911 74S ?
#1
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hi,
I need advice...
One of my friend's is selling his 1974 911S coupe with a 3.2 engine, but it has 3.0 heads and dual webber carbs.
I am considering to purchase it and make it into Porsche hot rod, but i have always had people telling me to get 1973 S, T or E or 1970 car..
can someone please explain is there that much difference... as far as chassy goes
for weekend driving and at times autocrosssing
Thanks
I need advice...
One of my friend's is selling his 1974 911S coupe with a 3.2 engine, but it has 3.0 heads and dual webber carbs.
I am considering to purchase it and make it into Porsche hot rod, but i have always had people telling me to get 1973 S, T or E or 1970 car..
can someone please explain is there that much difference... as far as chassy goes
for weekend driving and at times autocrosssing
Thanks
#2
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Price wise 1970 to 73 cars are becoming somewhat pricey if they are in good shape and with matching numbers, be they T, E or S. A 74 car should be price reasonable even with a 3.0 or 3.2 engine. You may want to consider an SC with matching numbers because price wise they haven't taken off yet, and their are some nice ones out there to be had.![thumbup](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/thumbup.gif)
![thumbup](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/thumbup.gif)
Hi,
I need advice...
One of my friend's is selling his 1974 911S coupe with a 3.2 engine, but it has 3.0 heads and dual webber carbs.
I am considering to purchase it and make it into Porsche hot rod, but i have always had people telling me to get 1973 S, T or E or 1970 car..
can someone please explain is there that much difference... as far as chassy goes
for weekend driving and at times autocrosssing
Thanks
I need advice...
One of my friend's is selling his 1974 911S coupe with a 3.2 engine, but it has 3.0 heads and dual webber carbs.
I am considering to purchase it and make it into Porsche hot rod, but i have always had people telling me to get 1973 S, T or E or 1970 car..
can someone please explain is there that much difference... as far as chassy goes
for weekend driving and at times autocrosssing
Thanks
#3
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
No, there's not that much difference in the chassis of any '69-'89 car. Suspension geometry-wise. And as above, the price differential pre/post 1974 is getting to be huge.
As far as an autocross car? Pretty much anything can go out there and be driven around. To be competitive with an modified/engine swap car you start getting into seriously prepared cars.
Ultimately, it comes down to YOU wanting THIS car, and if the price makes sense.
As far as an autocross car? Pretty much anything can go out there and be driven around. To be competitive with an modified/engine swap car you start getting into seriously prepared cars.
Ultimately, it comes down to YOU wanting THIS car, and if the price makes sense.
#4
RL Technical Advisor
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hi,
I need advice...
One of my friend's is selling his 1974 911S coupe with a 3.2 engine, but it has 3.0 heads and dual webber carbs.
I am considering to purchase it and make it into Porsche hot rod, but i have always had people telling me to get 1973 S, T or E or 1970 car..
can someone please explain is there that much difference... as far as chassy goes
for weekend driving and at times autocrosssing
Thanks
I need advice...
One of my friend's is selling his 1974 911S coupe with a 3.2 engine, but it has 3.0 heads and dual webber carbs.
I am considering to purchase it and make it into Porsche hot rod, but i have always had people telling me to get 1973 S, T or E or 1970 car..
can someone please explain is there that much difference... as far as chassy goes
for weekend driving and at times autocrosssing
Thanks
You'll want a thorough PPI done to prevent any surprises.
#5
Race Car
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I agree with race911 and Steve W. Those guys really know their stuff - the oracle(s) have spoken. Sounds like a promising car to start with and, if well sorted, would be a blast to drive. A 74 can be made into a very sneaky-fast car and is one of my top picks for a hot rod. If you have some pictures, post them up here and keep us informed as to the details of this car. Sounds like fun
Did anyone mention get a PPI? yes and they are spot on, everyone in this community would urge the PPI.
Did anyone mention get a PPI? yes and they are spot on, everyone in this community would urge the PPI.
#7
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
2575 per the Club Racing rulebook, but I think that's with 150lbs. driver allowance now. So that's still around 2400, then add back what the Al 3.2 weighs v. the Mg 2.7. If I remember at all correctly, my friend's '74 with a CIS 3.0 (the guy who actually owns the 910), was right around 2500 last time we had it on the scales.
Trending Topics
#8
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
How pricey are they right now (range) ??
Price wise 1970 to 73 cars are becoming somewhat pricey if they are in good shape and with matching numbers, be they T, E or S. A 74 car should be price reasonable even with a 3.0 or 3.2 engine. You may want to consider an SC with matching numbers because price wise they haven't taken off yet, and their are some nice ones out there to be had.![thumbup](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/thumbup.gif)
![thumbup](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/thumbup.gif)
#9
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I've seen some Ts starting in the mid 20s and going into the 40s according to year and condition. E cars with mechanical injection being price higher than the T, and I've seen some S prices ranging from 50 thousand to 100 thousand according to condition, mileage and authenticity.
#10
Instructor
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
My Dad's 75' (soon to be mine if I can find a buyer for my 993) was right at 2400lb with the original mag case 915, 3.2L cased 3.0L, 16"x6" and 16X7" fuchs, no external oil cooler, and an RS carpet kit and 1/2 tank of gas. The car is a blast but needed the an external cooler which has since added some weight since then. For the money, it is hard to go wrong with a mid year car with a later motor. Most prefer the look of the early cars but for the price differential, it is hard to justify. For comparison to an early car, in talking with my Dad, we figure his car with 30k miles on a rebuilt engine, 2k miles on rebuilt trans, gone through suspension with lots of elephant racing parts but a sudo rat rod in appearance it is only worth about $9k.
The last 3 autocrosses I have done in it I have had 5th fastest time of day, and first in PAX so it is respectably quick and we have a pretty good region as far as drivers and fast cars.
The last 3 autocrosses I have done in it I have had 5th fastest time of day, and first in PAX so it is respectably quick and we have a pretty good region as far as drivers and fast cars.
#13
#14
RL Technical Advisor
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
JMHO, but I think you're right.
With their light weight, no emissions equipment, competent chassis, and good performance (no matter what motor is used), its a good car on its own as well as an excellent foundation for a 'hot rod",...
With their light weight, no emissions equipment, competent chassis, and good performance (no matter what motor is used), its a good car on its own as well as an excellent foundation for a 'hot rod",...
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#15
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Since we're waxing nostalgic on '74s.............here's what I think is the ultimate one, street version anyway. Even if we couldn't get one here. And what I sorta replicated my first 911 off of, with the best L.A. fiberglass money could buy in the early '80s.
From the Monterey Historics, 1988. Also note Cris Huergas (Mr. RGruppe himself, years before it became a reality, but he'd had the idea since we'd met in 1980) in the background.
(Also, gratuitous photo of the one '74 I had, after it got messed around with.)
From the Monterey Historics, 1988. Also note Cris Huergas (Mr. RGruppe himself, years before it became a reality, but he'd had the idea since we'd met in 1980) in the background.
(Also, gratuitous photo of the one '74 I had, after it got messed around with.)