw exhaust is just something that I had forgotten about and don't miss.
Old 08-08-2015, 10:00 PM
  #3  
Drisump
Racer
 
Drisump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Quite a few I think, the "gray market" cars had to comply with many of the regulations upon entry into N. America. My Euro probably had it when it entered the US but before I got it, it was removed. Cheers
Old 08-10-2015, 04:28 PM
  #4  
Matt Lane
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Matt Lane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 4,453
Received 190 Likes on 113 Posts
Default

Any idea what this does to performance on the Euro 3.2? I know there was a higher HP spec due to the higher compression. Wondering if anything is being sacrificed with the addition of the catalytic converter (besides the smell)!

Cheers

Matt
Old 08-10-2015, 04:47 PM
  #5  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,356
Received 565 Likes on 389 Posts
Default

for MY86 there were 2 normally aspirated 911 engines
930/20 RoW 170kw/231hp, eng # 63G 00001-10000, cr 10.3
930/21 US, J, Australia, Sweden, Switz. Option code M298 152kw/207hp, eng # 64G 00001-10000, cr9.5

biggest diff is the cr and O sensor on the /21, tuning parameters too of course

check the eng #s to be sure what it was originally, lots of the 231hp(/20) versions had a cat added when they were brought over to North America
Old 08-10-2015, 07:32 PM
  #6  
Matt Lane
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Matt Lane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 4,453
Received 190 Likes on 113 Posts
Default

Thanks Bill, will check.

The transmission is definitely original (with the Euro cooler). Assuming it is the original Euro engine, anyone know the performance difference between running as originally designed (no cat) vs. adding one?

Best,

Matt
Old 08-10-2015, 09:23 PM
  #7  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,356
Received 565 Likes on 389 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Matt Lane
Thanks Bill, will check.

The transmission is definitely original (with the Euro cooler). Assuming it is the original Euro engine, anyone know the performance difference between running as originally designed (no cat) vs. adding one?

Best,

Matt
Again, some of the Euro cars had the M298 option, you want to see if it's a /20 or /21

the /20 just ran in open loop mode all the time, the /21 was only in open loop at WOT, the rest of the time the signal from the O sensor controlled mixture and timing.

If it's a /21 w/ an add on O sensor it depend on what mods were done to the DME to use the O signal,

for the most part the main performance related things are going to be fuel mileage related, the /20 will likely get somewhat better mpg do to tighter mixture/spark control and max performance at WOT where the lower cr and poorer exhaust flow come into play
Old 08-10-2015, 09:40 PM
  #8  
Matt Lane
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Matt Lane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 4,453
Received 190 Likes on 113 Posts
Default

Thanks Bill, will check the engine code to be sure.

Car was a Porsche Bremen delivery, serviced all its life in Germany, and based on the records, the Cargraphic cat was also added in Germany later on (90's). I assumed as an addition, not as a replacement, but will see.

Cheers

Matt
Old 08-11-2015, 03:53 AM
  #9  
Mondrian
Three Wheelin'
 
Mondrian's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

IIRC the difference between euro (231) & US (216) is around 15 but as already mentioned engine internals were also different - I expect the cat would account for at least 10 of that i would expect that the chip would also need to be changed/remapped accordingly.
Old 08-11-2015, 01:08 PM
  #10  
theiceman
Team Owner
 
theiceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cambridge Ontario Canada
Posts: 27,042
Received 1,137 Likes on 812 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mondrian
IIRC the difference between euro (231) & US (216) is around 15 but as already mentioned engine internals were also different - I expect the cat would account for at least 10 of that i would expect that the chip would also need to be changed/remapped accordingly.
think 10 is very generous, Porsches have always used high flow cats which provide very little detriment to HP.

would be interesting to get a factual before and after dyno run though.
Old 08-14-2015, 09:47 PM
  #11  
Matt Lane
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Matt Lane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 4,453
Received 190 Likes on 113 Posts
Default

In my case, it's not how much to gain - it's how much may have been lost.

The cat is not stock, and I can guarantee there was nothing done to the chip to account for its installation on an engine map that was not designed for it.

Cheers

Matt



Quick Reply: Catalytic converter on a Euro 3.2?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:31 AM.