blockhed

If you had to chose between a 78-82 sc coupe or 84/85 3.2 which would you chose snd why? For argument sake let's say theyre similar miles and price point.

ivangene

84-86 are all about the same...
I think they are a solid platform and daily drive mine...also auto X and run performance driving days on track.
It has been excellent

IMO the car is a little newer/more modern fuel delivery, electronics engine management and that's about it.

I would not back away from an SC, but they are a little more raw and raw means a little more finicky to dial in and maintain adjustments...thats opinion, no real world experience

blockhed

How about the ease of modifying, since im an addict

theiceman

Just as a data point . Never had to adjust anything on mine in about 3 years . ( SC) the only reasn i did 3 years ago was self induced so no real adjustments in about 6.

There is lots of stuff on this topic so i am not gona realy rhash anything jut go use the search. But thought i would just add some real world experience.

ivangene

well you could get an SC and modify it to a 3.2

good point ice, I have heard they are good but again, no experience (YET!)

masterdave

The engines are for the most part the same mechanically. The big differences are obviously the G50 and the EFI instead of the MFI. I have a 78SC my self and I feel that the 915 trans has made me a better driver, as i really have to focus on what im doing. As for EFI over MFI, you will be able to "chip" the 3.2 easily if you want a bit of a bump in power this obviously cant be done with the 3.0SC. As for the car body they are to the best of my knowledge the same. The G50 VS 915 is an on going debate and there are lots of threads on it. In the end what i have gotten from most arguments is that if you are looking for more of a daily driver/easy rider/you are older and dont want to really exert your self to drive a car, go for the G50. The ease of shifting will make a big difference, I think it has a hydrolic clutch not a cable but im not totally sure. If you are looking to beef up your left calf muscle and watch your shifts very closely, get a 915. In the end of the day you will be happy with either purchase. You will also be more likely to find AC in the 3.2 at least from the ones I have seen. For some this is an issue for others its not. I have heard the system does not work well but for under a G you can make it work quite well. I do not have AC but as I have a targa I usually just roll with the top down in the summer. As for reliability, a well kept 3.0 or 3.2 will be the same, given they are well cared for.
If you list what you are looking for in the car we may be able to help narrow it down, i.e. track car, daily driver, comfort level, speed, do you want a project car etc. etc.


Regards
Dave

ivangene

the body on G50 - 915 is at least differant at the rear torsion bar tubes...the G50 has a much larger hole in the body than pre G50's - the actual tube is also differant.

masterdave

ivangene

Is there any difference on the exterior, I knew there would be some difference under the hood and what not. I was more wondering if the car looked any different aside form the carrera badge.

blockhed

Im mainly looking to dd the car. Wouldn't go overboard with modifying, no need for a/c. I might track it here and there. In general a fun, zippy daily driver.

mehoff

'84/85 is still 915 tranny. G50 didn't hit until '87.

KNS

blockhed,

Do you currently drive a water cooled 911 that you're looking to switch out of..?
Just wondering due to the Avtar.

whalebird

way to much info on here to rehash this comparison. A great start would be to pick up "the used 911 story" by Peter Zimmerman.
They are all great cars with slight differences from one year to the next. Find the nicest example, lay down the cash, and you will probably never look back on your purchase regardless of year. This, of coarse given the same price point and condition.

blockhed

I read 4 books from what the cars are and how to work on them and so on
I have a highly modified 996TT-twin 3076's, fuel, 4.5" intercoolers and etc
I'm looking for personal opinions, experiences, specially from people who might have had both.
I'm looking to pick up something from 78-87 era and not particular on comforts like A/C and so forth.
I'm looking for a fun daily driver, that I can mod a little, be reliable, and handle well.

Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems

JMHO, but you cannot go wrong with ANY Carrera. Good, solid performers with rock-like durability and these handle the ethanol-laced fuels much better than CIS cars do.

Just get a thorough PPI on any candidate so you do not get surprised.

masterdave

My mistake, I was under the impression that the G50 hit with the Carrera 3.2 in 84. In any case you cant go wrong here. On any note if you are looking for a DD i would stay away from the Targas. I have one and love it but in the rain there can be issues. After 30 some years of being used, the top just does not fit right. The seals are all in good shape and the top was recovered recently but the windows never seem to meet it perfectly. In terms of reliability these are the ones to go for. As im sure you know they are no ford, they do require attention. I drove mine a solid 5K miles this summer and had little to nothing to do aside from oil and plugs. To stand testimite to how durable it is, i give you this video...